State Department awards $107,923 purchase order for swimming pool deck repair to FES Service Co., Ltd

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $107,924 ($107.9K)

Contractor: FES Service CO., Ltd.

Awarding Agency: Department of State

Start Date: 2026-04-02

End Date: 2026-06-29

Contract Duration: 88 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.2K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: 7902/XJIE0211/FWP632/CMR SWIMMING POOL DECK REPAIR

Plain-Language Summary

Department of State obligated $107,923.56 to FES SERVICE CO., LTD. for work described as: 7902/XJIE0211/FWP632/CMR SWIMMING POOL DECK REPAIR Key points: 1. The contract was awarded as a purchase order, indicating a relatively low dollar value and potentially simpler acquisition process. 2. The fixed-price nature of the contract shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor. 3. The contract duration of 88 days suggests a focused scope of work for the repair. 4. The absence of a small business set-aside means opportunities for smaller firms were not specifically prioritized. 5. The contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction NAICS code, placing it within a broad construction services category.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $107,923 for swimming pool deck repair appears to be within a reasonable range for this type of specialized construction service. Without specific details on the scope of work, such as the size of the deck, materials required, and the extent of damage, a precise benchmark is difficult. However, for a project of this nature, the price seems proportionate to the expected deliverables. Further analysis would require comparing this to similar pool deck repair contracts awarded by the government or in the private sector for comparable square footage and complexity.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning only one contractor was solicited. This approach is typically used when there is a compelling reason, such as a unique capability, urgent need, or limited availability of other sources. The lack of competition means that the government did not benefit from a range of proposals and pricing options, which could potentially lead to a higher price than if multiple bids were considered. The justification for this sole-source award would need to be thoroughly reviewed to ensure it was appropriate.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can be less cost-effective for taxpayers as they bypass the competitive process that typically drives down prices. This means the government may not have secured the best possible value for the funds expended.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries of this contract are the personnel and visitors who utilize the facilities managed by the Department of State, ensuring safe and functional recreational areas. The service delivered is the repair of a swimming pool deck, addressing potential safety hazards and aesthetic issues. The geographic impact is localized to the specific facility where the swimming pool is located, managed by the Department of State. Workforce implications are minimal, likely involving a small team of construction workers for the duration of the repair project.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition raises concerns about potential overpayment and the absence of innovative solutions.
Sole-source awards require strong justification to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently.
The purchase order format, while efficient for small buys, might lack the detailed performance metrics of larger contract vehicles.

Positive Signals

The fixed-price contract structure transfers cost risk to the contractor.
The defined contract period suggests a clear timeline for project completion.
The award to FES Service Co., Ltd. provides a specific vendor for this necessary repair.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader construction services sector, specifically Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. This sector encompasses a wide range of activities, from new builds to renovations and repairs. The market for such services is generally competitive, with numerous firms capable of performing general construction tasks. However, specialized repairs like swimming pool decks may involve a smaller subset of contractors with specific expertise. The value of this contract is relatively small within the overall federal construction spending landscape, which often involves much larger infrastructure projects.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned in the provided data. This means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract were not formally prioritized. While FES Service Co., Ltd. might utilize small business subcontractors, there is no explicit mandate within this award to do so. The impact on the broader small business ecosystem is therefore limited to the general market competition for construction services.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this purchase order would primarily fall under the Department of State's contracting officers and potentially their Inspector General's office, depending on the dollar value and specific internal policies. As a purchase order, it is likely subject to standard procurement regulations and internal review processes. Transparency is moderate; while the award is publicly reported, the detailed justification for the sole-source award and specific performance metrics are not readily available without further inquiry.

Related Government Programs

Department of State Facilities Management
General Services Administration (GSA) Building Maintenance and Repair Contracts
Federal Building Construction and Renovation Programs

Risk Flags

Sole-source award bypasses competitive bidding.
Lack of detailed scope of work in summary data.
No explicit small business subcontracting requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of State awarded $107,923.56 to FES SERVICE CO., LTD.. 7902/XJIE0211/FWP632/CMR SWIMMING POOL DECK REPAIR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FES SERVICE CO., LTD..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of State (Department of State).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $107,923.56.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-02. End: 2026-06-29.

What is the specific scope of work for the "CMR SWIMMING POOL DECK REPAIR"?

The provided data does not detail the specific scope of work for the "CMR SWIMMING POOL DECK REPAIR." Typically, such a description would encompass tasks like resurfacing, crack repair, waterproofing, and potentially replacement of damaged sections of the pool deck. The "CMR" designation might refer to a specific project identifier or a type of repair method. Without further documentation, the exact nature and extent of the repairs remain unspecified, making it difficult to fully assess the value or necessity of the contract.

What is the track record of FES Service Co., Ltd. with the Department of State or other federal agencies?

The provided data does not include information on the track record of FES Service Co., Ltd. To assess their performance history, one would need to consult federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS-NG to review past contracts awarded to this company, their performance evaluations, and any history of disputes or contract terminations. A positive track record with the Department of State or similar agencies would indicate reliability and competence, while a negative history might raise concerns about future performance and value for money.

Why was this contract awarded on a sole-source basis instead of through full and open competition?

The data indicates this contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning competition was limited to a single contractor. The specific justification for this sole-source award is not provided in the data. Common reasons for sole-sourcing include urgent and compelling needs where only one contractor can meet the requirement, situations where only one contractor possesses unique capabilities or proprietary technology, or when the contract is a follow-on to a previous award where only that contractor can provide the necessary services. A thorough review of the agency's justification documentation is necessary to understand the rationale and ensure it aligns with federal procurement regulations.

How does the $107,923 contract value compare to similar swimming pool deck repair projects?

Benchmarking the $107,923 contract value for swimming pool deck repair requires more specific details about the project's scope, such as the square footage of the deck, the type of materials used, and the extent of the damage. However, for a typical repair project of moderate size, this value appears to be within a plausible range. Without comparative data from similar government or private sector projects, it's challenging to definitively assess if this represents excellent, fair, or questionable value. Further research into construction cost databases or analysis of recently awarded federal contracts for similar services would be needed for a precise comparison.

What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source award for construction services?

The primary risk associated with a sole-source award for construction services is the potential for a lack of price competition, which could lead to the government paying a higher price than if multiple bids were solicited. This can reduce the overall value for taxpayer money. Additionally, without the benefit of competitive proposals, the agency may not be exposed to a wider range of innovative solutions or the most efficient methods for completing the work. There's also a risk that the sole-source contractor may not perform as expected, and the agency has fewer alternatives for recourse compared to a competitive scenario where other qualified contractors are available.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 28/6, VILLAGE NO. 20, LAM LUK KA SUB-DISTRICT, LAM LUK KA DISTRICT

Business Categories: Category Business, Government, U.S. National Government, Not Designated a Small Business, U.S. Regional/State Government

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $107,924

Exercised Options: $107,924

Current Obligation: $107,924

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline