GSA awards $486K for tuckpointing repairs at Young Federal Building in St. Louis

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $48,600 ($48.6K)

Contractor: DAE Sung LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-01

End Date: 2026-05-30

Contract Duration: 59 days

Daily Burn Rate: $824/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: PERFORM 10TH FLOOR TUCKPOINTING REPAIRS YOUNG FEDERAL BUILIDNG ST LOUIS, MO

Place of Performance

Location: SAINT LOUIS, SAINT LOUIS CITY County, MISSOURI, 63103

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $48,600 to DAE SUNG LLC for work described as: PERFORM 10TH FLOOR TUCKPOINTING REPAIRS YOUNG FEDERAL BUILIDNG ST LOUIS, MO Key points: 1. The contract value appears reasonable for specialized building maintenance services. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration is relatively short, indicating a focused scope of work. 4. Performance is scheduled to conclude in Spring 2026. 5. The award was made to DAE SUNG LLC, a new entrant in federal contracting for this specific service. 6. The work falls under facilities support services, a common category for federal building upkeep.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $486,000 for tuckpointing repairs over a two-month period seems aligned with the scope of work for a federal building. Benchmarking against similar projects for facade restoration and masonry repair on historic or large federal structures would provide a more precise value assessment. However, given the specialized nature of tuckpointing and the location, the price appears to be within a fair range, assuming quality materials and skilled labor are employed.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the use of this procurement method generally fosters price discovery and encourages competitive pricing. The General Services Administration (GSA) likely sought multiple proposals to ensure the best value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that aims to secure the most cost-effective solution for essential building maintenance, preventing potential overspending on repairs.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the occupants and users of the Young Federal Building in St. Louis, ensuring a safe and well-maintained environment. The services delivered include critical tuckpointing repairs, essential for the structural integrity and aesthetic preservation of the building. The geographic impact is localized to St. Louis, Missouri, specifically affecting the Young Federal Building. Workforce implications include the potential employment of skilled masons and construction laborers for the duration of the contract.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific bidder count limits assessment of competitive intensity.
No historical performance data available for DAE SUNG LLC on federal contracts.
Scope of 'tuckpointing' could be broad; detailed specifications are crucial for cost control.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a fair market approach.
Firm Fixed Price contract type helps control costs and manage budget.
Contract duration is short, allowing for focused oversight and timely completion.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, specifically addressing building maintenance and repair. This sector is a significant component of federal spending, encompassing a wide range of services from janitorial to major structural repairs. The market for such services is generally robust, with numerous providers ranging from small local businesses to large national corporations. The GSA, as a major property manager, frequently awards contracts for building upkeep across its portfolio.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor is there an indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This suggests that the primary awardee, DAE SUNG LLC, is either a large business or that the specific nature of the work did not lend itself to small business set-aside considerations. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the General Services Administration's Public Buildings Service, which is responsible for the maintenance and operation of federal buildings. Accountability measures are typically embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and payment schedules tied to satisfactory completion. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics may not always be publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
Historic Preservation Projects
Facilities Management Services
Masonry Repair Contracts

Risk Flags

Limited contractor performance history in federal sector.
Potential for scope creep if 'tuckpointing' definition is not precise.
Dependence on local labor market for skilled masons.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $48,600 to DAE SUNG LLC. PERFORM 10TH FLOOR TUCKPOINTING REPAIRS YOUNG FEDERAL BUILIDNG ST LOUIS, MO

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DAE SUNG LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $48,600.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2026-05-30.

What is the track record of DAE SUNG LLC in performing federal contracts, particularly for facilities maintenance?

As of the data provided, DAE SUNG LLC appears to be a relatively new entity in the federal contracting space for facilities maintenance, specifically for tuckpointing. A review of federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) would be necessary to ascertain their full contract history. Without prior federal performance data, assessing their track record relies heavily on the terms of this specific contract, the competitive bidding process, and potentially past performance information from non-federal projects if available and considered by the GSA during the award decision. The limited duration and specific nature of this contract may serve as an initial performance indicator.

How does the awarded value of $486,000 compare to similar tuckpointing projects on federal buildings?

Benchmarking this $486,000 contract requires comparing it against similar tuckpointing or masonry repair projects on federal buildings of comparable size, age, and complexity. Factors such as square footage of facade, type of brick and mortar, accessibility, and prevailing labor rates in St. Louis would influence cost. Given the two-month duration, this suggests a focused scope rather than a comprehensive building envelope restoration. Without specific details on the extent of work and comparable project data, it's challenging to definitively state if the value is high or low. However, for specialized facade repair on a federal building, this figure appears within a plausible range, assuming it covers necessary materials and skilled labor for the defined scope.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Key risks include potential delays in project completion, cost overruns if the scope is underestimated, or subpar quality of work. Mitigation strategies likely involve the Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type, which shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor. The GSA's oversight, including site inspections and adherence to specifications, addresses quality concerns. The relatively short duration (59 days) also helps mitigate risks by limiting the window for issues to arise and allowing for quicker resolution. Contractor performance evaluations post-completion will also inform future contracting decisions.

How effective is the 'full and open competition' approach in ensuring value for this specific tuckpointing service?

Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring value, as it allows the widest possible pool of qualified contractors to bid, fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages innovation. For a service like tuckpointing, where multiple firms may possess the necessary skills, this approach maximizes the chances of the GSA receiving competitive bids. The effectiveness is contingent on the clarity of the solicitation documents and the rigor of the evaluation process. If the competition yields multiple strong bids, it strongly suggests that the awarded price reflects fair market value.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities maintenance at the Young Federal Building or similar GSA-managed properties?

Analyzing historical spending for facilities maintenance at the Young Federal Building or similar GSA-managed properties would provide context for this $486,000 award. GSA's portfolio includes numerous buildings, and spending on maintenance varies significantly based on building age, condition, size, and specific repair needs. Without access to GSA's historical spending data for this specific building or a comparable cohort, it's difficult to establish a pattern. However, federal buildings, especially older ones, typically require ongoing investment in structural upkeep, including masonry work, making such contracts a recurring necessity.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47PD5326Q0040

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 23808 W ANDREW RD, PLAINFIELD, IL, 60585

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Government, Native American Tribal Government, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $48,600

Exercised Options: $48,600

Current Obligation: $48,600

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PG0122A0006

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline