US Space Force Contract for Engineering Services Awarded to Federal Acquisition Services Team Oasis JV, LLC for Over $21.9M

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,991,978 ($22.0M)

Contractor: Federal Acquisition Services Team Oasis JV, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2021-01-01

End Date: 2025-12-31

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Defense

Official Description: US SPACE FORCE SPACE AND MISSILE COMMAND GMT S3

Place of Performance

Location: TOBYHANNA, MONROE County, PENNSYLVANIA, 18466

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $22.0 million to FEDERAL ACQUISITION SERVICES TEAM OASIS JV, LLC for work described as: US SPACE FORCE SPACE AND MISSILE COMMAND GMT S3 Key points: 1. The contract value of over $21.9 million represents a significant investment in engineering support for the Space Force. 2. Competition dynamics for this contract were 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES', indicating a structured but potentially limited bidding process. 3. The contract duration of 1825 days (5 years) suggests a long-term need for these engineering services. 4. The use of 'TIME AND MATERIALS' pricing could introduce cost variability if not closely managed. 5. This contract falls under the 'Engineering Services' NAICS code, aligning with specialized technical support requirements. 6. The awarding agency, General Services Administration, typically manages large-scale federal procurement vehicles.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract requires more detailed cost breakdowns and comparisons to similar engineering service contracts within the defense sector. The 'TIME AND MATERIALS' pricing structure, while flexible, can sometimes lead to higher costs than fixed-price contracts if not meticulously monitored. Without specific performance metrics or detailed cost-per-unit data, a definitive assessment of value-for-money is challenging. However, the duration and scope suggest a substantial need that the awarded amount aims to fulfill.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES'. This indicates that while the competition was intended to be open, certain sources were excluded prior to the full and open competition phase. The number of bidders is not specified, but the exclusion of sources suggests a pre-qualification or specific requirement that narrowed the field. This approach can sometimes limit the breadth of competition and potentially impact price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a structured procurement process, but the exclusion of sources may have limited the potential for the most competitive pricing achievable through a truly unrestricted open competition.

Public Impact

The US SPACE FORCE SPACE AND MISSILE COMMAND GMT S3 program benefits from specialized engineering expertise. This contract supports critical space and missile defense systems, contributing to national security. The services delivered are essential for the operational readiness and technological advancement of space assets. The geographic impact is primarily within the operational domains of the US Space Force, with potential implications for personnel in related facilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to the 'TIME AND MATERIALS' pricing model if not rigorously managed.
The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition phase might have limited the number of competitive bids, potentially affecting the final price.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the efficiency and effectiveness of the engineering services provided.
The long contract duration could lead to scope creep or evolving requirements that may not be optimally addressed within the initial contract terms.

Positive Signals

Awarded to a joint venture (OASIS JV, LLC), potentially leveraging diverse capabilities and expertise.
The contract is managed by the General Services Administration, a reputable agency for federal procurement.
The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' aspect, even with exclusions, suggests an effort to ensure a degree of market engagement.
The contract duration indicates a stable, long-term commitment to essential engineering support for the Space Force.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a critical component of the broader aerospace and defense industry. The market for specialized engineering support for government agencies, particularly in defense and space, is substantial and highly competitive. This contract represents a specific allocation of resources within the Space Force's budget for technical expertise, likely supporting complex systems development, maintenance, or operational analysis. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale engineering service contracts awarded by DoD agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation is not a primary focus for this specific contract, as 'sb' is false. There is no explicit mention of small business set-asides. Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses through this contract appears limited, and subcontracting opportunities for small businesses would depend on the prime contractor's strategy rather than a contractual requirement.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would likely be managed by the contracting officers within the General Services Administration and the US SPACE FORCE SPACE AND MISSILE COMMAND. Accountability measures are typically embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through federal procurement databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

US Space Force Procurement
Engineering Services Contracts
General Services Administration Contracts
Defense Sector IT and Engineering Support
Space and Missile Defense Systems Support

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to T&M pricing.
Limited competition due to source exclusion.
Long contract duration may lead to scope creep.
Lack of detailed performance metrics for value assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $22.0 million to FEDERAL ACQUISITION SERVICES TEAM OASIS JV, LLC. US SPACE FORCE SPACE AND MISSILE COMMAND GMT S3

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FEDERAL ACQUISITION SERVICES TEAM OASIS JV, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $22.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-01-01. End: 2025-12-31.

What is the track record of FEDERAL ACQUISITION SERVICES TEAM OASIS JV, LLC in delivering similar engineering services to the federal government?

Assessing the track record of FEDERAL ACQUISITION SERVICES TEAM OASIS JV, LLC requires a review of their past performance on federal contracts, particularly those involving engineering services for defense or space agencies. Information on contract history, past performance evaluations, and any documented issues or successes would be crucial. Without specific data on their prior performance, it's difficult to definitively gauge their reliability and capability for this specific Space Force contract. A deeper dive into contract databases and performance assessment reports would be necessary to provide a comprehensive answer.

How does the awarded amount of over $21.9 million compare to similar engineering service contracts for space and missile defense?

Comparing the $21.9 million contract value requires benchmarking against similar engineering service contracts awarded to other entities for comparable work within the space and missile defense domain. Factors such as contract duration, scope of work, and the specific technical requirements play a significant role in determining fair market value. If this contract is for a 5-year period, the annual value is approximately $4.4 million, which may be within a reasonable range for specialized engineering support. However, a detailed analysis of contract databases, considering the specific services rendered and the agencies involved, is needed for a precise comparison.

What are the primary risks associated with the 'TIME AND MATERIALS' pricing structure in this contract?

The primary risk associated with the 'TIME AND MATERIALS' (T&M) pricing structure is the potential for cost overruns. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M contracts reimburse the contractor for the actual labor hours and material costs incurred. If not managed with stringent oversight, this can lead to escalating expenses if the project scope expands, if labor hours are not efficiently utilized, or if material costs are higher than anticipated. For taxpayers, this means less predictability in the total cost of the contract. Effective risk mitigation involves close monitoring of labor hours, material invoices, and regular progress reviews to ensure the contractor's efforts align with project objectives and budget.

How does the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' procurement method impact price discovery and overall value for taxpayers?

The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' method aims for broad competition but introduces a layer of pre-selection. While it ensures that eligible, qualified sources can bid, the exclusion of certain sources prior to the open competition phase can limit the overall pool of potential bidders. This limitation might reduce the intensity of competition compared to a truly unrestricted open competition, potentially leading to less aggressive pricing. For taxpayers, this means that while a competitive process is followed, the ultimate price achieved might not be the absolute lowest possible if more bidders had been allowed to participate. The effectiveness of this method hinges on the justification for excluding sources and the number of remaining bidders.

What are the potential performance implications of a 5-year contract duration for engineering services?

A 5-year contract duration for engineering services offers stability and allows for the development of deep expertise and long-term relationships between the contractor and the Space Force. This extended period can be beneficial for complex projects requiring sustained effort and continuity. However, it also presents challenges. Requirements may evolve significantly over five years, potentially leading to scope creep or the need for contract modifications. Furthermore, maintaining contractor performance at a high level for an extended duration requires continuous oversight and performance management to prevent complacency or a decline in service quality. The long duration necessitates robust mechanisms for adapting to changing needs and ensuring ongoing value.

What is the significance of the NAICS code 541330 (Engineering Services) in the context of this contract?

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541330, 'Engineering Services,' signifies that the contract is for professional services provided by engineers. This typically includes activities such as designing, developing, and testing new products and processes, as well as providing expert advice and consultation on engineering matters. For the US SPACE FORCE, this code indicates that the contract is intended to procure specialized technical expertise crucial for the development, maintenance, or enhancement of space and missile systems. It distinguishes this contract from other types of services, such as IT support or construction, and helps in categorizing federal spending for analytical and benchmarking purposes.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: ID08200035

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5701 CLEVELAND ST STE 220A, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA, 23462

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Joint Venture Women Owned Small Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $51,644,832

Exercised Options: $22,480,199

Current Obligation: $21,991,978

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QRAD20D1073

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline