VA awards $210K contract for patient lifts and related equipment to J Lee Management, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $210,831 ($210.8K)

Contractor: J LEE Management, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

Start Date: 2026-04-08

End Date: 2027-04-07

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $579/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: PATIENT LIFTS, LIFT GATES, RAILS, TURNSTILES REQUIREMENT ADD 149 AMICO PATIENT LIFTS/ OPTION YEAR 3

Place of Performance

Location: PITTSBURGH, ALLEGHENY County, PENNSYLVANIA, 15205

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $210,830.75 to J LEE MANAGEMENT, INC. for work described as: PATIENT LIFTS, LIFT GATES, RAILS, TURNSTILES REQUIREMENT ADD 149 AMICO PATIENT LIFTS/ OPTION YEAR 3 Key points: 1. Contract focuses on essential medical equipment for patient mobility and safety. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a potentially competitive bidding process for this requirement. 3. Performance period extends over one year, suggesting ongoing need for these supplies. 4. The contract falls under the 'Other Electronic and Precision Equipment Repair and Maintenance' NAICS code. 5. This award represents a specific need within the broader VA healthcare supply chain. 6. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to control costs for the government.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $210,830.75 for one year of patient lifts and related equipment appears reasonable given the specialized nature of the items. Benchmarking against similar VA or DoD contracts for medical equipment of this type would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the firm-fixed-price contract type suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was competed under SAP (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), suggesting it was likely advertised broadly to eligible vendors. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, competition under SAP generally aims to solicit multiple offers to ensure fair pricing. The use of SAP indicates the acquisition value was likely below the threshold for full and open competition, but still allowed for a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: Competition under SAP helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by encouraging multiple vendors to offer their best pricing, leading to potentially lower costs for the VA.

Public Impact

Veterans will benefit from improved access to essential medical equipment like patient lifts and lift gates. Services delivered include the provision of specialized equipment crucial for patient care and mobility. The geographic impact is primarily within Pennsylvania, where the contractor is located and likely services are delivered. Workforce implications may include support roles for installation, maintenance, and logistics related to the equipment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for supply chain disruptions if the contractor faces operational issues.
Ensuring timely delivery and maintenance of critical patient care equipment is paramount.
Need for ongoing monitoring of equipment performance and user satisfaction.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the VA.
Competition under SAP suggests a potentially efficient acquisition process.
Contract duration allows for consistent availability of necessary equipment.

Sector Analysis

The healthcare equipment sector is characterized by specialized manufacturers and distributors, with significant government procurement activity to support military and veteran healthcare facilities. This contract for patient lifts and related items fits within the broader medical device and equipment supply market, which is driven by technological advancements and the ongoing need for patient care solutions. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within the VA's own historical procurement data for similar medical equipment categories.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate if this contract was specifically set aside for small businesses, nor does it detail subcontracting plans. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation and its impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically reside with the Department of Veterans Affairs contracting officer and program managers. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified goods. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases like SAM.gov, where contract awards are published.

Related Government Programs

VA Medical Equipment Procurement
Patient Mobility Aids
Healthcare Supply Chain Management
Medical Device Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for delivery delays impacting patient care.
Risk of equipment malfunction or failure to meet specifications.
Dependence on a single contractor for essential medical supplies.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $210,830.75 to J LEE MANAGEMENT, INC.. PATIENT LIFTS, LIFT GATES, RAILS, TURNSTILES REQUIREMENT ADD 149 AMICO PATIENT LIFTS/ OPTION YEAR 3

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is J LEE MANAGEMENT, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $210,830.75.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-08. End: 2027-04-07.

What is the track record of J Lee Management, Inc. in fulfilling federal contracts, particularly for medical equipment?

A review of federal procurement databases would be necessary to assess J Lee Management, Inc.'s track record. This would involve examining past contract awards, performance evaluations (if available), and any history of contract disputes or terminations. Understanding their experience with similar medical equipment, delivery timelines, and customer satisfaction is crucial for evaluating their reliability in fulfilling this new VA contract. Without specific historical data, it's difficult to definitively assess their past performance.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar patient lift procurements by the VA or other federal agencies?

To compare pricing, one would need to identify comparable contracts for patient lifts and related equipment awarded by the VA or other federal agencies within a similar timeframe. This would involve analyzing contract values, quantities, specific equipment models, and contract types. Benchmarking the per-unit cost or total contract value against these comparables would reveal whether the $210,830.75 award represents good value for money. Factors like delivery location, installation services, and warranty periods also influence price and should be considered in the comparison.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

Key risks for this contract include potential delays in delivery, equipment malfunction, or the contractor failing to meet specifications. Given it's a firm-fixed-price contract, the primary risk to the government is receiving substandard equipment or experiencing delivery delays that impact patient care. Mitigation strategies typically involve clear contract terms, performance standards, inspection and acceptance procedures, and potentially liquidated damages clauses for late delivery. The VA's oversight and J Lee Management's own quality control processes are also critical mitigation factors.

How effective has the VA been in procuring essential medical equipment through competitive processes like SAP for similar needs?

The effectiveness of SAP (Simplified Acquisition Procedures) in procuring essential medical equipment hinges on several factors, including the clarity of the requirement, the number of responsive bidders, and the overall market conditions. When well-executed, SAP can lead to efficient and cost-effective acquisitions for lower-value procurements. However, if the market for specific equipment is limited or if the solicitation is not widely disseminated, competition might be suboptimal, potentially leading to less favorable pricing. Analyzing historical data on VA procurements under SAP for similar medical items would provide insights into its effectiveness.

What is the historical spending pattern of the VA for patient lifts and related equipment over the past five years?

Analyzing the VA's historical spending on patient lifts and related equipment over the past five years would reveal trends in procurement volume, average contract values, and the primary contractors utilized. This data can help identify fluctuations in demand, potential cost increases or decreases, and the overall reliance on specific types of contracts (e.g., competitive vs. sole-source). Understanding these patterns provides context for the current $210,830.75 award and helps assess whether it aligns with historical expenditure levels or represents a significant deviation.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Other Services (except Public Administration) › Electronic and Precision Equipment Repair and Maintenance › Other Electronic and Precision Equipment Repair and Maintenance

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: J LEE Management Inc.

Address: 4405 STEUBENVILLE PIKE, PITTSBURGH, PA, 15205

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $210,831

Exercised Options: $210,831

Current Obligation: $210,831

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 36C24822D0045

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline