US Marshals Service Awards $73.6M IT Contract to BAE Systems for Core Enterprise Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $73,632,435 ($73.6M)

Contractor: BAE Systems Technology Solutions & Services Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2024-09-23

End Date: 2026-04-22

Contract Duration: 576 days

Daily Burn Rate: $127.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: THE U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE (USMS) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION (ITD), FUNCTIONAL OPERATIONS AND RESOURCES FOR CORE ENTERPRISE SERVICES (FORCE). ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF NITAAC CIO-SP3 GWAC #HHSN316201200007W IDIQ APPLY. SAF 52.232-18.

Place of Performance

Location: ROCKVILLE, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20850

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $73.6 million to BAE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS & SERVICES INC. for work described as: THE U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE (USMS) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION (ITD), FUNCTIONAL OPERATIONS AND RESOURCES FOR CORE ENTERPRISE SERVICES (FORCE). ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF NITAAC CIO-SP3 GWAC #HHSN316201200007W IDIQ APPLY. SAF 52.232-18. Key points: 1. Contract awarded to BAE Systems for IT services supporting the US Marshals Service. 2. Utilizes the NITAAC CIO-SP3 GWAC, a pre-competed vehicle, indicating some level of prior vetting. 3. The contract is for Computer Systems Design Services, a common IT requirement. 4. The Time and Materials pricing structure may pose a risk for cost overruns if not managed closely.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $73.6M over approximately 1.5 years appears reasonable for comprehensive IT support services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale IT service contracts would provide a more precise assessment, but the scale suggests a significant undertaking.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, utilizing the NITAAC CIO-SP3 GWAC. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows a broad range of qualified vendors to participate, leading to potentially better value.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of a GWAC and full and open competition suggests efforts to secure competitive pricing, which is beneficial for taxpayers. However, the Time and Materials (T&M) pricing model requires careful oversight to ensure costs remain controlled.

Public Impact

Ensures continued operation and modernization of critical IT systems for the U.S. Marshals Service. Supports law enforcement and judicial functions through reliable technology infrastructure. Potential for job creation within the IT sector, particularly for BAE Systems employees.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials pricing model can lead to cost overruns.
Contract duration is relatively short, potentially leading to frequent re-competes.
No specific small business participation noted.

Positive Signals

Awarded under a pre-competed GWAC.
Full and open competition ensures broad market access.
Supports critical law enforcement functions.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically Computer Systems Design Services. Spending in this area is substantial across federal agencies, supporting everything from administrative functions to mission-critical operations. Benchmarks for similar IT service contracts vary widely based on scope and complexity.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). There is no explicit mention of small business subcontracting goals or participation in the provided details. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses are involved as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is a delivery order under an existing GWAC (NITAAC CIO-SP3), which implies some level of pre-existing oversight and compliance. However, the Time and Materials pricing structure necessitates robust oversight from the USMS to monitor performance and control costs effectively.

Related Government Programs

Computer Systems Design Services
Department of Justice Contracting
U.S. Marshals Service Programs

Risk Flags

Time and Materials pricing model.
Lack of explicit small business participation.
Potential for cost overruns without strict oversight.
Short contract duration may lead to frequent re-procurement efforts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $73.6 million to BAE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS & SERVICES INC.. THE U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE (USMS) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION (ITD), FUNCTIONAL OPERATIONS AND RESOURCES FOR CORE ENTERPRISE SERVICES (FORCE). ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF NITAAC CIO-SP3 GWAC #HHSN316201200007W IDIQ APPLY. SAF 52.232-18.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BAE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS & SERVICES INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (U.S. Marshals Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $73.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-09-23. End: 2026-04-22.

What is the projected cost efficiency of this Time and Materials contract compared to a Firm-Fixed-Price alternative for similar services?

Time and Materials (T&M) contracts offer flexibility but can be less cost-efficient than Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) if not managed diligently. Without detailed task breakdowns and labor hour estimates, it's difficult to definitively compare. However, T&M contracts generally carry a higher risk of cost escalation due to fluctuating labor hours and rates, potentially leading to higher overall spending for the government if oversight is lax.

What are the specific performance metrics and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) in place to ensure BAE Systems delivers effectively under this contract?

The provided data does not detail the specific performance metrics or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract. Effective oversight requires clearly defined deliverables, quality standards, and response times. The USMS would need to have these established within the contract's statement of work to ensure accountability and measure the contractor's performance against expectations.

How does the NITAAC CIO-SP3 GWAC structure ensure ongoing competition and value for money throughout the life of the underlying contract vehicle?

The NITAAC CIO-SP3 GWAC itself was awarded through full and open competition, establishing a pool of pre-vetted vendors. Individual task orders, like this one, are then competed among eligible awardees. This structure promotes competition at the task order level while leveraging the initial vetting of the GWAC, aiming to streamline procurement and ensure competitive pricing for specific agency needs.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - END USER

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 15M10424RA4700005

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Ball Corporation

Address: 520 GAITHER ROAD, ROCKVILLE, MD, 20850

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $73,632,435

Exercised Options: $73,632,435

Current Obligation: $73,632,435

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 45

Total Subaward Amount: $12,387,215

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HHSN316201200007W

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline