National Gallery of Art Awards $3,000 for Executive Coaching Services to Walter Hogan

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,000 ($3.0K)

Contractor: Walter Hogan

Awarding Agency: National Gallery of Art

Start Date: 2026-04-09

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 174 days

Daily Burn Rate: $17/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: EXECUTIVE COACHING SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20004

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

National Gallery of Art obligated $3,000 to WALTER HOGAN for work described as: EXECUTIVE COACHING SERVICES Key points: 1. Spending is minimal at $3,000, suggesting a targeted need. 2. No competition was utilized, raising questions about potential cost savings. 3. The service falls under Professional and Management Development Training. 4. The contract is a firm fixed price, providing cost certainty.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value is very low, making direct price comparison difficult. However, the lack of competition for even a small contract warrants scrutiny.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was not competed under SAP, indicating a limited competition approach. This method may not yield the best price or value compared to a fully open competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The direct taxpayer impact is negligible due to the small contract value.

Public Impact

Individuals receiving executive coaching may see improved leadership skills. The National Gallery of Art aims to enhance its management capabilities. The procurement process bypassed standard competitive procedures.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition
Sole-source justification not provided

Positive Signals

Firm fixed price contract
Clear service description

Sector Analysis

Executive coaching services fall under professional services, often associated with management and administrative functions. Spending benchmarks vary widely depending on the scope and duration of coaching.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that small businesses were considered or solicited for this contract, which is a missed opportunity for small business engagement.

Oversight & Accountability

The limited competition approach requires clear justification to ensure accountability and prevent potential misuse of funds. Oversight should confirm the necessity and value of the coaching.

Related Government Programs

Professional and Management Development Training
National Gallery of Art Contracting
National Gallery of Art Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of competition
No justification for limited competition
Potential for missed cost savings
No small business consideration

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

National Gallery of Art awarded $3,000 to WALTER HOGAN. EXECUTIVE COACHING SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WALTER HOGAN.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: National Gallery of Art (National Gallery of Art).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3,000.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-09. End: 2026-09-30.

What was the justification for not competing this contract under SAP?

The justification for not competing this contract under SAP is not provided in the data. Typically, agencies must document reasons such as urgency, lack of available sources, or specific expertise required. Without this documentation, it's difficult to assess if limited competition was appropriate or if potential cost savings were forgone.

What is the risk associated with awarding a contract without competition?

The primary risk of awarding a contract without competition is the potential for overpayment and reduced value for money. Without competitive bids, the agency may not secure the most favorable pricing or the best-suited service provider. This can lead to inefficient use of taxpayer funds and potentially lower quality outcomes.

How effective is executive coaching likely to be in this context?

The effectiveness of executive coaching is highly dependent on the coach's qualifications, the coachee's engagement, and the alignment of coaching goals with organizational objectives. Given the small contract value and lack of competition, it's difficult to assess the rigor of the selection process. However, if well-executed, it can lead to improved leadership and performance within the National Gallery of Art.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Educational Services › Business Schools and Computer and Management Training › Professional and Management Development Training

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3441 COURTLAND DR, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 22041

Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Sole Proprietorship, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,000

Exercised Options: $3,000

Current Obligation: $3,000

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline