Leidos, Inc. awarded $141.38M Army engineering services contract by GSA
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $141,380,932 ($141.4M)
Contractor: Leidos, Inc.
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2023-04-01
End Date: 2026-03-31
Contract Duration: 1,095 days
Daily Burn Rate: $129.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: TO8 OY1 STANDING ARMY
Place of Performance
Location: HICKAM AFB, HONOLULU County, HAWAII, 96853
State: Hawaii Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $141.4 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: TO8 OY1 STANDING ARMY Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is a delivery order under a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicle. 3. Services are for engineering, with a primary NAICS code of 541330. 4. The contract has a duration of 1095 days, spanning three years. 5. The contract is firm-fixed-price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 6. No small business set-aside was indicated for this specific award.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
Benchmarking the value of this specific delivery order is challenging without knowing the scope of the underlying IDIQ contract and the specific services rendered. However, the firm-fixed-price structure is generally favorable for the government as it caps costs. The total award amount of over $141 million for three years of engineering services suggests a significant scope of work. Further analysis would require comparing the per-unit costs or labor rates to similar engineering contracts awarded by the Army or other federal agencies.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this method of procurement generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The use of a delivery order under an IDIQ suggests that the initial competition occurred when the IDIQ was awarded, and this delivery order was then competed or awarded based on pre-established terms.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is the preferred method for government contracting as it maximizes opportunities for businesses and typically results in the best value for taxpayers by encouraging competitive pricing.
Public Impact
The U.S. Army is the primary beneficiary, receiving essential engineering services. These services are critical for supporting military operations and infrastructure. The contract is geographically focused on Hawaii (SN: HAWAII). The contract supports the defense industrial base and potentially a specialized engineering workforce.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific details on the number of bidders limits the assessment of competitive intensity.
- The underlying IDIQ contract's competition level is not detailed here, impacting the full picture of market engagement.
- Potential for cost overruns if the scope of work expands beyond initial estimates, despite the FFP structure.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract type transfers cost risk to the contractor.
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
- Long-term nature of the contract (3 years) provides stability for service delivery.
Sector Analysis
Engineering services, particularly those supporting defense, represent a significant segment of the federal contracting market. The NAICS code 541330 (Engineering Services) encompasses a broad range of activities, from civil and mechanical to electrical and aerospace engineering. Federal spending in this sector is driven by national security needs, infrastructure projects, and research and development. This contract fits within the broader category of defense-related engineering support, where large, established firms like Leidos often compete for substantial awards.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside (SB: false). This suggests that the primary award went to a large business. There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans or goals for small businesses within this specific delivery order. Without this information, it is difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this particular contract, though large prime contractors are often encouraged or required to subcontract with small businesses on larger federal awards.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the General Services Administration (GSA) and the U.S. Army contracting officers. As a delivery order under an IDIQ, the underlying contract vehicle likely has established oversight mechanisms. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of cost control. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General (IG) jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Army Engineering Services Contracts
- GSA Federal Acquisition Service Contracts
- Defense Engineering Support IDIQs
- Engineering Services for Military Installations
- Large Prime Contractor Awards
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep if not managed tightly.
- Logistical challenges associated with performance in Hawaii.
- Reliance on specific technical expertise which may be in high demand.
Tags
engineering-services, defense, army, gsa, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, leidos-inc, hawaii, large-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $141.4 million to LEIDOS, INC.. TO8 OY1 STANDING ARMY
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $141.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-04-01. End: 2026-03-31.
What is the historical spending pattern for engineering services under the specific IDIQ vehicle this delivery order falls under?
To provide a comprehensive answer, we would need the specific IDIQ contract number. However, generally, historical spending patterns under large IDIQ vehicles for engineering services can vary significantly based on agency needs, program priorities, and the overall defense budget. For a contract like this, awarded by GSA to support the Army, historical data might show consistent demand for engineering expertise in areas such as infrastructure design, modernization, environmental compliance, and operational support. Analyzing past delivery orders under the same IDIQ would reveal trends in award values, task orders issued, and the types of engineering disciplines most frequently procured. This context helps in understanding if the current $141.38 million award represents a typical or an exceptional level of spending for this particular vehicle.
How does the awarded amount compare to other similar engineering services contracts awarded to Leidos, Inc. by the federal government?
Leidos, Inc. is a major federal contractor, frequently awarded large contracts across various sectors, including defense and engineering. The $141.38 million award for engineering services over three years is substantial but falls within the range of large-scale contracts typically awarded to companies of Leidos's size and expertise. To provide a precise comparison, one would need to analyze Leidos's contract portfolio, looking at other engineering services contracts with similar scope, duration, and agency (e.g., Army, Navy, Air Force). For instance, contracts for base operations support, facility design, or specialized technical engineering could be comparable. Without direct access to a comparative database filtered for Leidos's engineering contracts, it's reasonable to infer that this award is significant but not an outlier given Leidos's market position.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract?
Specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) are typically detailed within the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS), which are not provided in the summary data. However, for engineering services contracts, common KPIs often relate to project timelines, adherence to design specifications, quality of deliverables (e.g., accuracy of blueprints, reports), cost control within approved budgets (even under FFP, managing scope is key), safety compliance during any on-site work, and responsiveness to task orders. SLAs might address response times for technical queries, turnaround times for design reviews, or availability of key personnel. The firm-fixed-price nature implies that meeting these performance standards is crucial for the contractor to achieve profitability.
What is the risk profile of Leidos, Inc. as a contractor for this type of service?
Leidos, Inc. generally carries a low to moderate risk profile as a federal contractor, given its extensive experience, established infrastructure, and history of performance across numerous large government contracts. For engineering services, risks can include technical challenges, schedule delays, cost overruns (though mitigated by FFP), and personnel availability. Leidos's size and resources typically enable them to manage these risks effectively. Past performance data, available through government databases like the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), would provide a more granular view of their specific risk factors related to quality, schedule, cost, and management. However, as a major defense contractor, they are accustomed to operating in complex environments.
How does the geographic focus on Hawaii impact the contract's execution and potential costs?
A geographic focus on Hawaii introduces specific logistical and operational considerations that can impact contract execution and costs. Hawaii's island location means increased costs for shipping materials, equipment, and personnel to and from the mainland. Travel expenses for non-local staff can be significantly higher. Furthermore, local labor rates may differ from mainland averages. Environmental regulations and permitting processes in Hawaii can also be unique and potentially more stringent, requiring specialized knowledge. The presence of a large military infrastructure in Hawaii also means a potentially competitive labor market for skilled engineers. The contractor must factor these elements into their pricing and project planning to ensure successful and cost-effective delivery.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: 47QFPA23Q0004
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Address: 1750 PRESIDENTS ST, RESTON, VA, 20190
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $141,380,932
Exercised Options: $141,380,932
Current Obligation: $141,380,932
Actual Outlays: $-24
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 203
Total Subaward Amount: $85,552,315
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 47QFPA22D0003
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-04-01
Current End Date: 2026-03-31
Potential End Date: 2027-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-02-18
More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)