State Department awards $2.3M facilities support task order to Tatitlek Technologies, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,310,144 ($2.3M)

Contractor: Tatitlek Technologies, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of State

Start Date: 2025-03-01

End Date: 2026-08-31

Contract Duration: 548 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.2K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: NEW TASK ORDER FOR CFM SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: STERLING, LOUDOUN County, VIRGINIA, 20166

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of State obligated $2.3 million to TATITLEK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC for work described as: NEW TASK ORDER FOR CFM SERVICES Key points: 1. Value for money assessed against similar facilities support contracts. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a sole-source award, potentially impacting price discovery. 3. Risk indicators include the sole-source nature and firm-fixed-price contract type. 4. Performance context is a facilities support services task order with a 548-day duration. 5. Sector positioning within facilities support services, a common government contracting area.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The $2.3 million task order for CFM services is a firm-fixed-price award. Without comparable contract data or detailed cost breakdowns, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the duration of 548 days suggests a significant scope of work. Benchmarking against similar facilities support contracts awarded by the State Department or other agencies would be necessary to determine if the pricing is competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. This limits the opportunity for price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for the government compared to a fully competed contract. The absence of competition raises questions about whether the government obtained the best possible price and value.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can result in higher costs for taxpayers as there is no competitive pressure to drive down prices. This limits the government's ability to leverage market forces for cost savings.

Public Impact

The Department of State benefits from continued facilities support services. Services include facilities maintenance and management, ensuring operational readiness. Geographic impact is primarily within Virginia, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications include potential employment opportunities for facilities support staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source award limits competitive pricing and value.
Firm-fixed-price contract may not fully account for potential cost efficiencies.
Lack of transparency in the procurement process due to sole-source nature.

Positive Signals

Task order awarded to a specific contractor for essential services.
Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Contract duration of over a year indicates a stable service provision.

Sector Analysis

The facilities support services sector is a mature and essential part of government contracting, encompassing a wide range of services from maintenance and repair to operations and management. This contract falls within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services category. Spending in this area is consistent across many federal agencies to ensure the upkeep and functionality of government facilities.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it indicate any specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless Tatitlek Technologies, LLC voluntarily engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this task order would typically fall under the Department of State's contracting officer and program managers. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award, with details on the justification for not competing the award being crucial for full assessment.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Support Services
Department of State Contracts
Task Orders
Facilities Maintenance and Management

Risk Flags

Sole-source award
Potential for uncompetitive pricing
Limited transparency in procurement

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of State awarded $2.3 million to TATITLEK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. NEW TASK ORDER FOR CFM SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TATITLEK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of State (Department of State).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-03-01. End: 2026-08-31.

What is the track record of Tatitlek Technologies, LLC in performing similar facilities support services for the federal government?

Assessing the track record of Tatitlek Technologies, LLC requires a review of their past performance on federal contracts, particularly those involving facilities support and CFM services. Information on contract history, past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any documented issues or successes would be crucial. A strong performance history on similar contracts would lend confidence to the successful execution of this task order. Conversely, a history of performance issues or contract disputes could indicate a higher risk for this award. Without access to specific past performance data, it is difficult to definitively assess their capabilities for this specific task order.

How does the awarded amount of $2.3 million compare to the market rates for similar facilities support services in Virginia?

To benchmark the $2.3 million award against market rates for similar facilities support services in Virginia, one would need to consult industry pricing data, salary surveys for facilities management personnel, and cost information for materials and equipment. Comparing the estimated cost per day or per square foot of managed space against industry averages would provide insight. Given the firm-fixed-price nature, the government is paying a set amount for the defined scope. If the market rate for comparable services is significantly lower, it suggests this award may not represent optimal value. Conversely, if the rate aligns with or is below market, it could indicate a fair price, though the sole-source nature still warrants scrutiny.

What are the specific risks associated with a sole-source award for facilities support services?

The primary risk associated with a sole-source award for facilities support services is the lack of competitive pressure, which can lead to inflated pricing and reduced incentive for the contractor to innovate or provide exceptional value. Taxpayers may end up paying more than necessary. Another risk is that the government may not be aware of or have access to potentially better solutions or more cost-effective providers available in the market. Furthermore, sole-source justifications can sometimes be weak, raising concerns about fairness and transparency in the procurement process. Without competition, there's also a reduced opportunity to identify and mitigate potential performance risks through a rigorous selection process.

What is the expected effectiveness of these facilities support services in maintaining the operational readiness of Department of State facilities?

The effectiveness of these facilities support services in maintaining operational readiness hinges on the scope of work defined in the task order and the contractor's ability to execute it. Services typically include preventative maintenance, repairs, janitorial services, and potentially groundskeeping, all critical for ensuring facilities are safe, functional, and presentable. The firm-fixed-price structure incentivizes the contractor to deliver these services efficiently. Success will be measured by the contractor's adherence to service level agreements, response times for urgent issues, and the overall condition of the facilities managed. A robust performance monitoring system by the Department of State is essential to ensure effectiveness.

What has been the historical spending pattern for facilities support services by the Department of State over the past five years?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for facilities support services by the Department of State over the past five years would reveal the agency's commitment to this area and the typical scale of such contracts. This data can help contextualize the current $2.3 million task order, indicating whether it represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment. Understanding past spending trends, including the mix of sole-source versus competed awards and the average contract values, can inform future budget planning and procurement strategies. It also helps in identifying any significant shifts in the agency's reliance on external contractors for facilities management.

Are there any specific performance metrics or key performance indicators (KPIs) tied to this task order that will be used to evaluate Tatitlek Technologies, LLC's performance?

The effectiveness and value of this task order are directly linked to the performance metrics and KPIs established within the contract. While not explicitly detailed in the provided data, a well-structured facilities support contract typically includes KPIs related to response times for service requests, completion rates for scheduled maintenance, quality of repairs, adherence to safety standards, and customer satisfaction. The firm-fixed-price nature suggests that meeting these defined metrics is crucial for the contractor to achieve profitability. The Department of State's oversight team would be responsible for monitoring these KPIs and holding Tatitlek Technologies, LLC accountable for performance against them.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: 19AQMM20Q0022

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Tatitlek Corporation

Address: 561 E 36TH AVE, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Government, Native American Tribal Government, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,361,796

Exercised Options: $3,361,796

Current Obligation: $2,310,144

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 19AQMM18D0118

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline