GSA awards $2.25M for elevator maintenance, re-establishing a prior contract for Washington D.C. facilities
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,252,379 ($2.3M)
Contractor: TK Elevator Corporation
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2023-08-01
End Date: 2026-07-31
Contract Duration: 1,095 days
Daily Burn Rate: $2.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: THIS AWARD RE-ESTABLISHES BPA CALL 47PD0321F0019 AGAINST BPA 47PD0321A0008 FOR MAINTENANCE SERVICE AT NCR GROUP 1 IN WASHINGTON, DC.
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20011
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $2.3 million to TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION for work described as: THIS AWARD RE-ESTABLISHES BPA CALL 47PD0321F0019 AGAINST BPA 47PD0321A0008 FOR MAINTENANCE SERVICE AT NCR GROUP 1 IN WASHINGTON, DC. Key points: 1. The contract value appears reasonable for a multi-year maintenance agreement of this nature. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of three years provides stability for service delivery. 4. This award continues a previous agreement, indicating a known service provider and established needs. 5. The service is critical for building operations and accessibility in federal facilities. 6. The fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The award amount of $2.25 million over three years for elevator maintenance services at the NCR Group 1 facilities in Washington D.C. seems aligned with industry standards for such services. While specific benchmarks for this exact scope are not readily available, multi-year maintenance contracts for complex building systems typically represent a significant investment. The firm-fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor has assumed the risk for cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator of value if the contractor performs efficiently. Further analysis would require comparing this to similar GSA contracts for elevator maintenance in the region.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The data does not specify the number of bidders, but the use of full and open competition generally promotes a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings for the government. This approach allows the agency to select the best value proposal based on a range of factors, not solely price.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition through potentially lower prices and higher quality services due to a wider pool of bidders vying for the contract.
Public Impact
Federal employees and visitors benefit from safe and reliable elevator operations within NCR Group 1 facilities. Essential building services, including vertical transportation, are maintained, ensuring accessibility and functionality. The geographic impact is concentrated in Washington D.C., supporting federal operations in the nation's capital. The contract supports jobs within the elevator maintenance and repair industry.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for price increases in future re-competitions if market conditions change.
- Reliance on a single contractor for a critical building system could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
Positive Signals
- Re-establishment of a BPA call indicates a successful prior relationship and potentially stable service.
- Full and open competition suggests a robust process for selecting the contractor.
- Firm-fixed-price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.
Sector Analysis
The elevator maintenance and repair industry is a vital component of the building services sector, supporting the operational integrity of commercial and government facilities. This contract falls under the broader category of building equipment contractors. Spending in this sector is driven by the need for ongoing maintenance, repair, and modernization of essential building systems. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other government contracts for similar maintenance services across different agencies and geographic locations, as well as private sector industry data on maintenance costs for commercial properties.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that small business set-asides were not utilized for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests the contract was not specifically targeted towards small businesses. There is no information on subcontracting plans. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities.
Oversight & Accountability
The General Services Administration (GSA) typically employs various oversight mechanisms for its contracts, including performance monitoring and contract administration. The Public Buildings Service (PBS) is responsible for managing federal real estate and ensuring services like this are delivered effectively. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any issues of fraud, waste, or abuse arise during the contract performance period.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
- General Services Administration (GSA) Contracts
- Elevator and Escalator Maintenance Services
- Building Equipment Contractors
Risk Flags
- Potential for service disruption if contractor performance degrades.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in provided data.
- Limited insight into the number of bidders for this full and open competition.
Tags
sector-other, agency-gsa, geography-district-of-columbia, contract-type-bpa-call, size-category-unknown, competition-level-full-and-open, service-maintenance, building-equipment, federal-facilities
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $2.3 million to TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION. THIS AWARD RE-ESTABLISHES BPA CALL 47PD0321F0019 AGAINST BPA 47PD0321A0008 FOR MAINTENANCE SERVICE AT NCR GROUP 1 IN WASHINGTON, DC.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-08-01. End: 2026-07-31.
What is the historical spending pattern for elevator maintenance services at GSA's NCR Group 1 facilities?
The provided data indicates this award re-establishes BPA Call 47PD0321F0019 against BPA 47PD0321A0008. This suggests a prior contract existed for similar services. To understand the historical spending pattern, one would need to examine the value and duration of the previous BPA call and any preceding contracts for elevator maintenance at these specific facilities. Without access to that historical data, it's difficult to establish a trend. However, the current award of $2.25 million over three years provides a recent data point for ongoing expenditure in this category for the NCR Group 1 facilities.
How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar elevator maintenance contracts awarded by GSA or other federal agencies?
Benchmarking the pricing of this $2.25 million, three-year contract requires comparison with similar firm-fixed-price contracts for elevator maintenance services, ideally within the Washington D.C. metropolitan area and for facilities of comparable size and complexity. The data provided does not include the number of bidders or specific service details (e.g., number of elevators, types of service included), which are crucial for an accurate comparison. However, the use of full and open competition suggests that the pricing was evaluated against market rates. A detailed analysis would involve querying contract databases for comparable awards and analyzing factors like cost per elevator, cost per square foot maintained, or annual maintenance cost as a percentage of replacement value.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this elevator maintenance contract?
The provided data does not explicitly list the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this specific contract. However, typical KPIs for elevator maintenance contracts often include response times for emergency calls, preventative maintenance completion rates, equipment uptime/availability, customer satisfaction ratings (from facility occupants), and adherence to safety standards. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract implies that the contractor is incentivized to meet these performance standards to avoid penalties or ensure profitability. The GSA likely has standard performance metrics outlined in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) that would be used for oversight.
What is the track record of TK Elevator Corporation in performing similar federal contracts?
TK Elevator Corporation is a known entity in the elevator services industry. To assess their track record specifically for federal contracts, a review of their past performance on similar awards with GSA and other agencies would be necessary. This would involve examining contract databases for previous awards, checking past performance evaluations (if publicly available), and looking for any documented instances of contract disputes, terminations, or outstanding performance issues. Given that this award re-establishes a prior BPA call, it suggests a potentially positive or at least acceptable performance history on the previous contract.
What is the potential risk associated with relying on a single contractor for critical elevator maintenance in federal buildings?
The primary risk associated with relying on a single contractor for critical elevator maintenance is service disruption. If the contractor experiences financial difficulties, labor shortages, or management issues, it could lead to delays in essential repairs or preventative maintenance, impacting building operations and accessibility. Furthermore, a lack of competition in future re-procurements could potentially lead to higher costs. However, the firm-fixed-price contract structure and the established nature of the elevator services industry mitigate some of these risks by incentivizing the contractor to maintain service levels and by providing a competitive market for future contract awards.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Building Equipment Contractors › Other Building Equipment Contractors
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 4355 EXCEL PKWY STE 800, ADDISON, TX, 75001
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Foreign Owned, Foreign-Owned and U.S.-Incorporated Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $8,417,679
Exercised Options: $2,252,379
Current Obligation: $2,252,379
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 47PD0321A0008
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-08-01
Current End Date: 2026-07-31
Potential End Date: 2031-07-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-20
More Contracts from TK Elevator Corporation
- TAS::17 1106::TAS Elevator Maintenance and Repair AT Various Locations in Southern California — $18.4M (Department of Defense)
- Elevator Modernization Lafayette, 811 Vermont AVE. N.W. Washington D.C — $13.8M (General Services Administration)
- BPA Call NO. 47PN1123F0018 Re-Established BPA Call NO. 47PD0321F0017, Against Elevator Maintenance Services BPA NO. 47PD0321A0006 AT NCR Group 1 in Washington, DC — $2.7M (General Services Administration)
- Construction Project for the Modernization of 4 Existing Judges Elevators AT the Hale Boggs Federal Courthouse 500 Poydras Street, NEW Orleans, LA 70130 — $2.6M (General Services Administration)
- General Services Administration's Elevator Modernization Albuquerque Federal Building and Courthouse, 421 Gold AVE SW, Albuquerque, NM — $1.0M (General Services Administration)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)