SAFEWARE INC awarded $440K for durable goods, a non-competed BPA call

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $44,032 ($44.0K)

Contractor: Safeware Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2026-04-07

End Date: 2026-06-06

Contract Duration: 60 days

Daily Burn Rate: $734/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: TITLE: SAFEWARE BPA ORDER FOR BOTSWANA ILEA REQUESTOR: MARC E GODLEWSKI AFT#: 2026-TR-0147 REF AWARD/BPA: 15DDHQ21A00000017 DELIVERY DATE: 05/04/2026

Place of Performance

Location: LANHAM, PRINCE GEORGES County, MARYLAND, 20706

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $44,031.98 to SAFEWARE INC for work described as: TITLE: SAFEWARE BPA ORDER FOR BOTSWANA ILEA REQUESTOR: MARC E GODLEWSKI AFT#: 2026-TR-0147 REF AWARD/BPA: 15DDHQ21A00000017 DELIVERY DATE: 05/04/2026 Key points: 1. Contract awarded to SAFEWARE INC for miscellaneous durable goods. 2. Delivery date is May 4, 2026, with a duration of 60 days. 3. The contract was not competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP). 4. This is a Firm Fixed Price contract. 5. The award falls under the Drug Enforcement Administration within the Department of Justice. 6. The NAICS code 423990 indicates 'Other Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers'.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $440,319.98 for a 60-day delivery period for miscellaneous durable goods appears high without further context on the specific items procured. Benchmarking is difficult due to the broad nature of the goods and the lack of competition. The absence of competition raises concerns about whether the government secured the best possible price.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source or limited competition award. The data explicitly states 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP'. This means that a competitive bidding process was not undertaken, potentially limiting price discovery and the opportunity for other vendors to offer their goods or services.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition means taxpayers may not have benefited from the most cost-effective pricing that a competitive bidding process could have yielded.

Public Impact

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is the primary beneficiary, receiving necessary durable goods. The services delivered involve the provision of miscellaneous durable goods. The geographic impact is likely focused on DEA operations within Maryland, where the contract is registered. Workforce implications are minimal, primarily related to the supplier's logistics and delivery.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition raises concerns about price reasonableness.
Broad description of 'durable goods' makes it difficult to assess specific value.
Short delivery window may have necessitated a non-competitive award, but this needs verification.

Positive Signals

Awarded to a single vendor, potentially streamlining the procurement process for urgent needs.
Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty for the government.

Sector Analysis

The procurement of miscellaneous durable goods falls under the broader wholesale trade sector. The NAICS code 423990 covers a wide range of businesses that sell durable goods to other businesses. Within federal contracting, such procurements are common but often fall into categories where competition can be robust unless specific circumstances dictate otherwise. The value of this contract is relatively small compared to major federal spending in this sector.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not competed and the 'sb' (small business) flag is false, indicating it was not set aside for small businesses. There is no information provided on subcontracting plans. This award does not appear to directly benefit the small business ecosystem through a set-aside.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be managed by the Drug Enforcement Administration contracting officers and program managers. Transparency is limited due to the non-competitive nature and lack of detailed justification in the provided data. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud or mismanagement were suspected.

Related Government Programs

General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Supply Schedules
Department of Justice Procurement Data
Drug Enforcement Administration Supply Chain Management

Risk Flags

Lack of Competition
Unspecified Goods
Potential for Price Overpayment

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $44,031.98 to SAFEWARE INC. TITLE: SAFEWARE BPA ORDER FOR BOTSWANA ILEA REQUESTOR: MARC E GODLEWSKI AFT#: 2026-TR-0147 REF AWARD/BPA: 15DDHQ21A00000017 DELIVERY DATE: 05/04/2026

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SAFEWARE INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Drug Enforcement Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $44,031.98.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-07. End: 2026-06-06.

What specific durable goods were procured under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the exact nature of the 'miscellaneous durable goods' procured. The NAICS code 423990, 'Other Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers,' indicates a broad category that could include items ranging from industrial equipment and tools to office furniture and specialized supplies. Without a detailed line-item breakdown or product description, it is impossible to ascertain the specific items. This lack of specificity makes it challenging to perform a precise value analysis or compare pricing against market benchmarks for particular goods.

What is the justification for the non-competitive award?

The data explicitly states 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP,' which implies the contract was awarded without a full and open competition. The specific justification for this non-competitive award is not provided in the data. Common reasons for non-competitive awards include urgent and compelling needs, sole-source availability of a unique product or service, or specific statutory authority. Further investigation into the contract file or agency justifications would be required to understand the precise rationale behind bypassing the competitive process for this $440,319.98 award.

How does the price compare to similar contracts or market rates?

Due to the non-competitive nature of this award and the broad description of 'miscellaneous durable goods,' a direct price comparison to similar contracts or market rates is not feasible with the given information. Without knowing the specific items, quantities, and quality standards, it's impossible to benchmark. If this were a competitive bid, the government would have received multiple price offers to evaluate. As a non-competitive award, the onus is on the agency to ensure the price is fair and reasonable, often through internal cost analysis or comparison to historical pricing for similar, albeit unspecified, goods.

What is the track record of SAFEWARE INC with the federal government?

The provided data indicates SAFEWARE INC is the contractor, but it does not offer details on their past performance or track record with the federal government. To assess their reliability and experience, one would need to consult federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS-NG for previous awards, contract performance reviews (e.g., CPARS), and any history of disputes or terminations. Without this information, it's difficult to gauge their suitability beyond this specific award.

What is the historical spending pattern for this type of procurement by the DEA?

The provided data is for a single contract award and does not offer historical spending patterns for the DEA regarding miscellaneous durable goods. To analyze historical spending, one would need to query federal procurement databases for all contracts awarded by the DEA (and potentially the broader Department of Justice) under NAICS code 423990 or similar categories over several fiscal years. This would reveal trends in contract values, competition levels, and the types of goods frequently procured, allowing for a comparison to this specific award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Wholesale Trade › Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers › Other Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers

Product/Service Code: INSTRUMENTS AND LABORATORY EQPT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4403 FORBES BLVD., LANHAM, MD, 20706

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $44,032

Exercised Options: $44,032

Current Obligation: $44,032

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15DDHQ21A00000017

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline