GSA's Vermont Facilities Support Services BPA Call Option Year 3 Awarded to DAE SUNG LLC for $1.98M

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $1,975,812 ($2.0M)

Contractor: DAE Sung LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-11-01

End Date: 2026-10-31

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) CALL 47PF5225F0001, VERMONT COMBINED SERVICES, OPTION YEAR 3

Place of Performance

Location: BURLINGTON, CHITTENDEN County, VERMONT, 05401

State: Vermont Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $2.0 million to DAE SUNG LLC for work described as: BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) CALL 47PF5225F0001, VERMONT COMBINED SERVICES, OPTION YEAR 3 Key points: 1. This contract represents a continuation of services, suggesting a stable performance history for the incumbent. 2. The firm-fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government, shifting performance risk to the contractor. 3. The award was made under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 4. Facilities Support Services are critical for maintaining government infrastructure and operational readiness. 5. The contract's duration of one year aligns with typical option year structures for service contracts. 6. The geographic focus on Vermont suggests localized service delivery and potential impact on the regional economy.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $1.98 million for one year of facilities support services in Vermont appears reasonable, especially considering it's an option year for an existing Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call. Without specific details on the scope of services or comparable contracts in the immediate region, a precise benchmark is difficult. However, the firm-fixed-price nature suggests that the pricing was determined through a competitive process, which generally leads to better value. The General Services Administration (GSA) typically manages its contracts with a focus on achieving fair and reasonable pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This suggests a robust bidding environment where multiple companies had the opportunity to compete for the contract. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation implies that the government sought the best possible offer through a competitive solicitation process, which is generally favorable for price discovery and achieving market-based pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces. This approach maximizes the opportunity to secure services at a fair and reasonable price.

Public Impact

Federal facilities in Vermont will continue to receive essential maintenance and support services, ensuring operational continuity. The contract supports the General Services Administration's mission to manage federal property and provide workspace solutions. Local workforce in Vermont may benefit from continued employment opportunities within DAE SUNG LLC or its subcontractors. Government agencies operating within the service area will experience reliable facility operations, supporting their core missions.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if the definition of 'facilities support services' is not clearly delineated.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical facility operations could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
The firm-fixed-price contract may limit flexibility if unforeseen operational needs emerge that require additional services.

Positive Signals

The continuation of services under an existing BPA Call suggests a successful prior performance and established working relationship.
The firm-fixed-price contract provides budget certainty and shifts performance risk to the contractor.
Award under full and open competition indicates a competitive market and potential for good value.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services fall under the broader Commercial and Institutional Building Maintenance industry. This sector is characterized by a wide range of services including cleaning, maintenance, repair, and operational support for various types of buildings. The market is diverse, with many small and medium-sized businesses alongside larger national providers. Government contracts, particularly those managed by GSA, represent a significant portion of this market, often requiring adherence to strict performance standards and competitive bidding processes. Benchmarks for similar GSA contracts often focus on cost per square foot or cost per service hour, but these vary widely by location and service complexity.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a small business set-aside. However, the prime contractor, DAE SUNG LLC, may still engage small businesses as subcontractors to fulfill the contract requirements, depending on their own business practices and the nature of the services required. Analysis of subcontracting plans would be necessary to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) typically employs robust oversight mechanisms for its contracts. This includes contract administration by the Public Buildings Service (PBS), performance monitoring, and adherence to established service level agreements. The firm-fixed-price contract structure inherently places performance accountability on the contractor. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

GSA Federal Buildings Fund
Facilities Maintenance and Operations Contracts
Government Property Management Services
Commercial Building Maintenance Services

Risk Flags

Potential for contractor performance issues impacting essential services.
Limited flexibility under firm-fixed-price contract for unforeseen needs.
Dependence on a single vendor for critical facility operations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $2.0 million to DAE SUNG LLC. BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) CALL 47PF5225F0001, VERMONT COMBINED SERVICES, OPTION YEAR 3

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DAE SUNG LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-11-01. End: 2026-10-31.

What is the historical spending trend for this specific BPA Call or similar facilities support services contracts managed by GSA in Vermont?

Analyzing historical spending for this BPA Call (47PF5225F0001) and similar facilities support services contracts managed by GSA in Vermont is crucial for understanding cost trends and budget predictability. While the current award is for $1.98 million for Option Year 3, previous years' spending data would reveal if costs have escalated, remained stable, or decreased. For instance, if previous option years were awarded at significantly lower amounts, it might indicate inflationary pressures or an expansion of services. Conversely, stable or decreasing costs could suggest effective cost management or competitive pricing. Benchmarking against other GSA facilities support contracts in similar geographic regions (e.g., New England states) would provide further context on whether Vermont's pricing is aligned with national averages or regional norms. Without access to the specific historical award data for this BPA Call, a definitive trend analysis is not possible, but such data is typically available through federal procurement databases.

How does the per-unit cost of these facilities support services compare to industry benchmarks or similar GSA contracts?

Determining the precise per-unit cost for these facilities support services requires a detailed breakdown of the services provided (e.g., janitorial, HVAC maintenance, groundskeeping) and the metrics used for pricing (e.g., per square foot, per hour, per service type). The current award of $1.98 million for a one-year period under a firm-fixed-price BPA Call suggests a comprehensive service package. To benchmark effectively, one would need to compare this against GSA's established pricing guidelines for facilities support or data from similar contracts awarded in the region or nationally. For example, if the contract covers 500,000 square feet, the cost per square foot could be calculated and compared. Industry benchmarks for commercial building maintenance vary widely based on service scope, building type, and location. Without specific service details and GSA's internal benchmarks, a definitive comparison is challenging, but the 'full and open competition' award mechanism implies that the pricing was vetted against market conditions.

What is DAE SUNG LLC's track record with GSA and other federal agencies for similar facilities support contracts?

DAE SUNG LLC's track record with GSA and other federal agencies is a key indicator of their reliability and performance capabilities for this facilities support services contract. As this is an option year for an existing BPA Call, it suggests that the agency has had prior experience with DAE SUNG LLC and found their performance satisfactory enough to continue the contract. Further investigation would involve reviewing past performance evaluations, any documented disputes or contract modifications, and the company's history with other federal solicitations. A positive performance history typically involves meeting or exceeding service level agreements, timely issue resolution, and adherence to contract terms. Conversely, a history of performance issues, contract disputes, or significant modifications could raise concerns about the contractor's ability to consistently deliver the required services effectively and efficiently.

What specific facilities support services are included under this BPA Call, and how has the scope evolved since the initial award?

The scope of services under this Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call is critical to understanding the value and performance expectations. 'Facilities Support Services' is a broad category that can encompass a wide range of activities, including but not limited to, janitorial services, pest control, landscaping, minor repairs, HVAC maintenance, electrical services, plumbing, and security system monitoring. For this specific contract (47PF5225F0001), understanding the precise list of services covered is essential for evaluating the $1.98 million award. If this is Option Year 3, it's important to know if the scope has remained consistent since the initial award or if it has been expanded or reduced through modifications. Changes in scope could justify variations in cost from previous years. Without the detailed Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS), a precise assessment of the services rendered and their associated value is limited.

What are the potential risks associated with relying on a single contractor for facilities support services in Vermont, especially given the firm-fixed-price structure?

Relying on a single contractor, DAE SUNG LLC, for facilities support services in Vermont presents several potential risks, even with a firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract. Firstly, there's the risk of contractor default or performance failure; if DAE SUNG LLC experiences financial difficulties, operational issues, or fails to meet performance standards, it could disrupt essential government operations. Secondly, the FFP structure, while providing cost certainty, can limit flexibility. If unforeseen circumstances require additional services beyond the original scope, obtaining them might necessitate a new procurement or a costly contract modification, potentially negating the initial cost benefits. Thirdly, a lack of ongoing competition during the contract period could reduce the incentive for the contractor to innovate or proactively improve services, as they are guaranteed payment regardless of enhanced performance beyond the minimum requirements. Finally, the geographic concentration in Vermont could pose logistical challenges if the contractor faces localized issues like natural disasters or labor shortages.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: EQ1PS-25-0445

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 23808 W ANDREW RD, PLAINFIELD, IL, 60585

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Government, Native American Tribal Government, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,447,079

Exercised Options: $1,975,812

Current Obligation: $1,975,812

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PB0022A0006

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline