GSA awards $10.6M contract for cleaning tool kits, with 22 bidders vying for the opportunity

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,631 ($10.6K)

Contractor: Wright Tool Company, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-01

End Date: 2026-04-09

Contract Duration: 8 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 22

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT

Sector: Other

Official Description: TOOL KIT, WEAPONS CLEANING: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL.

Place of Performance

Location: WARREN, MACOMB County, MICHIGAN, 48091

State: Michigan Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $10,631.4 to WRIGHT TOOL COMPANY, LLC for work described as: TOOL KIT, WEAPONS CLEANING: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL. Key points: 1. The contract value of $10.6 million over 8 months suggests a significant need for these cleaning tool kits. 2. With 22 bidders, the competition level indicates a healthy market for this type of hardware. 3. The fixed-price with economic price adjustment structure introduces some risk of cost escalation. 4. The contract is managed by the General Services Administration, a key agency for federal procurement. 5. The product falls under the Hardware Merchant Wholesalers category, suggesting a broad range of potential suppliers. 6. The BPA Call award type implies a streamlined procurement process, potentially leveraging existing agreements.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

Benchmarking the value of this contract requires more specific data on the contents of the 'TOOL KIT, WEAPONS CLEANING'. However, the presence of 22 bidders suggests that the pricing is likely competitive within the market for such specialized hardware. The fixed-price with economic price adjustment (EPA) clause introduces a degree of uncertainty regarding the final cost, but this is a common practice for goods subject to market fluctuations. Without detailed unit costs or a comparison to similar GSA schedules, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the competitive bidding process is a positive indicator.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, with 22 distinct bidders participating. This high level of competition is a strong positive signal, indicating that the market for these cleaning tool kits is robust and accessible to a wide range of suppliers. The significant number of bidders likely drove down prices and ensured that the government received competitive offers. The GSA's management of this procurement suggests adherence to standard competitive procedures.

Taxpayer Impact: The extensive competition for this contract is beneficial for taxpayers as it likely resulted in more favorable pricing and a wider selection of quality products. It demonstrates that taxpayer funds are being used efficiently by leveraging market forces to secure necessary supplies.

Public Impact

Military and law enforcement agencies are the primary beneficiaries, receiving essential cleaning and maintenance supplies for weapons. The contract ensures the availability of specialized tool kits crucial for maintaining operational readiness and equipment longevity. The geographic impact is national, as GSA procurements typically serve federal agencies across the United States. The contract supports jobs within the hardware wholesale and manufacturing sectors, particularly those involved in producing specialized cleaning equipment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The 'economic price adjustment' clause introduces potential for cost overruns if market prices for components increase significantly.
The specific contents of the 'TOOL KIT, WEAPONS CLEANING' are not detailed in the provided summary, making a precise assessment of value difficult.
The short duration of the contract (8 months) may lead to frequent re-procurement efforts, potentially increasing administrative costs.

Positive Signals

Awarded under 'full and open competition' with 22 bidders, indicating a healthy and competitive market.
Managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), which typically employs robust procurement processes.
The 'BPA CALL' award type suggests efficiency and potential use of pre-negotiated terms, possibly leading to cost savings.
The fixed-price nature, even with EPA, provides a baseline cost control mechanism.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader 'Hardware Merchant Wholesalers' sector (NAICS 423710). This sector encompasses establishments primarily engaged in wholesaling hardware, and related goods such as tools, plumbing supplies, and paint. The market for specialized cleaning and maintenance tool kits is a niche within this larger industry. Federal spending in this category is consistent, driven by the ongoing needs of defense, law enforcement, and other government entities requiring equipment maintenance. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend on the specific items included in the tool kit, but GSA schedules often provide competitive pricing for such goods.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (sb: false). However, with 22 bidders in a full and open competition, it is possible that small businesses were among the participants, potentially as prime contractors or as subcontractors to larger firms. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether any small businesses were awarded portions of the contract or if they supplied components to the prime contractor. Further analysis of subcontracting plans would be needed to fully assess the impact.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) oversees this contract, utilizing its Federal Acquisition Service. GSA is known for its established procurement regulations and oversight mechanisms designed to ensure fair and competitive contracting. The 'BPA CALL' award type suggests that this procurement likely falls under an existing Blanket Purchase Agreement, which itself would have undergone a competitive process. Transparency is generally maintained through GSA's public contract databases. Inspector General oversight would apply if any issues of fraud, waste, or abuse arise.

Related Government Programs

GSA Schedules Program
Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative
Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Supply Contracts
General Supplies and Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost escalation due to Economic Price Adjustment clause.
Lack of detailed itemization for the tool kit hinders precise value assessment.
Short contract duration may necessitate frequent re-procurement.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $10,631.4 to WRIGHT TOOL COMPANY, LLC. TOOL KIT, WEAPONS CLEANING: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WRIGHT TOOL COMPANY, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10,631.4.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2026-04-09.

What specific items are included in the 'TOOL KIT, WEAPONS CLEANING' and what is the unit cost breakdown?

The provided data summary indicates 'TOOL KIT, WEAPONS CLEANING: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL.' Without access to the attached document, the specific contents of the tool kit remain unknown. This lack of detail prevents a granular analysis of the value proposition, such as assessing the cost of individual components (brushes, solvents, cloths, etc.) against market rates. The total contract value of $10.6 million is for the entire kit, and without knowing the quantity of kits or the specific items within each, calculating a precise per-unit cost or benchmarking against similar offerings is not feasible. Future analysis should aim to obtain the detailed list of included items to validate the pricing and ensure it aligns with the perceived value and necessity for the intended end-users.

How does the $10.6 million contract value compare to historical spending on similar weapon cleaning kits?

To compare this $10.6 million contract value to historical spending, one would need to access historical procurement data for similar weapon cleaning kits awarded by the GSA or other federal agencies. This would involve searching databases like FPDS or SAM.gov for contracts with comparable Product Service Codes (PSCs) or Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) categories related to cleaning equipment, maintenance kits, or specifically weapon maintenance supplies. Analyzing the quantity, duration, and unit prices of past awards would provide context. For instance, if similar kits were previously procured for significantly less, it might indicate an increase in material costs, a change in kit contents, or potentially less competitive pricing in this instance. Conversely, if historical values were similar or higher, it would suggest this award is in line with market trends and past government spending patterns.

What are the potential risks associated with the 'Economic Price Adjustment' (EPA) clause in this contract?

The primary risk associated with the Economic Price Adjustment (EPA) clause in this contract is the potential for cost escalation beyond the initially anticipated budget. While the contract is fixed-price, the EPA allows for adjustments based on fluctuations in specified economic factors, such as the cost of raw materials, labor, or transportation. If the market prices for the components used in the weapon cleaning kits increase significantly during the contract period, the total cost to the government could rise above the initial $10.6 million estimate. This uncertainty makes budget forecasting more challenging for the agency. To mitigate this risk, the government typically negotiates specific indices or formulas for the EPA, caps on adjustments, and requires documentation from the contractor to justify any price increases.

Given 22 bidders, what does this imply about the contractor's track record and the overall market competitiveness?

The fact that 22 bidders participated in this 'full and open competition' strongly suggests a highly competitive market for weapon cleaning kits and related hardware. This large number of bidders indicates that the barrier to entry for supplying such items is relatively low, and that numerous companies possess the capability and interest to compete for federal contracts. For the contractor that ultimately won the award, it implies they were able to offer a compelling combination of price, quality, and delivery terms to stand out amongst a crowded field. It also suggests that the winning contractor likely has a solid track record or a competitive advantage in terms of production capacity, supply chain, or pricing structure to successfully navigate such intense competition. The high number of bidders generally benefits the government through better price discovery and potentially higher quality offerings.

What is the significance of the 'BPA CALL' award type for this contract?

The 'BPA CALL' award type signifies that this contract was issued as a task order against a pre-existing Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA). BPAs are established by federal agencies to streamline the procurement of commonly purchased supplies or services. They are not contracts in themselves but rather agreements that set forth terms and conditions, including pricing, that can be used to issue orders. A 'BPA CALL' specifically means that an order was placed against an existing BPA. This award method typically implies that the underlying BPA was already competitively awarded, and the call order is a more efficient way to procure specific quantities or items under those established terms. This can lead to faster delivery times and potentially better pricing due to the pre-negotiated conditions of the BPA.

How does the NAICS code 423710 (Hardware Merchant Wholesalers) inform the analysis of this contract?

The assignment of NAICS code 423710, 'Hardware Merchant Wholesalers,' indicates that the primary business activity of the contractor, Wright Tool Company, LLC, is the wholesale distribution of hardware. This classification suggests that the company likely sources a variety of hardware products, potentially including tools, fasteners, and related items, from manufacturers and then sells them to other businesses, including government agencies. For this specific contract, it implies that the 'TOOL KIT, WEAPONS CLEANING' is likely composed of standard or specialized hardware components that fall within the scope of hardware wholesaling. This code helps in understanding the contractor's business model and in benchmarking this contract against other federal procurements within the broader hardware and tools supply sector.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Wholesale Trade › Hardware, and Plumbing and Heating Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers › Hardware Merchant Wholesalers

Product/Service Code: HAND TOOLS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 22

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Federal Resources Supply Company LLC

Address: 24680 MOUND RD, WARREN, MI, 48091

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,631

Exercised Options: $10,631

Current Obligation: $10,631

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSHA21A000D

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline