DOJ awards $2.2M for OCDETF Program Support, with Deloitte Consulting leading administrative management services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,202,663 ($2.2M)

Contractor: Deloitte Consulting LLP

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2024-04-01

End Date: 2025-03-31

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: OCDETF PROGRAM SUPPORT SERVICES (IOC-2 SUPPORT)

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22209

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $2.2 million to DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP for work described as: OCDETF PROGRAM SUPPORT SERVICES (IOC-2 SUPPORT) Key points: 1. Contract focuses on administrative management and general management consulting. 2. Awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Delivery order under a larger contract structure. 4. Performance period spans one year, ending March 2025. 5. Contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control challenges. 6. Small business participation is not explicitly mandated. 7. Geographic focus is Virginia.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $2.2 million for one year of administrative management and general management consulting services appears moderate for a federal contract of this nature. Benchmarking against similar contracts for management consulting services within the Department of Justice or other agencies would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The Time and Materials (T&M) contract type, while flexible, requires diligent oversight to ensure costs remain within reasonable bounds and do not escalate unexpectedly. Without specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns, a definitive assessment of cost-effectiveness is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The number of bidders is not specified, but this method generally fosters price discovery and encourages competitive pricing. The open nature of the competition suggests that the Department of Justice sought the best value from a wide range of potential contractors, which is a positive indicator for efficient use of taxpayer funds.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors, potentially resulting in better service delivery at a lower cost.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Department of Justice, specifically the Offices, Boards and Divisions, which will receive administrative and management support. Services delivered include general management consulting, aimed at improving operational efficiency and administrative processes. The geographic impact is primarily within Virginia, where the services are likely to be performed or managed. Workforce implications may include the utilization of Deloitte Consulting LLP's personnel for these support functions, potentially augmenting existing DOJ staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored.
Lack of specific small business set-aside may limit opportunities for smaller firms.
Limited public information on specific performance metrics makes value assessment difficult.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
Contract duration of one year allows for regular performance review and potential adjustments.
Contractor, Deloitte Consulting LLP, is a large, established firm with significant federal contracting experience.

Sector Analysis

Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611) represent a significant segment of the federal contracting market, encompassing a wide array of advisory and support functions. This contract fits within the broader professional services sector, where agencies procure expertise to enhance efficiency, strategy, and operations. Comparable spending benchmarks for this category vary widely based on scope and duration, but federal spending on management consulting is consistently in the billions annually.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a specific small business set-aside. While Deloitte Consulting LLP is a large business, the terms of the contract do not explicitly mandate subcontracting goals for small businesses. This means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract may be limited unless they are part of Deloitte's subcontracting plan, which is not detailed here. The impact on the small business ecosystem is neutral to potentially negative if subcontracting opportunities are not actively pursued.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Justice's contracting officers and program managers. As a delivery order under a larger contract, it inherits the oversight framework of the parent contract. Accountability measures would be tied to the performance standards outlined in the contract and the Time and Materials reporting requirements. Transparency is moderate, as contract awards are publicly reported, but detailed performance data and cost justifications are often internal.

Related Government Programs

Department of Justice Administrative Support Contracts
Federal Management Consulting Services
OCDETF Program Support
General Services Administration (GSA) Schedules

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials contract type.
Lack of specific small business subcontracting requirements.
Limited public data on performance metrics and detailed cost breakdowns.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $2.2 million to DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP. OCDETF PROGRAM SUPPORT SERVICES (IOC-2 SUPPORT)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Offices, Boards and Divisions).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-04-01. End: 2025-03-31.

What is Deloitte Consulting LLP's track record with the Department of Justice and similar administrative support contracts?

Deloitte Consulting LLP is a major federal contractor with a substantial history of performing services across various government agencies, including the Department of Justice. Their track record typically involves large-scale IT, management consulting, and professional services. For administrative support and management consulting, they often leverage their extensive resources and expertise. Specific to the DOJ, their past performance would likely include contracts related to program management, operational efficiency improvements, and strategic planning. A detailed review of their contract history with DOJ would reveal specific projects, performance ratings, and any past issues or commendations. Their experience with similar Time and Materials contracts suggests familiarity with the required reporting and oversight mechanisms, though the success of such contracts heavily relies on diligent government oversight to manage costs effectively.

How does the $2.2 million contract value compare to similar administrative management consulting services procured by the DOJ or other federal agencies?

The $2.2 million contract value for one year of administrative management and general management consulting services is within a common range for federal contracts of this nature, particularly for specialized support functions. However, without knowing the specific scope of work, the number of personnel involved, and the required expertise, a precise comparison is difficult. Agencies like the Department of Defense or the General Services Administration also procure similar services, with contract values ranging from hundreds of thousands to tens of millions of dollars annually, depending on the complexity and duration. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure means the final cost can fluctuate based on actual hours worked and material costs, making direct value comparisons challenging without detailed performance data and labor rates. Benchmarking against contracts with similar NAICS codes (541611) and contract types (T&M) would be necessary for a more accurate assessment of value for money.

What are the primary risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for administrative support services, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risk with Time and Materials (T&M) contracts is the potential for cost overruns, as the government pays for the actual labor hours and materials used, plus a fixed fee or percentage. This can lead to unpredictable expenditures if not managed closely. For administrative support services, risks include scope creep, inefficient use of labor hours, and inflated material costs. Mitigation strategies employed by the government typically involve robust oversight by contracting officers and technical monitors, detailed tracking and reporting of all labor hours and expenses, establishing ceiling prices, and conducting regular reviews of invoices and performance. Clear definition of tasks and deliverables, along with strong communication channels with the contractor, are also crucial to prevent scope creep and ensure efficient service delivery within budgetary expectations.

What is the expected impact of these administrative support services on the operational effectiveness of the OCDETF Program?

The expected impact of these administrative support services on the OCDETF (Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces) Program is to enhance its operational effectiveness by streamlining administrative processes and providing expert management consulting. This can translate into improved resource allocation, more efficient workflow management, better strategic planning, and optimized operational support. By offloading certain administrative burdens to specialized consultants, the core personnel of the OCDETF Program can focus more intensely on their primary mission of combating organized crime and drug trafficking. The services aim to identify inefficiencies, recommend process improvements, and assist in the implementation of best practices, ultimately contributing to a more agile and effective program response to complex criminal activities.

How has federal spending on administrative management and general management consulting services (NAICS 541611) trended over the past five years?

Federal spending on administrative management and general management consulting services (NAICS 541611) has generally shown a consistent upward trend over the past five years, reflecting the government's ongoing need for specialized expertise to improve efficiency and effectiveness across various agencies. While specific figures fluctuate annually based on agency budgets and priorities, the overall market for these services remains robust. Factors contributing to this trend include increasing complexity of government operations, the need for digital transformation and modernization, and a continuous drive for cost savings and performance improvements. Agencies frequently leverage external consultants for strategic planning, process re-engineering, IT strategy, and program management support. This sustained demand indicates a stable and significant market for firms providing these essential services to the federal government.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1919 N LYNN ST, ARLINGTON, VA, 22209

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,638,009

Exercised Options: $2,638,009

Current Obligation: $2,202,663

Actual Outlays: $1,722,007

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 4

Total Subaward Amount: $1,514,911

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QRAA18D001P

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline