VA awards $941K contract for radiology room site prep to Wichita Falls Tri-Tech, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $9,417,220 ($9.4M)

Contractor: Wichita Falls Tri-Tech, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

Start Date: 2024-12-29

End Date: 2027-07-03

Contract Duration: 916 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: PROJECT# 549-22-102, SITE PREP ROOM FOR RADIOLOGY

Place of Performance

Location: DALLAS, DALLAS County, TEXAS, 75216

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $9.4 million to WICHITA FALLS TRI-TECH, LLC for work described as: PROJECT# 549-22-102, SITE PREP ROOM FOR RADIOLOGY Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized construction services. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. No immediate risk indicators are apparent from the provided data. 4. This contract supports facility upgrades at a VA medical center. 5. The project falls within the broader construction and facilities maintenance sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $941,722 for site preparation for a radiology room appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized construction services. Benchmarking against similar projects would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure indicates that the contractor assumes the risk for cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government. However, without specific details on the scope of work and market rates for similar renovations in the Wichita Falls area, a definitive value assessment is limited.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that the solicitation was publicly advertised and all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of two bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific project. While two bidders are better than one, a higher number of bids would typically lead to more robust price discovery and potentially lower prices for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition, even with two bidders, provides a baseline assurance that the government sought the best possible price. However, taxpayers may have benefited from even greater savings if more firms had participated in the bidding process.

Public Impact

Veterans in the Wichita Falls, Texas area will benefit from improved medical imaging facilities. The contract will deliver essential site preparation services for a new radiology room. The geographic impact is localized to the Department of Veterans Affairs facility in Wichita Falls, Texas. The contract is expected to create temporary employment opportunities for construction workers.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Positive Signals

Utilized full and open competition, maximizing potential bidder pool.
Firm-fixed-price contract type shifts cost risk to the contractor.
Contract awarded to a single entity, simplifying management.
Project duration is defined, allowing for clear performance expectations.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the construction services sector, specifically focusing on specialized building finishing and renovation. The market for such services is driven by demand for facility upgrades and maintenance across various sectors, including government. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other VA or federal construction projects of similar scope and complexity, particularly those involving medical facilities. The size of this contract is relatively modest within the broader federal construction spending landscape.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a set-aside requirement. The primary contractor, Wichita Falls Tri-Tech, LLC, would need to be assessed to determine its own size status and whether it engages in subcontracting with small businesses as part of its standard business operations, which is not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Veterans Affairs' contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring the contractor to deliver the specified site preparation services by the end date. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected or reported.

Related Government Programs

Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Construction
Federal Radiology Equipment Installation Support
Building Finishing Contractors Federal Contracts
Site Preparation Services Federal Procurement

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition due to specialized nature of work.
Risk of unforeseen site conditions impacting schedule and cost.
Need for stringent quality control to meet healthcare facility standards.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $9.4 million to WICHITA FALLS TRI-TECH, LLC. PROJECT# 549-22-102, SITE PREP ROOM FOR RADIOLOGY

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WICHITA FALLS TRI-TECH, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $9.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-12-29. End: 2027-07-03.

What is the track record of Wichita Falls Tri-Tech, LLC with federal contracts, particularly with the VA?

A review of federal procurement databases would be necessary to fully assess the track record of Wichita Falls Tri-Tech, LLC. Information such as past performance on similar VA contracts, any history of contract disputes or performance issues, and the volume and types of federal contracts previously awarded to the company would be crucial. Without this specific data, it is difficult to gauge their reliability and experience beyond this single award. A positive track record with the VA would increase confidence in their ability to successfully execute this project.

How does the awarded price compare to similar radiology room site preparation projects at other VA facilities?

To compare the awarded price of $941,722, one would need to identify comparable VA projects involving site preparation for radiology rooms. This would involve searching federal contract databases for projects with similar scopes of work, geographic locations (to account for regional cost differences), and award dates. Key metrics for comparison would include cost per square foot, cost of specific components (e.g., lead shielding preparation, electrical upgrades), and overall project duration. A significant deviation from the average cost of similar projects could indicate either exceptional value or potential overpricing.

What are the specific risks associated with this type of construction project for the VA?

Risks associated with site preparation for a radiology room can include unforeseen site conditions (e.g., structural issues, unexpected utility lines), delays in material procurement or delivery, labor shortages, and potential scope creep if requirements change during the project. For radiology rooms specifically, risks related to ensuring proper shielding, ventilation, and compliance with stringent healthcare regulations are paramount. The firm-fixed-price contract mitigates some financial risk for the VA, but schedule delays and quality issues remain potential concerns that require diligent oversight.

How effective is the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method in ensuring competitive pricing for specialized construction?

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method aims to maximize competition by broadly advertising opportunities. However, the 'after exclusion of sources' clause suggests that certain pre-qualified or previously vetted sources might have been considered, or that specific requirements limited the pool. While it's a step towards open competition, the effectiveness in ensuring competitive pricing depends heavily on the actual number of bidders that respond and the specificity of the requirements. If the project's technical demands are highly specialized, the pool of capable bidders might naturally be small, limiting the price competition regardless of the solicitation method.

What is the historical spending pattern for site preparation and radiology room construction within the VA?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for site preparation and radiology room construction within the VA would involve examining contract data over several fiscal years. This would reveal trends in contract values, the number of awards, typical contract durations, and the average cost per project. Understanding these patterns helps in budgeting, identifying potential cost efficiencies, and setting realistic expectations for future projects. It can also highlight any significant increases or decreases in demand or cost for these specific services within the VA system.

What are the performance metrics used to evaluate the success of this contract?

Performance metrics for this contract would likely include adherence to the project schedule (delivery by July 3, 2027), quality of workmanship in preparing the site according to specifications, compliance with all relevant building codes and healthcare facility standards, and adherence to the firm-fixed-price budget. The VA's contracting officer's representative (COR) would be responsible for monitoring progress, conducting inspections, and ensuring all contractual requirements are met. Successful completion would be formally accepted upon final inspection and verification of all deliverables.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Building Finishing Contractors › Other Building Finishing Contractors

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Wichita Falls Tri-Tech LLC

Address: 1205 WISHING TREE LN, KELLER, TX, 76248

Business Categories: Category Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $9,417,220

Exercised Options: $9,417,220

Current Obligation: $9,417,220

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 36C25719D0067

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline