Titan Facility Services LLC awarded $4.1M for San Diego Federal Building Operations, highlighting facilities support services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,136,249 ($4.1M)

Contractor: Titan Facility Services LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-12-01

End Date: 2026-11-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: O&M AND VTE AT THE SAN DIEGO DOWNTOWN FEDERAL BUILDINGS, SAN DIEGO, CA.

Place of Performance

Location: SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92101

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $4.1 million to TITAN FACILITY SERVICES LLC for work described as: O&M AND VTE AT THE SAN DIEGO DOWNTOWN FEDERAL BUILDINGS, SAN DIEGO, CA. Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a multi-year facilities support agreement. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for these services. 3. Fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. 4. Contract duration of one year with options provides flexibility. 5. Services are essential for maintaining federal property in a major urban center. 6. Geographic focus on San Diego ensures localized service delivery.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $4.1 million for a one-year period for facilities support services at federal buildings in San Diego appears to be within a reasonable range for the scope of work. Benchmarking against similar contracts for large federal building complexes would provide a more precise assessment, but the fixed-price nature suggests an effort to control costs. The General Services Administration (GSA) typically manages such contracts with established pricing structures.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. This approach generally fosters a competitive environment, encouraging multiple bidders to vie for the contract. The number of bidders is not specified, but the method of competition suggests a robust market for facilities support services in the San Diego area.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider range of service options, maximizing the value received for public funds.

Public Impact

Federal employees and the public utilizing San Diego's downtown federal buildings will benefit from maintained and operational facilities. Essential services include operations and maintenance, ensuring the safety, security, and functionality of critical government infrastructure. The geographic impact is concentrated in downtown San Diego, supporting the local federal presence. The contract supports jobs within the facilities management and maintenance sector in the San Diego region.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if not clearly defined in the base contract and task orders.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical building operations could pose a risk if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract type helps control costs and provides budget certainty.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive market, likely leading to better pricing and service quality.
Contract duration allows for stable service provision over the period.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of buildings and infrastructure. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210, Facilities Support Services, covers establishments primarily engaged in operating and maintaining buildings with associated utilities and services. Spending in this sector is substantial across the federal government, supporting everything from janitorial services to complex building systems management.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a set-aside provision. However, the prime contractor, Titan Facility Services LLC, may engage small businesses as subcontractors, depending on their own business practices and the specific requirements of the contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for overseeing this contract. Oversight mechanisms likely include regular performance reviews, site inspections, and adherence to contract terms and conditions. Accountability is ensured through the fixed-price contract structure and performance metrics. Transparency is generally maintained through GSA's contract award databases and reporting, though specific operational oversight details are internal.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Operations and Maintenance
GSA Facilities Management Contracts
Public Buildings Service Contracts
Facilities Support Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Contractor performance history needs verification.
Potential for cost overruns if scope is not tightly managed.
Dependence on a single provider for critical infrastructure.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $4.1 million to TITAN FACILITY SERVICES LLC. O&M AND VTE AT THE SAN DIEGO DOWNTOWN FEDERAL BUILDINGS, SAN DIEGO, CA.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TITAN FACILITY SERVICES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-12-01. End: 2026-11-30.

What is the track record of Titan Facility Services LLC with the federal government, particularly in similar facilities support contracts?

A review of federal procurement data would be necessary to fully assess Titan Facility Services LLC's track record. Key indicators would include the number and value of previous federal contracts awarded, the agencies they have served, and their performance ratings on past contracts. Specifically, examining their history with the General Services Administration (GSA) and for similar facilities support services (NAICS 561210) would provide relevant context. A history of successful contract completion, positive performance reviews, and minimal disputes or contract terminations would indicate a reliable contractor. Conversely, a pattern of performance issues or contract disputes might raise concerns about their capacity to fulfill the current San Diego contract effectively.

How does the awarded price of $4.1 million compare to market rates for similar facilities support services in San Diego?

To benchmark the $4.1 million award, one would need to compare it against the pricing of similar facilities support contracts in the San Diego metropolitan area. This would involve analyzing contract databases for awards with comparable scopes of work, building sizes, and service levels (e.g., O&M, janitorial, security, HVAC maintenance). Factors such as the duration of the contract (one year base period), the type of federal facilities supported, and the specific services included are crucial for a fair comparison. Without access to detailed market analysis or a comprehensive list of comparable contracts, it is difficult to definitively state whether this price represents excellent, fair, or questionable value. However, the fact that it was awarded under full and open competition suggests that the price was deemed competitive by the GSA.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

Primary risks for this contract include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor, leading to disruptions in federal building operations, and unforeseen cost increases if the fixed-price contract does not adequately cover all eventualities. Another risk could be the contractor's financial stability or capacity to manage the contract effectively over its term. Mitigation strategies typically employed by the GSA include rigorous pre-award evaluations of contractor capabilities, clearly defined performance standards and metrics within the contract, regular performance monitoring, and the inclusion of contract clauses that allow for remedies in case of non-performance. The fixed-price nature itself acts as a cost control measure, shifting some of the financial risk to the contractor.

What is the expected effectiveness of these facilities support services in ensuring the optimal functioning of the San Diego federal buildings?

The effectiveness of these facilities support services is expected to be high, provided Titan Facility Services LLC performs according to the contract's requirements. These services are critical for maintaining a safe, secure, and functional environment for federal employees and the public. This includes ensuring reliable operation of essential building systems (HVAC, electrical, plumbing), maintaining cleanliness and sanitation, and addressing maintenance needs promptly to prevent disruptions. The General Services Administration (GSA) typically sets stringent performance standards for such contracts, and their effectiveness is measured through performance evaluations and user feedback. A well-executed contract should lead to minimal downtime, high occupant satisfaction, and compliance with all relevant building codes and safety regulations.

How does historical spending on facilities support services by the GSA in San Diego compare to this contract's value?

To assess historical spending patterns, one would need to analyze GSA's procurement data for facilities support services in the San Diego region over previous years. This analysis should identify trends in contract values, the number of contracts awarded, and the types of services procured. Comparing the $4.1 million value of this current contract against historical averages and ranges for similar services in the same geographic area would provide context. For instance, if historical spending for comparable contracts has consistently been in the $3-5 million range annually, this award would appear consistent. Significant deviations, either higher or lower, might warrant further investigation into the specific scope of services or market conditions influencing the price.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: EQ9PMF-26-0002

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2954 E CLIFTON AVE, GILBERT, AZ, 85295

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,220,393

Exercised Options: $4,136,249

Current Obligation: $4,136,249

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PK0226A0001

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline