GSA awards $837K for elevator maintenance at Moakley Courthouse, utilizing a BPA call

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,374 ($8.4K)

Contractor: Kcorp Technology Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-07

End Date: 2027-03-11

Contract Duration: 338 days

Daily Burn Rate: $25/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PURCHASE OF A NEW KONE ELEVATOR TOOL TO SERVICE ELEVATOR PROBLEMS AT THE MOAKLEY FEDERAL COURTHOUSE IN BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS.

Place of Performance

Location: BOSTON, SUFFOLK County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02210

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $8,374 to KCORP TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC. for work described as: PURCHASE OF A NEW KONE ELEVATOR TOOL TO SERVICE ELEVATOR PROBLEMS AT THE MOAKLEY FEDERAL COURTHOUSE IN BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS. Key points: 1. The contract focuses on specialized elevator tool acquisition for a specific federal facility. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration is over a year, indicating a need for sustained service. 4. The fixed-price nature of the contract helps in budget predictability. 5. The service falls under facilities support, a critical but often overlooked area of government operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $837,400 for an elevator tool appears reasonable for specialized equipment and associated services. Benchmarking against similar procurements for facility maintenance equipment is challenging without more specific details on the tool's capabilities and the scope of services. However, the General Services Administration (GSA) typically aims for cost-effectiveness in its procurements, and the use of a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) call suggests a pre-negotiated pricing structure that may offer some value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competitive environment. This approach is generally favored as it allows for the widest possible pool of potential contractors, theoretically leading to better pricing and service options.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of securing the best possible price and quality for the required services, preventing potential overspending associated with less competitive methods.

Public Impact

Federal employees and visitors at the Moakley Federal Courthouse in Boston, Massachusetts, will benefit from reliable elevator functionality. The contract ensures the availability of a specialized tool for servicing elevator problems, maintaining operational continuity. The geographic impact is localized to the Moakley Federal Courthouse in Boston, MA. The contract supports specialized technical services related to facilities maintenance.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in if the specialized tool is proprietary and requires specific maintenance expertise.
Reliance on a single tool may pose a risk if it experiences significant downtime or becomes obsolete.
The specific nature of the tool might limit its applicability to other GSA facilities, reducing potential for broader cost savings.

Positive Signals

The use of a BPA call indicates that pricing and terms were likely pre-negotiated, potentially offering efficiencies.
Full and open competition suggests a deliberate effort to find the most cost-effective solution.
The fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, which encompasses a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of government buildings. The market for specialized maintenance equipment and services is competitive, with numerous providers offering solutions for building systems like elevators. The GSA, as a major procurer of federal real estate and services, frequently engages in contracts for facility upkeep, often leveraging existing agreements like BPAs to streamline procurements for common needs.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a set-aside provision. The prime contractor, KCORP TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC., is likely a larger entity, and opportunities for small businesses would typically arise through their subcontracting efforts, which are not detailed in this data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service, which manages federal facilities. The use of a BPA call suggests that the terms and pricing have undergone some level of review. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, requiring the contractor to deliver the specified tool and services within the agreed budget. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, though detailed performance metrics may not be publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Federal Courthouse Maintenance
Elevator Maintenance Services
Facilities Support Services
General Services Administration Procurement
Blanket Purchase Agreements

Risk Flags

Potential for single-source reliance on specialized equipment.
Limited scope of service tied to a specific facility.
Dependence on contractor's ability to maintain and operate specialized tool.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $8,374 to KCORP TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC.. PURCHASE OF A NEW KONE ELEVATOR TOOL TO SERVICE ELEVATOR PROBLEMS AT THE MOAKLEY FEDERAL COURTHOUSE IN BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KCORP TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8,374.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-07. End: 2027-03-11.

What is the specific type of KONE elevator tool being purchased and what are its key functionalities?

The provided data does not specify the exact model or functionalities of the KONE elevator tool. It is described broadly as a 'tool to service elevator problems.' KONE is a major manufacturer of elevators and escalators, and they offer a range of diagnostic and maintenance equipment. This could include specialized diagnostic software, hardware testing devices, or specific repair tools designed for their elevator systems. Without further details, it's difficult to assess the tool's uniqueness or necessity beyond general elevator maintenance requirements. The contract's focus on a specific tool suggests it might be proprietary or designed for particular troubleshooting needs at the Moakley Federal Courthouse.

How does the $837,400 cost compare to similar elevator maintenance tool procurements by the GSA or other federal agencies?

Benchmarking the $837,400 cost for this specific KONE elevator tool is challenging without more granular data on the tool's specifications, included services, and the contract's duration. Federal procurements for specialized maintenance equipment can vary significantly based on technological sophistication, brand, and bundled support. However, the General Services Administration (GSA) often leverages Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs) to secure favorable pricing through pre-negotiated terms. If this BPA call represents a standard or widely used tool, the price might be within a typical range. Conversely, if it's a highly specialized or proprietary piece of equipment, the cost could be justified by its unique capabilities. A comprehensive comparison would require access to a database of similar GSA or agency procurements for specialized elevator diagnostic and repair equipment.

What is KCORP TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC.'s track record with GSA and similar federal contracts, particularly in facilities support?

Information regarding KCORP TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC.'s specific track record with the GSA and other federal agencies, especially in facilities support and elevator maintenance, is not detailed in the provided data. To assess their performance history, one would typically examine past contract awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any history of disputes or contract terminations. A thorough review would involve searching federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS for previous contracts awarded to KCORP TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC., noting the agencies involved, the services rendered, contract values, and performance outcomes. This would help determine their experience level and reliability in fulfilling similar requirements.

What are the potential risks associated with relying on a single, specialized tool for elevator maintenance at a federal courthouse?

Relying on a single, specialized tool for elevator maintenance at a federal courthouse presents several potential risks. Firstly, if the tool malfunctions or requires maintenance itself, it could lead to significant downtime for elevator repairs, impacting the functionality of the courthouse and potentially disrupting operations. Secondly, if the tool is proprietary to KONE elevators, it might limit the ability to service elevators from other manufacturers or to perform certain repairs without manufacturer-specific support, potentially increasing costs or repair times. Thirdly, technological obsolescence is a risk; if newer, more efficient tools become available, the current investment might quickly become outdated. Finally, the availability of trained personnel to operate and maintain this specific tool is crucial; a shortage of skilled technicians could further exacerbate any operational disruptions.

How does the use of a BPA call for this procurement impact cost-effectiveness and administrative burden compared to a traditional solicitation?

Utilizing a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) call for this procurement generally enhances cost-effectiveness and reduces administrative burden compared to a traditional, full solicitation process. BPAs are established with vendors for commonly purchased items or services, allowing for pre-negotiated pricing, terms, and conditions. When a specific need arises, like the purchase of the KONE elevator tool, a BPA call can be issued, streamlining the ordering process. This avoids the time and resources required for drafting a new solicitation, evaluating numerous proposals, and negotiating terms from scratch. For taxpayers, this often translates to better pricing due to volume commitments and established relationships. Administratively, it simplifies procurement for the agency, freeing up resources for more complex acquisitions.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: ASR 190

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: K'oyitl'ots'ina, Limited

Address: 1603 COLLEGE RD, FAIRBANKS, AK, 99709

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,374

Exercised Options: $8,374

Current Obligation: $8,374

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PB0022A0002

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline