DOJ awards BAE Systems $13.4M for intelligence analysis, extending services through March 2026

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,408,030 ($13.4M)

Contractor: BAE Systems Technology Solutions & Services Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-09-17

End Date: 2026-03-31

Contract Duration: 195 days

Daily Burn Rate: $68.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: BRIDGE CONTRACT FOR INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS SERVICES - TSC

Place of Performance

Location: ROCKVILLE, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20850

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $13.4 million to BAE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS & SERVICES INC. for work described as: BRIDGE CONTRACT FOR INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS SERVICES - TSC Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in intelligence analysis capabilities. 2. BAE Systems, a major defense contractor, brings substantial experience to this role. 3. The contract's duration suggests a need for sustained intelligence support. 4. Performance will be crucial given the sensitive nature of intelligence analysis. 5. This award falls within the broader category of engineering and technical services for federal agencies.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $13.4 million for approximately 195 days of service appears reasonable for specialized intelligence analysis. Benchmarking against similar intelligence support contracts is challenging due to data limitations, but the price per day is within expected ranges for high-skill technical services. The Time and Materials pricing structure allows for flexibility but requires diligent oversight to manage costs effectively.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters competitive pricing and encourages a wider pool of qualified contractors. The FBI's decision to use full and open competition suggests confidence in achieving best value through a broad market search.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is favorable for taxpayers as it typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified vendors, maximizing the value of federal dollars spent.

Public Impact

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is the primary beneficiary, receiving critical intelligence analysis support. Services delivered are essential for national security and law enforcement operations. The contract's performance is likely concentrated in Maryland, where the contractor is located. This contract supports highly skilled technical and analytical roles within the intelligence community.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically engineering services (NAICS 541330). This sector is vital for government operations, providing specialized expertise that agencies often cannot maintain in-house. The market for intelligence analysis services is competitive, with a mix of large defense contractors and specialized firms vying for these high-value contracts. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish precisely due to the classified nature of some intelligence work, but contracts for similar analytical and engineering support typically range from millions to tens of millions of dollars annually.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. The award to a large prime contractor like BAE Systems suggests that subcontracting opportunities may exist, but their extent and focus are not detailed here. Further analysis would be needed to determine the potential impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will primarily reside with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Given it is a delivery order under a larger contract, the parent contract likely has established oversight mechanisms. Performance monitoring, invoicing review, and adherence to contract terms will be key accountability measures. Transparency is generally limited for intelligence-related contracts, but internal agency oversight and potential Inspector General reviews would apply.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-justice, federal-bureau-of-investigation, maryland, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, time-and-materials, intelligence-analysis, national-security, professional-scientific-and-technical-services

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $13.4 million to BAE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS & SERVICES INC.. BRIDGE CONTRACT FOR INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS SERVICES - TSC

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BAE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS & SERVICES INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Bureau of Investigation).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-17. End: 2026-03-31.

What is BAE Systems' track record with the FBI and other intelligence agencies for similar services?

BAE Systems Technology Solutions & Services Inc. has a significant history of providing a wide range of technical, engineering, and support services to various U.S. government agencies, including defense and intelligence entities. While specific details on past FBI contracts for intelligence analysis are not publicly itemized in this data, BAE Systems is a well-established prime contractor on numerous large federal contracts. Their experience typically encompasses areas like systems engineering, cybersecurity, information technology, and mission support. The company's extensive portfolio suggests a capacity to handle complex analytical tasks. However, a deeper dive into past performance reviews, contract awards, and any reported issues with the FBI or similar agencies would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment of their specific track record for this type of intelligence analysis work.

How does the $13.4 million contract value compare to similar intelligence analysis contracts awarded by the FBI or other agencies?

Directly comparing the $13.4 million value for approximately 195 days of service is challenging due to the often-classified nature of intelligence analysis contracts and the variability in scope, duration, and required expertise. However, for specialized technical and analytical support services, this value appears within a reasonable range for a contract of this duration awarded to a large, experienced contractor like BAE Systems. Many intelligence support contracts can run into tens or hundreds of millions of dollars over multiple years. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure means the final cost could fluctuate based on actual hours worked and material costs, making a fixed-price comparison difficult. Without more specific data on comparable contracts' scope and pricing models, it's hard to definitively benchmark this award, but it doesn't immediately appear disproportionately high for the services likely entailed.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks include potential cost overruns due to the Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure, which lacks a fixed ceiling on labor hours and material expenses. Inadequate performance or failure to deliver critical intelligence insights could also pose a significant risk to national security operations. Another risk is the potential for scope creep if requirements are not clearly defined and managed. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust contract oversight by the FBI, including detailed monitoring of hours, rates, and materials used, as well as stringent performance metrics and regular reviews. Clear definition and management of the statement of work are crucial to prevent scope creep. The selection of an experienced contractor like BAE Systems also mitigates some performance risk, assuming their past performance is strong.

What is the expected effectiveness of the services provided under this contract for the FBI's mission?

The effectiveness of the intelligence analysis services is expected to be high, given the FBI's critical role in national security and law enforcement. These services are crucial for processing vast amounts of data, identifying threats, supporting investigations, and informing strategic decision-making. The contract's duration suggests a sustained need for these capabilities, implying that the services are integral to ongoing FBI operations. The effectiveness will hinge on the quality of the analysis, the timeliness of the insights provided, and how well the contractor's output integrates with the FBI's internal intelligence cycles and operational requirements. The FBI's oversight and the contractor's expertise are key determinants of this effectiveness.

How has federal spending on intelligence analysis services evolved, and where does this contract fit in?

Federal spending on intelligence analysis services has generally trended upwards over the past two decades, driven by evolving global threats, technological advancements in data collection, and the increasing complexity of information warfare. Agencies like the FBI, CIA, NSA, and others consistently require significant investment in analytical capabilities. This $13.4 million contract for the FBI represents a specific, tactical allocation within this broader spending landscape. It fits into the category of specialized support services procured to augment organic government capabilities. While this single contract is a modest portion of the overall intelligence budget, it reflects the ongoing reliance on external expertise to meet the demands of modern intelligence gathering and analysis.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Ball Corporation

Address: 520 GAITHER RD, ROCKVILLE, MD, 20850

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $17,900,871

Exercised Options: $13,408,030

Current Obligation: $13,408,030

Actual Outlays: $8,444,572

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 4

Total Subaward Amount: $1,036,215

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00F240CA

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-09-17

Current End Date: 2026-03-31

Potential End Date: 2026-05-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-03-03

More Contracts from BAE Systems Technology Solutions & Services Inc.

View all BAE Systems Technology Solutions & Services Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Justice Contracts

View all Department of Justice contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending