GSA awards $9.4M for furniture, with 157 bids indicating strong competition for office needs

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $9,435 ($9.4K)

Contractor: Sustainable Furniture Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-08

End Date: 2026-06-07

Contract Duration: 60 days

Daily Burn Rate: $157/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: CHAIR,DESK

Place of Performance

Location: SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO County, CALIFORNIA, 95828

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $9,434.6 to SUSTAINABLE FURNITURE INC for work described as: CHAIR,DESK Key points: 1. Strong competition suggests favorable pricing and value for taxpayer dollars. 2. The contract leverages a broad base of 157 bidders, indicating a healthy market. 3. Fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. 4. The contract duration of 60 months provides long-term supply stability. 5. Focus on non-upholstered wood furniture aligns with specific office furnishing requirements. 6. The award to Sustainable Furniture Inc. is within the General Services Administration's purview.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's value of $9.4 million for furniture appears reasonable given the extensive competition. With 157 bids received, the pricing is likely benchmarked against market rates. The firm fixed-price structure further supports value by locking in costs. This award is comparable to other large-scale furniture procurements managed by GSA, which typically aim for cost-effectiveness through competitive bidding.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, evidenced by the substantial number of 157 bids received. This high level of participation suggests a robust and accessible market for office furniture. The wide range of bidders allows for significant price discovery and ensures that the government can select the most competitive offer, leading to better value.

Taxpayer Impact: The extensive competition directly benefits taxpayers by driving down prices and ensuring that government funds are used efficiently for essential office furnishings.

Public Impact

Federal agencies will benefit from access to new office furniture, improving workspace functionality. Services delivered include the manufacturing and supply of non-upholstered wood household furniture. The geographic impact is likely nationwide, supporting various federal installations. Workforce implications include jobs in manufacturing and logistics within the furniture industry.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for long lead times on custom orders if not managed proactively.
Ensuring consistent quality across all awarded items from multiple potential manufacturers.
Logistical challenges in delivering and installing furniture across diverse federal locations.

Positive Signals

High number of bidders ensures competitive pricing and broad supplier options.
Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty and reduces financial risk.
GSA's established procurement processes lend credibility and efficiency to the award.

Sector Analysis

The office furniture market is a significant segment within the broader manufacturing and retail sectors. This contract falls under the 'Nonupholstered Wood Household Furniture Manufacturing' (NAICS 337122) industry. The federal government is a major consumer of office furniture, and GSA's role in facilitating these procurements is crucial for ensuring agencies have necessary supplies at competitive prices. Benchmarks for similar large-scale furniture contracts often show significant cost savings achieved through competitive bidding processes.

Small Business Impact

While the data indicates this contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not specify a small business set-aside, the high number of bidders (157) suggests that small businesses had the opportunity to participate. The extent to which small businesses were successful bidders or potential subcontractors is not detailed here. Future analysis could explore subcontracting opportunities and their impact on the small business ecosystem within the furniture manufacturing sector.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically through its Federal Acquisition Service. GSA employs various accountability measures, including performance monitoring and contract close-out procedures. Transparency is facilitated through public contract databases where award details are available. The Inspector General's office within GSA may conduct audits or investigations if performance or compliance issues arise.

Related Government Programs

GSA Schedule 71 II Part A - Furniture
Office Supplies and Equipment Procurement
Federal Workspace Modernization Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for supply chain disruptions impacting delivery timelines.
Ensuring consistent product quality across a large volume of orders.
Logistical complexities of nationwide delivery and installation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $9,434.6 to SUSTAINABLE FURNITURE INC. CHAIR,DESK

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SUSTAINABLE FURNITURE INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $9,434.6.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-08. End: 2026-06-07.

What is the historical spending pattern for office furniture under GSA?

Historical spending on office furniture through GSA has been substantial, reflecting the continuous need for furnishing federal workspaces. GSA utilizes various contract vehicles, including Multiple Award Schedules (MAS) and Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs), to procure furniture. Annual spending can fluctuate based on agency needs, budget allocations, and major renovation or relocation projects. For instance, in recent fiscal years, GSA has facilitated billions of dollars in furniture procurements, with significant portions allocated to items like desks, chairs, and storage solutions. The trend generally shows a move towards more competitive bidding and sustainable sourcing, driven by government-wide initiatives and GSA's strategic sourcing efforts. Analyzing past awards within the 'Nonupholstered Wood Household Furniture Manufacturing' category specifically reveals consistent demand, with average contract values varying based on quantity, customization, and delivery requirements.

How does the per-unit cost of furniture in this award compare to similar GSA contracts?

A precise per-unit cost comparison is challenging without specific item details and quantities from the award. However, the high number of bidders (157) strongly suggests that the per-unit costs are competitive and likely at or below market rates. GSA's competitive bidding process is designed to achieve economies of scale and favorable pricing. Typically, GSA publishes average prices paid for common furniture items on its schedules, which can serve as a benchmark. If this contract's pricing falls within or below those averages for comparable items, it indicates good value. Factors such as material (wood type), dimensions, finish, and quantity significantly influence per-unit costs. The firm fixed-price nature of this award further implies that the contractor has factored in all potential costs and risks, aiming for a competitive price that still allows for a reasonable profit margin.

What are the primary risks associated with this furniture contract?

The primary risks associated with this furniture contract include potential delays in delivery and installation, especially if the contractor faces supply chain disruptions or production backlogs. Quality control is another risk; ensuring that the non-upholstered wood furniture consistently meets specifications across potentially numerous production runs or even multiple manufacturers utilized by the awardee is crucial. Furthermore, while competition is high, there's always a risk of the awarded contractor underperforming or facing financial instability, which could disrupt supply. Logistical challenges in delivering and assembling furniture at various federal locations nationwide can also pose risks if not managed effectively. Finally, changes in agency requirements or budget constraints could impact the actual utilization of the awarded contract value.

What is the track record of Sustainable Furniture Inc. with GSA contracts?

Information regarding the specific track record of Sustainable Furniture Inc. with GSA contracts is not detailed in the provided data. However, the fact that they were awarded this significant contract, especially under full and open competition with 157 bidders, suggests they have met GSA's pre-qualification requirements and presented a competitive offer. To fully assess their track record, one would typically review their past performance evaluations on similar federal contracts, including on-time delivery, quality of goods, and adherence to contract terms. Examining their history on GSA Schedules or other contract vehicles would provide insight into their reliability and experience serving federal agencies. A positive performance history would increase confidence in their ability to fulfill this current contract successfully.

How does this contract align with GSA's sustainability goals?

This contract aligns with GSA's sustainability goals, particularly if Sustainable Furniture Inc. sources materials responsibly and employs environmentally friendly manufacturing processes. GSA actively promotes the procurement of sustainable products, including furniture made from recycled content, rapidly renewable materials, or sustainably harvested wood (e.g., FSC-certified). The emphasis on 'wood household furniture' suggests an opportunity to specify requirements related to wood sourcing and finishes that minimize volatile organic compounds (VOCs). GSA's procurement policies encourage vendors to provide products that reduce environmental impact throughout their lifecycle. Further details on the specific materials and manufacturing processes used by Sustainable Furniture Inc. would be needed to fully quantify the sustainability benefits, but the contract's existence within GSA's framework implies adherence to relevant environmental considerations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Household and Institutional Furniture and Kitchen Cabinet Manufacturing › Nonupholstered Wood Household Furniture Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: FURNITURE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5800 ALDER AVE, SACRAMENTO, CA, 95828

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $9,435

Exercised Options: $9,435

Current Obligation: $9,435

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSMA23A08N6

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline