DOJ awards $25M to Leidos for litigation support, raising value-for-money questions
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $25,078,160 ($25.1M)
Contractor: Leidos, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Justice
Start Date: 2021-06-01
End Date: 2026-05-31
Contract Duration: 1,825 days
Daily Burn Rate: $13.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: MEGA5 LITIGATION SUPPORT SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: RESTON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20190
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Justice obligated $25.1 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: MEGA5 LITIGATION SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process. 2. Leidos, Inc. is a large, established government contractor with a broad portfolio. 3. The contract's duration of five years (1825 days) indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. The use of Time and Materials pricing can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not closely managed. 5. The specific services provided under 'All Other Legal Services' warrant further clarity on their necessity and scope. 6. Benchmarking against similar litigation support contracts is crucial to assess value. 7. The absence of small business set-aside suggests large prime contractor focus.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $25,078,160.47 over five years averages approximately $5 million annually. Without specific details on the scope of litigation support services, it is difficult to benchmark against similar contracts. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing model, while flexible, carries inherent risks of cost escalation if not meticulously monitored. Further analysis of the specific tasks and deliverables would be needed to determine if this represents a fair price for the value received, especially when compared to potential alternative service providers or in-house capabilities.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that the Department of Justice sought proposals from all responsible sources. The number of bidders is not specified, but this method generally promotes a competitive environment, theoretically leading to better pricing and service offerings. The agency's decision to use full and open competition suggests confidence in the market's ability to provide the required litigation support services.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for competitive pricing and encourages a wider range of solutions, potentially leading to cost savings.
Public Impact
The Department of Justice benefits from specialized litigation support services to manage its caseload. Legal professionals and support staff within the DOJ will likely utilize these services. The services are expected to be delivered primarily within Virginia, where the contractor is located. The contract supports the operational efficiency of the federal justice system.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Time and Materials pricing can lead to unpredictable costs if not managed rigorously.
- The broad 'All Other Legal Services' category lacks specificity, making performance assessment challenging.
- Lack of small business participation may limit opportunities for smaller, specialized firms.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process.
- Leidos, Inc. is a well-established contractor with a proven track record in government services.
- The contract duration suggests a stable, ongoing need, allowing for potential efficiency gains through long-term partnership.
Sector Analysis
The legal services sector within government contracting is diverse, encompassing a wide range of support functions from administrative to highly specialized legal expertise. This contract falls under 'All Other Legal Services' (NAICS 541199), which is a broad category. Spending in this area is often driven by the volume and complexity of litigation faced by federal agencies. Benchmarking against other agencies' spending on similar broad legal support services would provide context, but the specific nature of DOJ's litigation needs makes direct comparisons difficult without more granular data.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, and the data indicates no small business participation (sb: false). This suggests that the primary award went to a large business, Leidos, Inc. While large prime contractors may utilize small businesses for subcontracting, there is no explicit indication of this occurring here. The lack of a small business set-aside means that opportunities for smaller, specialized legal support firms to compete directly for this prime contract were not prioritized.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Justice's contracting officers and program managers. The contract's performance will be monitored against the terms and conditions outlined in the delivery order. Transparency regarding the specific tasks performed and costs incurred would be subject to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, though detailed operational data may be considered sensitive. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Justice Litigation Support Contracts
- Federal Legal Services Procurement
- Time and Materials Contracts
- Government-wide Legal Support Services
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing.
- Lack of specific service details within the broad 'All Other Legal Services' category.
- Long contract duration may reduce flexibility and increase long-term cost exposure.
- Limited visibility into small business subcontracting opportunities.
Tags
department-of-justice, litigation-support, leidos-inc, full-and-open-competition, time-and-materials, legal-services, delivery-order, virginia, professional-services, large-business
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Justice awarded $25.1 million to LEIDOS, INC.. MEGA5 LITIGATION SUPPORT SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Offices, Boards and Divisions).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $25.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2021-06-01. End: 2026-05-31.
What is the specific nature of the 'All Other Legal Services' being provided by Leidos, Inc. under this contract?
The 'All Other Legal Services' category (NAICS 541199) is exceptionally broad and can encompass a wide array of support functions that do not fit into more specific legal service categories. For this specific contract with the Department of Justice, these services could potentially include tasks such as document review and management, e-discovery support, legal research assistance, paralegal support, administrative support for litigation teams, expert witness location and management, and other ancillary legal functions. Without access to the detailed statement of work (SOW) or task orders issued under this delivery order, the precise nature of the services remains undefined. Understanding the granular details of these services is critical for assessing their necessity, efficiency, and value for money.
How does the pricing structure (Time and Materials) compare to other litigation support contracts awarded by the DOJ or similar agencies?
Time and Materials (T&M) contracts offer flexibility by reimbursing the contractor for direct labor hours at specified hourly rates and for the actual cost of materials used. While common for services where the scope is not well-defined at the outset, T&M contracts carry a higher risk of cost overruns compared to fixed-price contracts. Benchmarking T&M rates for litigation support services against similar contracts awarded by the Department of Justice or other federal agencies is essential. Factors to consider include the average hourly rates for different labor categories (e.g., project managers, analysts, support staff), the typical markup on materials, and the frequency of cost ceiling breaches. A comparative analysis would reveal if Leidos's rates are competitive and if the contract includes adequate cost controls and a sufficiently low ceiling to mitigate excessive spending.
What is Leidos, Inc.'s track record with similar government contracts, particularly in litigation support?
Leidos, Inc. is a major government contractor with extensive experience across various sectors, including defense, intelligence, and civil government. They have a significant portfolio of contracts involving IT services, systems integration, and professional services, which often include elements of support that could be applied to litigation. To assess their track record specifically for litigation support, one would need to examine past performance evaluations, any reported contract disputes or terminations, and the successful completion of similar large-scale support services for federal agencies. Information on their past performance on contracts with the Department of Justice or other legal entities would be particularly relevant. A review of contract databases and agency performance reports would provide insights into their reliability, quality of service, and ability to manage complex projects within budget and schedule.
What are the potential risks associated with a five-year Time and Materials contract for litigation support?
A five-year Time and Materials (T&M) contract for litigation support presents several potential risks. Firstly, the extended duration increases the opportunity for cost escalation, as labor rates and material costs can fluctuate over time, and the T&M structure incentivizes billing hours rather than focusing solely on efficient task completion. Secondly, the lack of a clearly defined scope at the outset, inherent in T&M, can lead to scope creep or a misalignment between contractor effort and agency needs. Thirdly, without robust oversight and detailed reporting, it can be challenging for the agency to ensure that all billed hours and materials are necessary, reasonable, and allocable to the contract's objectives. Finally, the contractor may have less incentive to innovate or find efficiencies if their primary revenue stream is based on hours worked.
How does the $25 million contract value compare to historical DOJ spending on litigation support services?
To assess how the $25 million contract value compares to historical DOJ spending on litigation support, one would need to analyze historical contract data for the Department of Justice over several fiscal years. This analysis should focus on contracts categorized under similar NAICS codes (e.g., 541199 - All Other Legal Services, or potentially others related to legal support, document management, or e-discovery). Key metrics to examine would include the total annual spending on litigation support, the average contract value, the number of contracts awarded, and the primary contractors receiving these awards. Comparing the current contract's total value and annual average ($5 million/year) against these historical trends would indicate whether this award represents a significant increase, decrease, or is in line with past spending patterns. Such a comparison is crucial for identifying potential anomalies or confirming consistent investment in these services.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Legal Services › All Other Legal Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Address: 1750 PRESIDENTS ST, RESTON, VA, 20190
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $27,635,924
Exercised Options: $25,078,160
Current Obligation: $25,078,160
Actual Outlays: $20,326,640
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 15JPSS20D00000372
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2021-06-01
Current End Date: 2026-05-31
Potential End Date: 2027-05-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-07
More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other Department of Justice Contracts
- Contractor Owned and Operated Existing Correctional Facility for Approximately 3,500 LOW Security Male Inmates — $794.5M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)
- Detention Services - SAN Diego — $776.9M (THE GEO Group, Inc.)
- CO: Telly Renfroe Award of NEW Task Order Base Year Initial Funding — $616.4M (AT&T Enterprises, LLC)
- TAS 151060 - Services for the Management and Operation of a Contractor-Owned, Contractor-Operated, Correctional Facility for 2,567 Beds in Adams County, Mississippi — $574.3M (Corecivic, Inc.)
- Provide Services for the Management and Operation of a Correctional Facility in Accordance With Rfp-Pcc-0014 — $568.9M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)