VA awards $375K for mobile surgical unit training to Forts Logistics, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $37,500 ($37.5K)

Contractor: Forts Logistics, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

Start Date: 2026-04-15

End Date: 2026-07-14

Contract Duration: 90 days

Daily Burn Rate: $417/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: MOBILE MEDICAL SURGICAL UNIT (MSU) TRAINING

Place of Performance

Location: GRAND JUNCTION, MESA County, COLORADO, 81501

State: Colorado Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $37,500 to FORTS LOGISTICS, LLC for work described as: MOBILE MEDICAL SURGICAL UNIT (MSU) TRAINING Key points: 1. The contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, raising questions about potential cost savings through competition. 2. The duration of the training is 90 days, suggesting a focused and potentially intensive program. 3. The award amount of $375,000 appears to be a significant investment for a training-specific contract. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210 indicates facilities support services, which aligns with the training of a mobile medical unit. 5. The contract is a firm-fixed-price purchase order, which helps to define the scope and cost upfront. 6. The contract is not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting plans.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

Benchmarking the value for this specific training contract is challenging without more detailed service descriptions and comparable training costs. The $375,000 award for a 90-day training period, while fixed-price, warrants scrutiny to ensure it represents a fair market price for the services rendered. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to definitively assess if this price is optimal.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. This approach limits the opportunity for price discovery and potentially higher costs for the government. The justification for a sole-source award would need to be thoroughly reviewed to understand why full and open competition was not feasible.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can lead to higher costs for taxpayers as the government does not benefit from the price reductions typically achieved through competitive bidding processes.

Public Impact

Veterans will benefit from enhanced medical services delivered by personnel trained on mobile surgical units. The training will equip medical staff with the necessary skills to operate and maintain advanced mobile surgical equipment. The geographic impact is likely focused on facilities within the Department of Veterans Affairs network where these units will be deployed. The workforce implications include upskilling of medical personnel, potentially improving retention and operational readiness.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition may result in a higher price than if the contract were competed.
The specific deliverables and success metrics for the training are not detailed, posing a risk to program effectiveness.
The sole-source justification needs to be robust to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently.

Positive Signals

The firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
The training directly supports the VA's mission to provide advanced medical care to veterans.
The contract has a defined period of performance, ensuring timely delivery of training.

Sector Analysis

The healthcare sector, particularly within government agencies like the VA, often procures specialized training and support services. The market for mobile medical units and their associated training is a niche but growing area, driven by the need for flexible and accessible healthcare delivery. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve other government contracts for similar mobile medical unit operations or specialized medical equipment training.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor is there any indication of subcontracting requirements. This means that opportunities for small business participation in this specific award are limited. The focus appears to be on securing specialized training from a particular vendor, rather than fostering small business engagement.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely fall under the Department of Veterans Affairs' contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be tied to the successful completion of the training program as defined in the contract's statement of work. Transparency regarding the sole-source justification and the specific training outcomes will be key to assessing accountability.

Related Government Programs

Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Equipment Procurement
Mobile Healthcare Services
Medical Training and Simulation
Facilities Support Services

Risk Flags

Sole-source award lacks competitive pricing.
Lack of detailed performance metrics hinders effectiveness assessment.
Contractor's past performance is not readily available.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $37,500 to FORTS LOGISTICS, LLC. MOBILE MEDICAL SURGICAL UNIT (MSU) TRAINING

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FORTS LOGISTICS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $37,500.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-15. End: 2026-07-14.

What is the specific training curriculum and the qualifications of the instructors provided by Forts Logistics, LLC?

The provided data does not detail the specific training curriculum or the qualifications of the instructors. A comprehensive review would require access to the contract's statement of work (SOW) and any associated appendices. Typically, for a mobile medical surgical unit (MSU) training, the curriculum would cover the operation, maintenance, and clinical protocols associated with the MSU. Instructor qualifications would likely include extensive experience in both medical procedures and the specific technologies employed in the MSU. The VA's contracting officer and program managers would be responsible for ensuring these elements meet the required standards before and during the contract performance.

How does the $375,000 award for 90 days of training compare to market rates for similar services?

Benchmarking this $375,000 award for a 90-day training period against market rates for similar services is challenging without more specific details on the training scope and deliverables. However, if we consider a rough daily rate, it comes to approximately $4,167 per day. This figure needs to be evaluated against the complexity of the training, the number of personnel being trained, and the specialized nature of mobile medical surgical units. Given the sole-source nature of the award, it is difficult to ascertain if this represents a competitive market price. Further analysis would require comparing this to other government or commercial contracts for specialized medical equipment training, factoring in instructor-to-student ratios and the sophistication of the training technology used.

What is the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis to Forts Logistics, LLC?

The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED,' which typically implies a sole-source award. The justification for such an award usually stems from specific circumstances where only one vendor can provide the required goods or services. Common reasons include unique capabilities, proprietary technology, urgent and compelling needs, or a lack of market availability. For this contract, the VA would need to have documented why Forts Logistics, LLC was the only responsible source capable of providing the mobile medical surgical unit training. Without this documentation, it is difficult to assess the validity of the sole-source determination and its impact on cost-effectiveness for the government.

What are the expected outcomes and performance metrics for this training contract?

The provided data does not specify the expected outcomes or performance metrics for this training contract. Typically, a contract of this nature would include a detailed Statement of Work (SOW) outlining specific learning objectives, proficiency standards, and evaluation methods. These metrics are crucial for assessing the effectiveness of the training and ensuring that the $375,000 investment yields the desired results for the Department of Veterans Affairs. Without these defined metrics, it is challenging to objectively measure the success of Forts Logistics, LLC's training program and hold them accountable for performance.

Has Forts Logistics, LLC previously performed similar training services for the Department of Veterans Affairs or other federal agencies?

The provided data does not contain information on Forts Logistics, LLC's past performance history. To assess their track record, one would typically consult the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) for previous contracts awarded to this entity. Understanding their experience with similar mobile medical surgical unit training, their performance on prior VA contracts, and any past performance issues or commendations would provide valuable insight into their capability to successfully execute this current award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5225 JOHNSON RD, COCONUT CREEK, FL, 33073

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $37,500

Exercised Options: $37,500

Current Obligation: $37,500

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline