GSA awards $89K contract for Aberdeen Federal Building door replacement, highlighting facilities modernization needs

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $89,122 ($89.1K)

Contractor: DAE Sung LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-08

End Date: 2026-08-21

Contract Duration: 135 days

Daily Burn Rate: $660/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: THIS PROJECT IS TO REMOVE AND REPLACE FOUR (4) EXISTING STOREFRONT DOORS AND ASSOCIATED HARDWARE TO IMPROVE FUNCTIONALITY AND SECURITY AT THE LOCATED AT THE ABERDEEN FEDERAL BUILDING 115 4TH AVENUE SE ABERDEEN, SD 57401.

Place of Performance

Location: ABERDEEN, BROWN County, SOUTH DAKOTA, 57401

State: South Dakota Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $89,122.2 to DAE SUNG LLC for work described as: THIS PROJECT IS TO REMOVE AND REPLACE FOUR (4) EXISTING STOREFRONT DOORS AND ASSOCIATED HARDWARE TO IMPROVE FUNCTIONALITY AND SECURITY AT THE LOCATED AT THE ABERDEEN FEDERAL BUILDING 115 4TH AVENUE SE ABERDEEN, SD 57401. Key points: 1. The contract focuses on essential infrastructure upgrades, improving functionality and security. 2. Competition dynamics for this type of facility maintenance are crucial for cost-effectiveness. 3. Performance hinges on timely completion and quality of the door installation. 4. This project aligns with broader federal efforts to maintain and modernize government buildings. 5. The General Services Administration (GSA) oversees a vast portfolio of federal properties.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $89,122.20 for replacing four storefront doors and hardware appears reasonable given the scope of work. Benchmarking against similar facility maintenance contracts for federal buildings suggests that pricing for such upgrades can vary significantly based on location, building complexity, and specific hardware requirements. Without detailed cost breakdowns, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the award amount does not immediately raise red flags for a project of this nature.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method is generally preferred as it fosters a competitive environment, potentially leading to better pricing and service quality. The specific number of bidders was not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust bidding process was available.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition through potentially lower prices and a wider selection of qualified contractors, ensuring efficient use of federal funds.

Public Impact

Federal employees and visitors at the Aberdeen Federal Building will benefit from improved functionality and security. The services delivered include the removal and replacement of four storefront doors and associated hardware. The geographic impact is localized to Aberdeen, South Dakota. The project supports the facilities maintenance workforce, potentially involving local contractors or tradespeople.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, which encompasses a broad range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of government buildings. The market for these services is substantial, driven by the continuous need to preserve and upgrade federal infrastructure across the country. This specific project, involving door replacement, is a common requirement within this sector, contributing to the overall upkeep of federal properties managed by agencies like the GSA.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. This suggests that the primary award went to a larger entity or that small businesses did not participate significantly in the bidding process for this specific contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine the overall impact on the small business ecosystem for facilities maintenance in the region.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) typically has robust oversight mechanisms for its contracts, including performance monitoring and quality assurance. As a firm fixed-price contract, the financial oversight focuses on ensuring the work is completed according to specifications. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, and the GSA's Office of Inspector General would have jurisdiction over any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

facilities-support-services, general-services-administration, aberdeen, south-dakota, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, bpa-call, infrastructure-upgrade, building-maintenance, security-enhancement

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $89,122.2 to DAE SUNG LLC. THIS PROJECT IS TO REMOVE AND REPLACE FOUR (4) EXISTING STOREFRONT DOORS AND ASSOCIATED HARDWARE TO IMPROVE FUNCTIONALITY AND SECURITY AT THE LOCATED AT THE ABERDEEN FEDERAL BUILDING 115 4TH AVENUE SE ABERDEEN, SD 57401.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DAE SUNG LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $89,122.2.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-08. End: 2026-08-21.

What is the track record of DAE SUNG LLC in performing similar federal contracts?

A review of federal contract databases indicates that DAE SUNG LLC has been awarded multiple contracts, primarily in the facilities maintenance and repair domain. While specific details on past performance for door replacement projects are not immediately available in the abbreviated data, their presence in federal contracting suggests some level of experience. Further investigation into their past performance reviews and contract completion history would be necessary to fully assess their reliability and expertise for this specific task. Analyzing the value and complexity of their previous awards could provide additional context on their capabilities.

How does the cost of this door replacement compare to similar projects in the region or for the GSA?

The provided data does not include a per-unit cost for the doors or hardware, making a direct comparison difficult. However, the total contract value of $89,122.20 for four doors suggests an average cost of approximately $22,280 per door. This figure needs to be contextualized by the specific type of doors (e.g., security-rated, specialized materials), the complexity of installation, and the associated hardware. Benchmarking against publicly available data for commercial or government door replacement projects in South Dakota or similar federal buildings would be required for a more precise value assessment. Factors like labor costs, material prices, and any unforeseen site conditions can significantly influence the final price.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks for this contract include potential delays due to unforeseen site conditions during demolition, issues with material procurement or delivery, and the possibility of the installed doors not meeting security or functionality specifications. Mitigation strategies likely involve thorough site assessments prior to work commencement, clear communication channels with the contractor, and robust quality assurance checks during and after installation. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract also incentivizes the contractor to manage risks effectively to avoid cost overruns. The GSA's oversight role is critical in ensuring these risks are managed proactively.

What is the expected impact of these new doors on the functionality and security of the Aberdeen Federal Building?

The replacement of four existing storefront doors and associated hardware is expected to significantly improve both the functionality and security of the Aberdeen Federal Building. Functionality improvements could include smoother operation, better insulation, and enhanced accessibility. Security enhancements are a primary driver, likely involving more robust locking mechanisms, stronger door materials, and better resistance to unauthorized entry. These upgrades contribute to a safer working environment for federal employees and a more secure facility for government operations and public access.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities maintenance and repair at the Aberdeen Federal Building?

The provided data does not contain historical spending information for the Aberdeen Federal Building. To analyze historical spending patterns, one would need to access GSA's procurement records or facility management budgets over several fiscal years. Such an analysis would reveal trends in maintenance costs, identify recurring issues, and help assess whether this $89,122.20 contract represents a typical expenditure for door replacements or a deviation from past spending. Understanding historical context is crucial for evaluating the long-term cost-effectiveness of facility upkeep.

How does the BPA Call award mechanism influence the competition and pricing for this contract?

A Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call is a method of ordering goods or services against an existing BPA. BPAs are established with vendors to streamline future procurements for specific items or services. When a BPA Call is issued, it means the competition might have occurred at the BPA establishment level, or there could be further competition among BPA holders depending on the BPA's terms. If this was a competitive BPA Call among multiple vendors holding the same BPA, it could still foster price competition. However, if it was a single-award BPA and this is a call against it, the competition occurred earlier. The firm fixed-price nature of the award provides cost certainty regardless of the BPA Call specifics.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesFacilities Support ServicesFacilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 23808 W ANDREW RD, PLAINFIELD, IL, 60585

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Government, Native American Tribal Government, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $89,122

Exercised Options: $89,122

Current Obligation: $89,122

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PJ0023A0001

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-04-08

Current End Date: 2026-08-21

Potential End Date: 2026-10-20 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-08

More Contracts from DAE Sung LLC

View all DAE Sung LLC federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending