Analytic Designs Inc. awarded $3.18M for Icosystem Technical Training Support by GSA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,180,109 ($3.2M)

Contractor: Analytic Designs Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-02-12

End Date: 2026-02-11

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: ICOSYSTEM TECHNICAL TRAINING SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: COLUMBUS, FRANKLIN County, OHIO, 43215

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $3.2 million to ANALYTIC DESIGNS INC for work described as: ICOSYSTEM TECHNICAL TRAINING SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract value of $3.18M for a 364-day period suggests a focus on specialized, short-term training needs. 2. The 'Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences' NAICS code indicates a highly specialized technical domain. 3. Full and open competition after exclusion of sources implies a competitive process, though specific details on bidder numbers are needed. 4. Firm Fixed Price contract type offers cost certainty for the government. 5. The contract's duration of one year aligns with project-based or evolving training requirements. 6. Delivery Order award type suggests this is part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar framework.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $3.18M for a one-year training support service appears reasonable given the specialized nature of R&D technical training. Benchmarking against similar contracts for highly technical training in scientific fields would provide a more precise value assessment. The firm fixed price structure helps manage cost predictability for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating a competitive process was utilized. However, the specific number of bidders and the rationale for excluding certain sources are not detailed in the provided data. A robust competition level is generally expected to drive better pricing and service quality.

Taxpayer Impact: This competitive award mechanism is beneficial for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best value through market forces, potentially leading to cost savings compared to non-competitive awards.

Public Impact

Federal researchers and technical personnel in R&D fields will benefit from enhanced training. The services delivered will support the advancement of physical, engineering, and life sciences research. The contract is geographically focused on Ohio (ST: OH, SN: OHIO), suggesting training delivery or contractor presence in that state. The contract supports a specialized workforce requiring advanced technical skills in scientific domains.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific details on the number of bidders and evaluation criteria for the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' award.
The NAICS code 'Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences' is broad; the specific technical areas of training are not defined.
The contract is a Delivery Order, implying it's part of a larger IDIQ; understanding the parent contract's terms and competition is crucial for a full assessment.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The award was made through a competitive process, aiming for best value.
The contract duration of 364 days is suitable for focused, project-specific training needs.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on R&D support. The NAICS code 541715 covers a broad range of scientific research and development activities. Spending in this area is critical for maintaining technological superiority and innovation within government agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other training contracts awarded to specialized R&D support firms.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside criterion for this contract. Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses through set-asides is unlikely. However, the prime contractor, Analytic Designs Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors, depending on the scope and nature of the training services required.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Federal Acquisition Service. As a firm fixed-price contract, financial oversight focuses on ensuring deliverables meet the agreed-upon scope and quality. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, and any specific oversight mechanisms or Inspector General involvement would depend on the nature of the services and potential risks identified.

Related Government Programs

Federal R&D Funding
Technical Training Services
Scientific Research Support Contracts
GSA Federal Acquisition Service Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for training content obsolescence in rapidly evolving R&D fields.
Risk of contractor lacking highly specialized, niche technical expertise.
Need for clarity on the rationale behind 'exclusion of sources' in the competitive process.
Dependence on the parent IDIQ contract's terms and performance if this is a delivery order.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $3.2 million to ANALYTIC DESIGNS INC. ICOSYSTEM TECHNICAL TRAINING SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ANALYTIC DESIGNS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-02-12. End: 2026-02-11.

What is the track record of Analytic Designs Inc. in providing technical training services, particularly within the R&D sector?

Analytic Designs Inc. (ADI) has a history of providing technical support and training services. While the specific data here is for a single contract, ADI's broader portfolio often includes support for complex systems and research environments. To fully assess their track record for this specific 'Icosystem Technical Training Support' contract, a review of their past performance evaluations on similar government contracts would be necessary. This would include examining client feedback, on-time delivery rates, and adherence to technical specifications in previous engagements. Their experience in the physical, engineering, and life sciences domain, as indicated by the NAICS code, is a key factor in determining their suitability and past success.

How does the awarded amount of $3.18M compare to similar technical training contracts for R&D support?

The $3.18M contract value for a 364-day period for 'Icosystem Technical Training Support' appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized R&D training. However, a precise comparison requires benchmarking against contracts with similar NAICS codes (541715), service scopes (technical training), and contract types (Firm Fixed Price). Factors like the level of technical expertise required, the number of personnel to be trained, and the geographic location of service delivery significantly influence pricing. Without access to a broader dataset of comparable contracts, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents a premium or a discount. The competitive award process suggests an effort to achieve market-based pricing.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Key risks include the potential for the training content to become outdated quickly in a fast-evolving R&D landscape, and the risk of the contractor not possessing the highly specialized expertise required. Mitigation strategies likely involve clear performance work statements (PWS) that define specific learning objectives and required technical proficiencies, along with rigorous acceptance criteria. The Firm Fixed Price (FFP) structure mitigates financial risk for the government by capping costs. The competitive award process itself helps mitigate risks by selecting a contractor with demonstrated capabilities. Continuous monitoring of training effectiveness and contractor performance throughout the contract period is also crucial.

How effective is the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method in ensuring value for money in this context?

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method aims to ensure value for money by leveraging market competition. By opening the competition broadly but then excluding specific sources (the reasons for which would need further investigation), it suggests a desire to find the best offer while potentially managing specific constraints or requirements. The effectiveness hinges on the clarity of the solicitation, the number and quality of the bidders that participated, and the evaluation criteria used. If the exclusion criteria were justified and a sufficient number of capable bidders competed, it should lead to competitive pricing and a high-quality service provider. However, if the exclusions significantly limited the pool of qualified bidders, it could potentially reduce competitive pressure.

What is the historical spending trend for 'Icosystem Technical Training Support' or similar services by the General Services Administration?

Historical spending data for 'Icosystem Technical Training Support' specifically is not readily available without deeper database access. However, the General Services Administration (GSA), particularly through its Federal Acquisition Service (FAS), manages a vast array of training and technical support contracts across various domains. GSA's overall spending on professional, scientific, and technical services, including R&D support and training, is substantial, often running into billions of dollars annually. Analyzing GSA's historical spending patterns within NAICS code 541715 and related training categories would reveal trends in demand, average contract values, and the prevalence of different contract types, providing context for this specific award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › C – National Defense R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 47QFSA25Q0008

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 245 E GAY ST, COLUMBUS, OH, 43215

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,779,788

Exercised Options: $3,180,109

Current Obligation: $3,180,109

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QFSA24D0003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline