DOJ's $67.3M contract for mental health services awarded to South Florida Clinical Treatment Centers Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $67,290 ($67.3K)

Contractor: South Florida Clinical Treatment Centers Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-12-01

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 303 days

Daily Burn Rate: $222/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: FY26: 12/1/25 TO 9/30/26

Place of Performance

Location: FORT LAUDERDALE, BROWARD County, FLORIDA, 33306

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $67,290 to SOUTH FLORIDA CLINICAL TREATMENT CENTERS INC for work described as: FY26: 12/1/25 TO 9/30/26 Key points: 1. Contract awarded for outpatient mental health and substance abuse services. 2. Contract duration is 10 months, aligning with FY26. 3. The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP). 4. The awardee, South Florida Clinical Treatment Centers Inc., is a single entity. 5. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, providing cost certainty. 6. The contract is not set aside for small businesses. 7. The contract is a Delivery Order, indicating it's part of a larger agreement or schedule.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $67.3 million contract requires more detailed cost breakdowns and comparisons to similar service contracts within the Federal Prison System. Without specific performance metrics or unit costs, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money. However, the Firm Fixed Price structure suggests an attempt to control costs. The duration of 10 months for the full amount indicates a significant monthly expenditure, warranting scrutiny of the services delivered and their effectiveness.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which typically involves a limited number of bidders and less formal solicitation processes compared to full and open competition. While the exact number of bidders is not provided, SAP is generally used for acquisitions below the simplified acquisition threshold, suggesting a potentially less robust competitive landscape. This can sometimes lead to less aggressive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition under SAP may mean that taxpayers did not benefit from the most competitive pricing achievable through a broader solicitation process.

Public Impact

Inmates within the Federal Prison System, specifically in Florida, will benefit from outpatient mental health and substance abuse treatment. The services delivered are crucial for inmate rehabilitation and public safety. The geographic impact is concentrated in Florida, serving facilities within the Bureau of Prisons' jurisdiction. The contract supports the healthcare workforce within correctional facilities, potentially including clinical staff and administrative support.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it hard to assess effectiveness.
Limited competition under SAP could impact price competitiveness.
Dependence on a single awardee for critical services raises potential risk.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty.
Services address critical inmate needs for mental health and substance abuse.
Contract aligns with the Federal Prison System's mission.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Healthcare sector, specifically focusing on mental health and substance abuse treatment services. The market for correctional healthcare is specialized, often involving contracts with healthcare providers experienced in secure environments. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other Bureau of Prisons contracts for similar services or contracts with state correctional systems. The total value of $67.3 million for a 10-month period suggests a significant operational scale.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a small business set-aside. The focus is on larger, established providers capable of meeting the demands of correctional healthcare.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Justice's Bureau of Prisons. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed operational oversight specifics are internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Federal Bureau of Prisons Healthcare Contracts
Department of Justice Mental Health Services
Outpatient Treatment Services Contracts
Correctional Facility Healthcare

Risk Flags

Potential for service disruption due to single provider reliance.
Limited competition may impact cost-effectiveness.
Need for robust performance monitoring to ensure quality of care.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $67,290 to SOUTH FLORIDA CLINICAL TREATMENT CENTERS INC. FY26: 12/1/25 TO 9/30/26

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SOUTH FLORIDA CLINICAL TREATMENT CENTERS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $67,290.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-12-01. End: 2026-09-30.

What is the track record of South Florida Clinical Treatment Centers Inc. with federal contracts, particularly within the Bureau of Prisons?

Information regarding the specific track record of South Florida Clinical Treatment Centers Inc. with federal contracts, especially within the Bureau of Prisons, is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract history, and any documented issues or successes. Federal procurement databases and agency performance reports would be the primary sources for this information. Understanding their experience in correctional healthcare settings is crucial for evaluating their capability to deliver these sensitive services effectively and reliably.

How does the per-unit cost of services compare to similar contracts or market rates for outpatient mental health and substance abuse treatment?

The provided data does not include specific per-unit cost breakdowns for the services rendered under this $67.3 million contract. To benchmark this, one would need to identify the specific services being procured (e.g., therapy sessions, medication management, group counseling) and their associated costs. This information would then be compared against similar contracts awarded by the Bureau of Prisons or other federal agencies, as well as prevailing market rates for outpatient mental health and substance abuse treatment in the relevant geographic area (Florida). Without these granular details, a precise value-for-money assessment based on unit costs is not possible.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will success be measured?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or the methodology for measuring the success of this contract. Typically, contracts for healthcare services include metrics related to patient outcomes, access to care, quality of service delivery, and adherence to treatment protocols. For mental health and substance abuse services within a correctional setting, KPIs might include reduction in recidivism rates, improvement in patient mental health status, successful completion of treatment programs, and patient satisfaction. The Bureau of Prisons would be responsible for monitoring these KPIs and ensuring the contractor meets the agreed-upon standards.

What is the historical spending pattern for outpatient mental health and substance abuse services within the Federal Prison System?

The provided data focuses on a single contract award for FY26. To understand historical spending patterns, one would need to analyze aggregate spending data for similar services over multiple fiscal years within the Federal Prison System. This would involve examining trends in contract values, the number of contracts awarded, the types of services procured, and the primary awardees. Such an analysis would reveal whether spending in this category has been increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable, and identify any shifts in procurement strategies or service needs over time.

What are the potential risks associated with awarding a large contract for critical inmate services to a single provider?

Awarding a large contract for critical inmate services to a single provider, such as South Florida Clinical Treatment Centers Inc. for this $67.3 million contract, carries several potential risks. These include service disruption if the provider faces financial difficulties, operational issues, or legal challenges. There's also a risk of reduced innovation and responsiveness due to a lack of direct competition. Furthermore, over-reliance on one provider can create leverage issues during contract negotiations and renewals. The Bureau of Prisons would need robust contingency plans and strong oversight to mitigate these risks and ensure continuity of care for inmates.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Health Care and Social Assistance › Outpatient Care Centers › Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Centers

Product/Service Code: SOCIAL SERVICES › SOCIAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: 15BCTS20Q00000046

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2300 E OAKLAND PARK BLVD STE 201, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL, 33306

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $374,620

Exercised Options: $374,620

Current Obligation: $67,290

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15BCTS21D00000613

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline