State Department awards $8M facilities maintenance contract to Tatitlek Technologies, LLC for International Chancery Center

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,002,143 ($8.0M)

Contractor: Tatitlek Technologies, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of State

Start Date: 2018-11-01

End Date: 2026-08-31

Contract Duration: 2,860 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.8K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: COMPLETE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR THE US DEPARTMENT OF STATE'S INTERNATIONAL CHANCERY CENTER (SA-33)

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20008

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of State obligated $8.0 million to TATITLEK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC for work described as: COMPLETE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR THE US DEPARTMENT OF STATE'S INTERNATIONAL CHANCERY CENTER (SA-33) Key points: 1. Contract focuses on essential facilities maintenance, ensuring operational continuity for critical diplomatic infrastructure. 2. The award to Tatitlek Technologies, LLC highlights a single-source approach for specialized support services. 3. Performance period extends through August 2026, indicating a long-term need for these services. 4. The contract's firm-fixed-price structure aims to provide cost certainty for the Department of State. 5. Geographic focus is Washington D.C., impacting a key federal hub.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $8 million facilities maintenance contract is challenging without detailed service scope and performance metrics. However, the duration of nearly eight years (from November 2018 to August 2026) suggests a substantial and ongoing requirement. The firm-fixed-price (FFP) structure is generally favorable for cost control, but its effectiveness depends on the initial pricing accuracy and the contractor's ability to manage costs over the extended period. Without comparable contract data for similar facilities maintenance services at other international chancery centers, a precise value-for-money assessment is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. This approach is typically used when a specific contractor possesses unique capabilities, proprietary knowledge, or when urgency and limited availability necessitate a direct award. The lack of competition means that price discovery through market forces was bypassed, potentially leading to higher costs than if multiple bids had been solicited. The justification for this sole-source award would need to be thoroughly documented by the agency to ensure it aligns with federal procurement regulations.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can limit opportunities for other businesses to secure federal contracts and may result in taxpayers paying a premium due to the absence of competitive bidding. This can reduce overall government efficiency and potentially lead to less innovative solutions.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the U.S. Department of State, ensuring the operational readiness and safety of the International Chancery Center. Services include maintenance of building systems, grounds, and general upkeep, contributing to a secure and functional diplomatic environment. The geographic impact is concentrated in Washington D.C., supporting federal operations in the nation's capital. This contract supports a specialized workforce skilled in facilities management and maintenance.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition raises concerns about potential overpricing and reduced value for taxpayer dollars.
Sole-source awards can limit market entry for small businesses and create barriers to future competition.
The extended performance period without re-competition could lead to complacency or reduced incentive for innovation.
Transparency regarding the justification for the sole-source award is crucial for public trust.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the agency and taxpayers.
Long-term contract ensures continuity of essential services for a critical federal facility.
Focus on facilities maintenance supports the secure and efficient operation of diplomatic functions.

Sector Analysis

Facilities support services, categorized under NAICS code 561210, represent a significant segment of the government contracting market. This sector encompasses a wide range of services, from routine maintenance to complex building operations. The Department of State's need for comprehensive maintenance at its International Chancery Center aligns with broader government efforts to maintain aging infrastructure and ensure the security and functionality of federal buildings. Spending in this sector is often driven by the need for specialized expertise and the critical nature of the facilities being supported.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor is there an indication of significant subcontracting opportunities for small businesses. The sole-source nature of the award further limits the direct involvement of small businesses in this specific contract. While Tatitlek Technologies, LLC may engage small businesses in its supply chain, the primary award does not appear to directly foster the small business ecosystem in this instance.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the contracting officer and program managers within the Department of State. The firm-fixed-price structure provides a degree of accountability by linking payment to deliverables. Transparency regarding the justification for the sole-source award and ongoing performance monitoring are key oversight mechanisms. While specific Inspector General (IG) jurisdiction for this particular contract isn't detailed, the Department of State's Office of Inspector General generally oversees agency spending and contract performance for potential fraud, waste, and abuse.

Related Government Programs

General Services Administration (GSA) Facilities Management Contracts
Department of Defense Base Operations Support (BOS)
Federal Building Maintenance Services

Risk Flags

Sole-source award lacks competitive pricing pressure.
Extended contract duration without re-competition may reduce incentive for optimal performance.
Limited public information on specific performance metrics and oversight.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of State awarded $8.0 million to TATITLEK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. COMPLETE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR THE US DEPARTMENT OF STATE'S INTERNATIONAL CHANCERY CENTER (SA-33)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TATITLEK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of State (Department of State).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2018-11-01. End: 2026-08-31.

What is the specific justification provided by the Department of State for awarding this facilities maintenance contract on a sole-source basis to Tatitlek Technologies, LLC?

The provided data does not include the specific justification for the sole-source award. Typically, sole-source procurements are justified under specific circumstances outlined in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), such as when only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services, or in cases of urgent and compelling need. For this contract, the Department of State would have had to document why Tatitlek Technologies, LLC was the only viable option, potentially due to unique capabilities, proprietary knowledge, or a prior relationship that made them indispensable for the International Chancery Center's maintenance. Without this documentation, it is difficult to fully assess the necessity and fairness of the procurement process.

How does the $8 million contract value compare to similar facilities maintenance contracts for diplomatic facilities or large federal buildings?

Comparing the $8 million contract value for facilities maintenance at the International Chancery Center requires context regarding the scope of services, the size and complexity of the facility, and the duration of the contract. The contract runs for nearly eight years, meaning the annual value is approximately $1 million. This figure needs to be benchmarked against similar contracts for large, high-security federal buildings or diplomatic missions. Factors such as geographic location (cost of labor and materials in D.C.), specific maintenance requirements (HVAC, electrical, plumbing, security systems, groundskeeping), and service level agreements will significantly influence cost. Without access to a database of comparable contracts with detailed scopes, a precise benchmark is not feasible, but an annual cost of $1 million for comprehensive maintenance of a major federal facility is within a plausible range, though the lack of competition warrants scrutiny.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract, and how is Tatitlek Technologies, LLC's performance being measured?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or service level agreements (SLAs) for this contract. However, for a facilities maintenance contract of this nature, typical KPIs would likely include response times for emergency repairs, preventative maintenance completion rates, building system uptime (e.g., HVAC, power), customer satisfaction ratings from facility occupants, and adherence to safety and security protocols. Performance measurement would usually involve regular reporting by the contractor, site inspections by government personnel, and potentially formal performance reviews at set intervals. The effectiveness of the firm-fixed-price structure relies on clearly defined and measurable performance standards to ensure the contractor meets the Department of State's requirements.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities maintenance at the International Chancery Center, and how does this $8 million award fit within that trend?

The provided data indicates this contract began in November 2018 and is set to end in August 2026, spanning approximately 7 years and 9 months. The total award amount is $8,002,142.75. This suggests an average annual spending of roughly $1.03 million for facilities maintenance at the International Chancery Center during this period. Without historical data prior to November 2018 for this specific facility, it's impossible to determine if this award represents an increase, decrease, or continuation of previous spending trends. Understanding the facility's maintenance history, any major upgrades or renovations during this period, and prior contract values would be necessary to contextualize this spending pattern effectively.

Are there any identified risks associated with Tatitlek Technologies, LLC's performance on this or similar federal contracts?

The provided data does not contain specific risk flags or performance issues related to Tatitlek Technologies, LLC. However, general risks associated with sole-source, long-term facilities maintenance contracts include potential complacency from the contractor, lack of incentive for innovation, and the risk of cost overruns if the initial fixed price was not accurately estimated for the entire duration. Without access to past performance evaluations, contractor CPARS (Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System) reports, or any formal disputes or claims filed against Tatitlek Technologies, LLC, a specific risk assessment for this contractor is not possible based solely on the provided data.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Tatitlek Corporation

Address: 561 E 36TH AVE, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Government, Native American Tribal Government, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,272,052

Exercised Options: $16,193,017

Current Obligation: $8,002,143

Actual Outlays: $1,787,477

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 19AQMM18D0118

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline