GSA awards $179,610 contract for sprinkler head replacement in New York

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $179,611 ($179.6K)

Contractor: Corporate Source, Inc the

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-02

End Date: 2027-01-10

Contract Duration: 283 days

Daily Burn Rate: $635/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: REPLACE NON CONFORMING SPRINKLER HEADS, GSA ENG 1977

Place of Performance

Location: NEW YORK, NEW YORK County, NEW YORK, 10278

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $179,610.69 to CORPORATE SOURCE, INC THE for work described as: REPLACE NON CONFORMING SPRINKLER HEADS, GSA ENG 1977 Key points: 1. Contract focuses on essential facility maintenance, ensuring safety and compliance. 2. Limited competition may impact price efficiency. 3. Contract duration of 283 days suggests a focused scope of work. 4. Performance is situated within the Facilities Support Services sector. 5. Geographic focus on New York (NY) indicates localized service delivery.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $179,610 for replacing sprinkler heads appears reasonable for a localized facility maintenance task. Without specific details on the number of units or complexity, direct comparison is difficult. However, for a project of this nature, the cost seems within a typical range for specialized repair services. Further benchmarking against similar GSA projects or private sector contracts for sprinkler system maintenance would provide a clearer picture of value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. This approach is typically used when a specific contractor possesses unique capabilities, or for urgent requirements where competition is not feasible. The lack of competition means that the government did not benefit from potential price reductions or innovative solutions that could arise from a bidding process.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can potentially lead to higher costs for taxpayers as competitive pressures are absent, and the government may not secure the best possible pricing.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the occupants and users of the federal facility in New York where the sprinkler heads are located. The service delivered is the replacement of non-conforming sprinkler heads, crucial for fire suppression system functionality. The geographic impact is limited to the specific federal building or facility in New York. Workforce implications are minimal, likely involving a small team of specialized technicians from the awarded contractor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source award limits opportunities for other qualified businesses.
Lack of competition may result in a less than optimal price for taxpayers.

Positive Signals

Addresses a critical safety requirement for fire suppression.
Clear end date for the contract ensures defined project timeline.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing maintenance, repair, and operational services for buildings and infrastructure. The market for these services is substantial, with numerous providers ranging from small specialized firms to large facility management corporations. This specific contract addresses a niche requirement within the larger sector, focusing on critical life safety systems. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found in contracts for building maintenance, HVAC repair, and electrical services.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not awarded to a small business, nor does it appear to have specific small business set-aside provisions. There is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses within the provided data. This means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract are limited, and the potential positive impact on the small business ecosystem for this particular award is negligible.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service. Accountability measures would be tied to the terms and conditions of the firm-fixed-price delivery order, ensuring the work is completed satisfactorily and within the specified timeframe. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award, but contract details should be available through federal procurement databases.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
Fire Suppression System Upgrades
GSA Facilities Management
Public Buildings Service Contracts

Risk Flags

Sole-source award may limit price competition.
Lack of detailed scope may obscure true value for money.
Potential for future non-conformance if root cause not addressed.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $179,610.69 to CORPORATE SOURCE, INC THE. REPLACE NON CONFORMING SPRINKLER HEADS, GSA ENG 1977

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CORPORATE SOURCE, INC THE.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $179,610.69.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-02. End: 2027-01-10.

What is the specific reason for the non-conformance of the sprinkler heads?

The provided data indicates the need to 'REPLACE NON CONFORMING SPRINKLER HEADS' but does not specify the exact nature of the non-conformance. This could be due to several reasons, including age, wear and tear, failure to meet current safety codes or standards, or a manufacturing defect. A detailed inspection report or maintenance log would typically document the specific issues leading to the replacement requirement. Understanding the cause of non-conformance is crucial for preventing future occurrences and ensuring the long-term reliability of the fire suppression system.

How does the $179,610 cost compare to similar sprinkler head replacement projects?

Benchmarking this contract's value requires more granular data on the scope of work, such as the number of sprinkler heads replaced, the type of facility, and the complexity of the installation. However, for a project focused on replacing sprinkler heads, $179,610 appears to be a moderate investment. Similar projects in the private sector or other government agencies can vary widely. For instance, replacing a few dozen heads in a small office might cost tens of thousands, while a full system overhaul in a large complex could run into hundreds of thousands. Without specific details on the quantity and labor involved, a precise comparison is challenging, but the cost seems aligned with a focused repair effort rather than a large-scale system upgrade.

What are the risks associated with a sole-source award for this type of service?

The primary risk associated with a sole-source award for sprinkler head replacement is the potential for inflated pricing due to the absence of competitive bidding. The contractor may not feel the same pressure to offer the most cost-effective solution as they would in a competitive environment. Additionally, there's a risk that the government might not be exposed to potentially more innovative or efficient methods or technologies that other vendors could offer. While sole-source awards are justified in certain circumstances (e.g., unique capabilities, urgent need), they necessitate careful justification and price negotiation to mitigate these risks and ensure fair value is obtained.

What is the expected impact on facility safety and compliance?

Replacing non-conforming sprinkler heads is critical for maintaining the integrity and effectiveness of the building's fire suppression system. Non-conforming heads could fail to activate properly during a fire, leading to increased damage, potential injury, or loss of life. By addressing this issue, the contract directly enhances the safety of the facility's occupants and visitors. It also ensures compliance with relevant building codes and fire safety regulations, preventing potential violations and associated penalties. The timely completion of this work is therefore essential for risk mitigation and regulatory adherence.

What is the historical spending pattern for sprinkler system maintenance at this GSA facility?

The provided data does not include historical spending patterns for sprinkler system maintenance at this specific GSA facility. To assess historical spending, one would need to access GSA's procurement records or facility management reports over previous fiscal years. Analyzing past expenditures on similar maintenance tasks would help determine if the current contract value is consistent with previous investments, or if there has been a significant increase or decrease. This historical context is vital for evaluating the long-term cost-effectiveness and identifying any trends in maintenance needs or spending.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: EQPMAG-26-0228

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1225 FRANKLIN AVE STE 335, GARDEN CITY, NY, 11530

Business Categories: AbilityOne Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $179,611

Exercised Options: $179,611

Current Obligation: $179,611

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PC0724D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline