State Department awards $191K facilities support contract to DGI-ATI II LLC in Micronesia

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $191,214 ($191.2K)

Contractor: Dgi-Ati II LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of State

Start Date: 2026-04-15

End Date: 2027-10-15

Contract Duration: 548 days

Daily Burn Rate: $349/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: KOLONIA, MICRONESIA BAS REPLACEMENT

Place of Performance

Location: KOSRAE County, MICRONESIA, 21228

Plain-Language Summary

Department of State obligated $191,214.05 to DGI-ATI II LLC for work described as: KOLONIA, MICRONESIA BAS REPLACEMENT Key points: 1. Contract awarded for facilities support services in Micronesia. 2. Duration of 548 days with a firm fixed price. 3. Competition was open after exclusion of sources, indicating a specific procurement process. 4. The contract value is relatively small, suggesting a focused scope of work. 5. Performance period spans over a year and a half. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 561210 for Facilities Support Services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $191,214.05 is modest for facilities support services. Benchmarking against similar contracts is difficult without more detailed scope of work and location-specific cost data. However, the firm fixed-price structure suggests a defined cost expectation. The value appears reasonable for the stated duration and location, assuming standard service levels.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES.' This suggests that while the competition was intended to be open, certain sources were excluded, possibly due to specific requirements or prior performance issues. The number of bidders is not specified, but the procurement method implies a controlled competitive environment rather than a broad, unrestricted solicitation.

Taxpayer Impact: This procurement method may limit the number of potential offerors, potentially impacting the lowest possible price achievable for taxpayers. However, it could also ensure that only qualified and suitable contractors are considered, mitigating risks associated with unqualified bidders.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the personnel and operations at the U.S. Embassy or facility in Kolonia, Micronesia, who will receive essential facilities support. Services delivered include maintenance, repair, and general upkeep of facilities, ensuring operational readiness and a safe working environment. The geographic impact is localized to Kolonia, Micronesia, supporting U.S. government presence in the region. Workforce implications are likely to involve local hires for some support roles, contributing to the local economy, alongside specialized personnel from the contractor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited competition due to 'exclusion of sources' clause.
Geographic remoteness of Micronesia could impact logistics and cost of services.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical facilities support.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Clear performance period with defined end date.
Awarded by the Department of State, suggesting alignment with diplomatic or governmental operational needs.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services fall under the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. This contract represents a small portion of the government's spending on facility maintenance and operations, which is crucial for maintaining infrastructure at embassies, consulates, and other overseas posts. The market for such services can be competitive, but often involves specialized knowledge of remote or challenging operating environments.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract was set aside for small businesses, nor is there information on subcontracting plans. Given the specific nature and location, it's possible that larger firms with specialized capabilities in overseas support were prioritized. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was encouraged or mandated.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the Department of State's contracting officers and program managers responsible for facilities in the region. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award notice, but detailed performance metrics and oversight reports are typically internal.

Related Government Programs

Overseas Facilities Maintenance
Embassy Operations Support
Government Contracting Services
Facilities Support Services

Risk Flags

Limited competition potential
Geographic remoteness challenges
Potential for supply chain disruptions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of State awarded $191,214.05 to DGI-ATI II LLC. KOLONIA, MICRONESIA BAS REPLACEMENT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DGI-ATI II LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of State (Department of State).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $191,214.05.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-15. End: 2027-10-15.

What specific facilities support services are included in this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'Facilities Support Services' under NAICS code 561210. This typically encompasses a range of services including building maintenance, groundskeeping, custodial services, minor repairs, and potentially security or utility management. However, the exact scope of services, specific deliverables, and performance standards are not detailed in the award notice. A thorough review of the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) would be necessary to understand the precise requirements and ensure alignment with the $191,214.05 budget and the 548-day performance period.

How does the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' procurement method impact cost and competition?

This procurement method suggests that the initial solicitation was intended to be open to all responsible sources, but specific entities were excluded from consideration. The reasons for exclusion could range from past performance issues, inability to meet specific technical requirements, or geographic limitations. While it aims for broad competition, the exclusion clause inherently narrows the field of potential bidders. This could lead to less aggressive pricing compared to a truly unrestricted full and open competition, as the number of viable competitors is reduced. However, it may also ensure that the awarded contractor possesses highly specialized capabilities or has a proven track record relevant to the specific needs, potentially leading to better performance and reduced risk, which can indirectly benefit taxpayers through avoided costs associated with poor execution.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services in Micronesia by the Department of State?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for facilities support in Micronesia requires access to historical contract databases and budget allocations for the Department of State in that specific region. Without this data, it's impossible to provide a precise comparison. However, facilities support is a recurring need for diplomatic missions. Spending can fluctuate based on infrastructure upgrades, new construction, or changes in operational requirements. The current award of $191,214.05 over approximately 1.5 years suggests a consistent, albeit not massive, level of expenditure for maintaining the State Department's presence. Further research into the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or agency budget reports would be needed for a comprehensive historical analysis.

What are the potential risks associated with performing facilities support in a remote location like Micronesia?

Performing facilities support in remote locations like Micronesia presents several unique risks. Logistical challenges are significant, including the cost and time associated with transporting personnel, equipment, and materials. Availability of local skilled labor and specialized repair parts can be limited, potentially leading to delays and increased costs. Furthermore, environmental factors specific to island nations, such as susceptibility to weather events (typhoons, sea-level rise) and unique ecological considerations, may require specialized approaches to maintenance and repair. The contractor must also navigate cultural nuances and potentially different regulatory environments. These factors can increase operational complexity and the likelihood of unforeseen costs or performance issues.

How does the firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type mitigate risk for the government?

A Firm Fixed-Price (FFP) contract is designed to provide the government with cost certainty. Under this type of contract, the contractor agrees to perform a specific scope of work for a predetermined price, regardless of the actual costs incurred. This shifts the risk of cost overruns from the government to the contractor. For the Department of State, this means the $191,214.05 award amount is the ceiling for the services rendered. The contractor is incentivized to manage their costs efficiently to maximize profit. This contract type is generally preferred when the scope of work is well-defined and technical risks are low, as is often the case with routine facilities support services. It simplifies financial management and budgeting for the agency.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5523 RESEARCH PARK DR, CATONSVILLE, MD, 21228

Business Categories: Category Business, Joint Venture Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Joint Venture Women Owned Small Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $191,214

Exercised Options: $191,214

Current Obligation: $191,214

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 19AQMM24D0072

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline