GSA awards $30,904 contract for electrical breaker repair at San Diego courthouse

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $30,904 ($30.9K)

Contractor: Titan Facility Services LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-07

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 84 days

Daily Burn Rate: $368/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: THIS PROJECT IS FOR THE REPAIR AND RECONDITIONING OF ELECTRICAL BREAKERS AT THE SCHWARTZ COURTHOUSE, 880 FRONT STREET, SAN DIEGO, CA 92101.

Place of Performance

Location: SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92101

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $30,904.15 to TITAN FACILITY SERVICES LLC for work described as: THIS PROJECT IS FOR THE REPAIR AND RECONDITIONING OF ELECTRICAL BREAKERS AT THE SCHWARTZ COURTHOUSE, 880 FRONT STREET, SAN DIEGO, CA 92101. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on essential facility maintenance for a federal courthouse. 2. Awarded through a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call, indicating pre-negotiated terms. 3. The firm-fixed-price structure shifts cost risk to the contractor. 4. Contract duration is relatively short, suggesting a specific, defined scope of work. 5. No small business set-aside was utilized for this procurement. 6. The service falls under Facilities Support Services, a broad category.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $30,904 for electrical breaker repair appears reasonable for a localized, short-term maintenance task. Benchmarking against similar facility maintenance contracts for federal courthouses of comparable size and scope would provide a more precise value assessment. However, given the specific nature of the repair and the firm-fixed-price contract type, the pricing is likely competitive and reflects market rates for specialized electrical services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific mechanism used was a BPA Call, which implies that Titan Facility Services LLC was selected from a pre-existing pool of qualified contractors established through a broader BPA. The level of competition within the BPA call itself is not detailed, but the initial BPA likely involved a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for taxpayers, as it encourages a wider range of vendors to submit proposals.

Public Impact

The Schwartz Courthouse in San Diego will benefit from maintained electrical systems, ensuring operational continuity. This contract supports essential infrastructure maintenance for a federal judicial facility. The services delivered will ensure the safety and reliability of electrical breaker systems. The geographic impact is localized to the San Diego courthouse. The contract supports the facilities management workforce, likely through Titan Facility Services LLC's employees.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited competition if the BPA call process did not yield numerous responsive bids.
Scope creep could increase costs if unforeseen issues arise beyond the initial repair scope.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract limits cost overruns for the government.
Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
Short duration indicates a focused and manageable project.

Sector Analysis

The Facilities Support Services sector encompasses a wide range of services essential for the operation and maintenance of government buildings. This contract, specifically for electrical breaker repair, falls within the specialized maintenance sub-sector. The market for such services is typically fragmented, with numerous small to medium-sized businesses offering specialized skills. Government spending in this area is consistent, driven by the need to maintain aging federal infrastructure across various agencies.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned in the provided data. Titan Facility Services LLC is the prime contractor. Further analysis would be needed to determine if Titan Facility Services LLC itself is a small business or if they intend to utilize small business subcontractors, which would impact the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service, which manages federal real estate. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability by fixing the cost. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award being publicly available. Inspector General oversight would apply if any issues of fraud, waste, or abuse arise.

Related Government Programs

Federal Courthouse Maintenance Contracts
GSA Facilities Management Services
Electrical Infrastructure Repair
Public Buildings Service Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep
Dependence on contractor's specific expertise

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $30,904.15 to TITAN FACILITY SERVICES LLC. THIS PROJECT IS FOR THE REPAIR AND RECONDITIONING OF ELECTRICAL BREAKERS AT THE SCHWARTZ COURTHOUSE, 880 FRONT STREET, SAN DIEGO, CA 92101.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TITAN FACILITY SERVICES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $30,904.15.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-07. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the track record of Titan Facility Services LLC in performing similar electrical repair services for federal facilities?

Information regarding Titan Facility Services LLC's specific track record for federal electrical repair services is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing their past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), other federal contract awards, and any reported issues or commendations. Understanding their experience with similar courthouse environments and electrical systems would be crucial for evaluating their capability and reliability on this specific project. Without this data, the assessment relies on the assumption that the GSA conducted due diligence during the BPA and call award process.

How does the awarded amount compare to the estimated cost or budget for this repair project?

The provided data does not include the estimated cost or budget for this electrical breaker repair project. The awarded amount is $30,904.15. To assess value for money, this figure would need to be compared against internal GSA cost estimates, historical spending on similar repairs at this facility or comparable facilities, and potentially bids from other vendors if available through the BPA call process. A firm-fixed-price contract suggests the government aimed to secure a defined cost, but without a benchmark, it's difficult to definitively state if it represents optimal value.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Key risks include potential delays in repair completion, which could impact courthouse operations, and the possibility of unforeseen issues arising during the repair that exceed the initial scope. Mitigation strategies include the firm-fixed-price contract, which caps the government's financial exposure and incentivizes the contractor to manage costs. The short contract duration (approx. 2 months) also limits the window for significant delays. The GSA's oversight and the contractor's presumed experience in facilities maintenance are also risk mitigation factors. However, the specific technical complexity of the breakers and the courthouse environment could introduce unique risks.

What is the expected impact of this contract on the operational effectiveness of the Schwartz Courthouse?

This contract is expected to have a positive impact on the operational effectiveness of the Schwartz Courthouse by ensuring the reliable functioning of its electrical breaker systems. Properly maintained electrical infrastructure is critical for powering all courthouse functions, including lighting, security systems, IT equipment, and climate control. By addressing necessary repairs and reconditioning, this contract helps prevent potential disruptions, power outages, or equipment failures that could hinder judicial proceedings, staff work, and public access. The timely completion of this work will contribute to a safe and functional environment.

What has been the historical spending pattern for facilities maintenance at the Schwartz Courthouse or similar GSA-managed courthouses?

The provided data does not contain historical spending patterns for facilities maintenance at the Schwartz Courthouse or similar GSA-managed courthouses. To establish such a pattern, one would need to analyze past GSA contracts related to building operations, maintenance, repairs, and upgrades for this specific facility and a cohort of comparable federal courthouses. This analysis would reveal trends in spending frequency, types of services procured, average contract values, and contractor performance over time. Such historical data is essential for benchmarking current contract values and identifying potential anomalies or efficiencies.

Are there any specific performance standards or metrics outlined in the contract for the repair work?

The provided data does not specify the performance standards or metrics included in the contract. Typically, federal contracts for facility maintenance include clauses related to quality of work, timeliness of completion, safety protocols, and adherence to relevant building codes and regulations. For electrical repairs, specific metrics might involve testing procedures post-repair, warranty periods for parts and labor, and compliance with industry standards (e.g., NEC). The effectiveness of oversight by the GSA would depend on the clarity and enforceability of these performance requirements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: EQPMBE-26-0094

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2954 E CLIFTON AVE, GILBERT, AZ, 85295

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $30,904

Exercised Options: $30,904

Current Obligation: $30,904

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PK0226A0001

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline