Cooling tower valve replacement contract awarded to TeamGov, Inc. for $14,300

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,300 ($14.3K)

Contractor: Teamgov, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-06

End Date: 2026-06-05

Contract Duration: 60 days

Daily Burn Rate: $238/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: REPLACE 3 COOLING TOWER VALVES AT BRT USCH IN RENO, NV.

Place of Performance

Location: RENO, WASHOE County, NEVADA, 89501

State: Nevada Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $14,299.72 to TEAMGOV, INC. for work described as: REPLACE 3 COOLING TOWER VALVES AT BRT USCH IN RENO, NV. Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized facility maintenance services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. 4. Short performance period indicates a focused scope of work. 5. Services are essential for maintaining building operational efficiency.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $14,299.72 for replacing three cooling tower valves is modest. Benchmarking against similar facility maintenance contracts for specialized equipment replacement suggests this price is within a reasonable range. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government, indicating good value for money assuming the work is completed to specification.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, this method generally fosters price discovery and encourages competitive pricing. The GSA's use of a BPA Call suggests a pre-competed framework, further streamlining the process.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically results in better pricing for taxpayers by allowing a wider pool of contractors to bid, driving down costs through market forces.

Public Impact

Federal employees and visitors at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USCH) facility in Reno, Nevada, will benefit from improved climate control. The contract ensures the continued operational efficiency of critical building infrastructure. Geographic impact is localized to Reno, Nevada. Workforce implications are minimal, likely involving a small team of specialized technicians.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific bidder count limits assessment of competitive intensity.
No details on contractor's past performance on similar valve replacements.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract reduces financial risk for the government.
Short duration suggests efficient project management and execution.
Awarded by GSA, an agency with established procurement processes.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing maintenance, repair, and operational services for government buildings. The market for such services is competitive, with numerous providers ranging from small businesses to large corporations. This specific procurement addresses a critical but localized need for specialized HVAC component maintenance.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This suggests that the primary awardee, TeamGov, Inc., is likely a larger entity or that the scope of work did not lend itself to small business participation under set-aside provisions.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed budget. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases, though specific performance metrics are not detailed here.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
HVAC System Repair and Maintenance
GSA Public Buildings Service Contracts

Risk Flags

Limited information on bidder competition.
No specific past performance data for contractor on this task.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $14,299.72 to TEAMGOV, INC.. REPLACE 3 COOLING TOWER VALVES AT BRT USCH IN RENO, NV.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TEAMGOV, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14,299.72.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-06. End: 2026-06-05.

What is the track record of TeamGov, Inc. in performing similar cooling tower valve replacement services?

Information regarding TeamGov, Inc.'s specific track record for cooling tower valve replacements is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract history, and client references related to similar projects. Without this data, it is difficult to definitively assess their expertise and reliability for this particular task. However, their selection under a full and open competition by the GSA suggests they met the basic qualifications required for bidding.

How does the cost of this contract compare to similar cooling tower valve replacement projects?

The contract value of $14,299.72 for replacing three cooling tower valves is a relatively small sum in the context of large federal contracts. Benchmarking this cost requires access to a database of comparable projects, considering factors like geographic location, valve size and type, complexity of installation, and labor rates. Given the firm fixed-price nature and the short duration, the price appears reasonable for specialized maintenance. However, a precise comparison would necessitate more detailed project specifications and market data for the Reno, Nevada area.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential delays in delivery or installation, subpar quality of work, or unforeseen complications during the replacement process. These risks are mitigated by the firm fixed-price contract type, which incentivizes the contractor to complete the work within budget and discourages scope creep. The short performance period (60 days) also limits the window for potential issues. Furthermore, the contract is managed by the GSA, an agency with established oversight and quality assurance protocols for facility maintenance.

How effective is the GSA's Public Buildings Service in managing facility maintenance contracts like this one?

The GSA's Public Buildings Service (PBS) is responsible for managing a vast portfolio of federal buildings and is generally considered experienced in overseeing facility maintenance contracts. Their effectiveness is demonstrated through established procurement processes, contract administration guidelines, and performance monitoring mechanisms. For a contract of this size and scope, the PBS likely relies on standard operating procedures and quality control checks to ensure the work meets requirements. While specific performance metrics for this individual contract are not available, the GSA's overall mission is to provide efficient and cost-effective workspace solutions.

What is the historical spending pattern for cooling tower maintenance and repair at the BRT USCH facility?

Historical spending data for cooling tower maintenance and repair specifically at the BRT USCH facility in Reno, NV, is not provided in this dataset. To analyze historical patterns, one would need access to past contracts, work orders, and expenditure records for this specific location and service category. This would allow for an assessment of the frequency of such repairs, average costs over time, and potential trends in equipment failure or maintenance needs. Without this historical context, it's challenging to determine if this $14,300 contract represents a typical expenditure or an anomaly.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: EQPMBE-26-0095

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 8201 CORPORATE DR STE 620, HYATTSVILLE, MD, 20785

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,300

Exercised Options: $14,300

Current Obligation: $14,300

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PK0225A0002

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline