GSA awards $5.4M for Denver Federal Center building upgrades to A Hole in the Wall Construction

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,427,203 ($5.4M)

Contractor: A Hole in the Wall Construction

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2024-05-01

End Date: 2026-08-31

Contract Duration: 852 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: AWARD FOR THE BUILDING 810 UPGRADES AND BUILDOUT DESIGN BUILD OUT AT THE DENVER FEDERAL CENTER, LAKEWOOD, COLORADO

Place of Performance

Location: DENVER, JEFFERSON County, COLORADO, 80225

State: Colorado Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $5.4 million to A HOLE IN THE WALL CONSTRUCTION for work described as: AWARD FOR THE BUILDING 810 UPGRADES AND BUILDOUT DESIGN BUILD OUT AT THE DENVER FEDERAL CENTER, LAKEWOOD, COLORADO Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a design-build project of this scope. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Project duration of 852 days is substantial, indicating a complex undertaking. 4. The fixed-price contract type shifts risk to the contractor. 5. This project supports infrastructure modernization at a key federal facility.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The award of $5.4 million for the Building 810 upgrades and buildout at the Denver Federal Center seems within a reasonable range for a design-build project of this nature. Benchmarking against similar federal building renovation projects of comparable size and complexity would provide a more precise value assessment. The firm fixed-price contract structure indicates that the contractor bears the primary financial risk for cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. While the specific number of bids received is not detailed, this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which is expected to lead to better pricing and value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition increases the likelihood that taxpayer funds are used efficiently by driving down prices through market forces.

Public Impact

Federal employees working at the Denver Federal Center will benefit from modernized facilities. The project will deliver essential upgrades and buildout for Building 810. The geographic impact is concentrated in Lakewood, Colorado. The construction workforce in the Denver metropolitan area will be engaged.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if design-build elements are not tightly managed.
Contractor's past performance record needs thorough review to ensure successful project completion.
Coordination between design and construction phases is critical for timely delivery.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract mitigates cost overrun risk for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process.
Project addresses necessary infrastructure improvements at a federal facility.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a vital part of the broader construction industry. Federal spending in this area supports the maintenance and modernization of government facilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other federal building renovation or construction contracts managed by agencies like GSA, focusing on cost per square foot or cost per project phase.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). While this was a full and open competition, the prime contractor, A Hole in the Wall Construction, may still engage small businesses as subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business subcontracting and its impact on the local small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically its Public Buildings Service. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to deliver the specified scope within budget. Transparency is generally maintained through federal contract databases, and any Inspector General involvement would depend on reported issues or audits.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Renovations
Design-Build Construction Contracts
GSA Facility Modernization Programs
Denver Federal Center Operations

Risk Flags

Contractor Past Performance
Scope Definition Clarity
Potential for Cost Overruns (mitigated by FFP)
Schedule Adherence

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $5.4 million to A HOLE IN THE WALL CONSTRUCTION. AWARD FOR THE BUILDING 810 UPGRADES AND BUILDOUT DESIGN BUILD OUT AT THE DENVER FEDERAL CENTER, LAKEWOOD, COLORADO

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is A HOLE IN THE WALL CONSTRUCTION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-05-01. End: 2026-08-31.

What is the track record of A Hole in the Wall Construction with federal contracts, particularly for projects of similar size and scope?

A review of federal contract databases would be necessary to fully assess A Hole in the Wall Construction's track record. Key metrics to examine include the number of previous federal awards, their value, the types of services rendered (e.g., design-build, construction management), and their performance ratings. Specifically, looking for experience with projects at federal centers or similar large-scale institutional buildings would be crucial. Any history of contract modifications, disputes, or performance issues would be significant risk indicators. Without specific past performance data, it's difficult to definitively gauge their capability for this $5.4 million project, though the award suggests they met initial qualification criteria.

How does the $5.4 million award compare to the estimated cost or budget for the Building 810 upgrades and buildout?

The provided data only includes the award amount ($5,427,203.21), not the initial estimated cost or the allocated budget for the Building 810 upgrades and buildout. To assess value for money, a comparison between the award amount and the government's independent government cost estimate (IGCE) is essential. If the award is significantly below the IGCE, it could indicate strong competition or potentially an underestimated scope by the government. Conversely, if the award is at or above the IGCE, it warrants closer scrutiny to ensure the price reflects fair market value. Without the IGCE, a definitive statement on whether this represents excellent or questionable value is not possible.

What are the primary risks associated with a design-build contract for federal building renovations?

Design-build contracts, while offering potential efficiencies, carry specific risks. A primary risk is the integration of design and construction responsibilities under a single entity, which can sometimes lead to coordination challenges or disputes if not managed meticulously. For the government, risks include ensuring the design meets all functional requirements and building codes, as the contractor is responsible for both. Scope creep is another significant risk; if the initial design is not clearly defined or if changes are introduced, costs can escalate, although the firm fixed-price nature of this contract aims to mitigate that for the government. Contractor performance risk, including quality of work and adherence to schedule, is also present, necessitating robust oversight and performance monitoring.

What is the historical spending pattern for facility upgrades and construction at the Denver Federal Center?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for facility upgrades and construction at the Denver Federal Center would provide context for the current $5.4 million award. This would involve querying federal spending databases for previous contracts awarded to maintain, renovate, or build facilities at this specific location. Key data points to examine would include the frequency of such contracts, their average value, the types of projects undertaken (e.g., HVAC upgrades, structural repairs, office buildouts), and the agencies or services responsible for awarding them. Understanding past investment levels can help determine if the current award represents a significant increase, a continuation of a trend, or a one-off major expenditure, informing assessments of ongoing infrastructure needs and budget allocation.

How does the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' procurement method impact price discovery and potential savings?

The 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method is a standard and generally preferred approach for federal procurements. It signifies that the agency sought offers from all responsible prospective contractors, but may have initially excluded certain sources based on pre-defined criteria (e.g., specific certifications, past performance thresholds) before opening it up. This method is designed to maximize competition by allowing a broad range of qualified bidders to participate. A higher number of bids typically leads to more robust price discovery, as contractors compete more intensely to win the contract. This increased competition is expected to drive down prices, resulting in better value for taxpayer dollars compared to less competitive methods like sole-source or limited competition procurements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47PJ0023R0122

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6669 COLORADO BLVD UNIT B, COMMERCE CITY, CO, 80022

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Hispanic American Owned Business, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $5,427,203

Exercised Options: $5,427,203

Current Obligation: $5,427,203

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PJ0021D0031

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline