DOJ's ATF awards $6M contract for educational support services to BESTMEDIA INC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $6,000 ($6.0K)

Contractor: Bestmedia Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2026-05-31

End Date: 2026-06-06

Contract Duration: 6 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.0K/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: INSTRUCTOR

Place of Performance

Location: BOUNTIFUL, DAVIS County, UTAH, 84010

State: Utah Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $6,000 to BESTMEDIA INC for work described as: INSTRUCTOR Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the scope of educational support services. 2. Competition dynamics for this contract need further examination to ensure optimal value. 3. Potential risks include contractor performance and adherence to service level agreements. 4. This contract supports the ATF's mission in providing essential educational resources. 5. The IT services sector is highly competitive, suggesting potential for cost efficiencies. 6. The contract duration of six months is relatively short, allowing for flexibility.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $6 million for educational support services over six months appears to be within a reasonable range for similar government contracts. Benchmarking against other educational support service contracts of comparable scope and duration would provide a more precise assessment of value for money. The firm fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor assumes the risk for cost overruns, which can be beneficial for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was competed under SAP (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), indicating a competitive process suitable for acquisitions below certain thresholds. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, the use of SAP generally encourages competition among qualified vendors. This approach aims to ensure fair pricing and access to a range of service providers.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the procurement process, even under SAP, is intended to drive down costs and ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by selecting the most cost-effective offer.

Public Impact

Law enforcement personnel and trainees will benefit from enhanced educational support services. The contract will deliver critical training and educational materials. Services are expected to be delivered primarily in Utah. The contract may have implications for the workforce involved in providing these educational services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if requirements are not clearly defined.
Ensuring timely delivery of services to meet ATF's educational needs.
Monitoring contractor performance to ensure quality and compliance.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract structure limits government financial risk.
Use of SAP suggests a competitive bidding process.
Contract duration allows for evaluation of performance before potential extension.

Sector Analysis

The educational support services sector is a vital component of government operations, providing essential training and development resources. This contract fits within the broader IT and professional services market, which is characterized by a wide array of specialized providers. Government spending in this area is often driven by the need for continuous professional development and specialized training for its workforce.

Small Business Impact

Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting plans was not explicitly provided in the data. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses had opportunities to participate in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors, and to assess the overall impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Acquisition and Property Management Division. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract terms, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award announcements and public databases, though specific oversight details for this contract require further investigation.

Related Government Programs

Federal Law Enforcement Training
Government Educational Services
Professional Development Contracts

Risk Flags

Contract duration is short, requiring potential re-competition or extension.
Specific performance metrics and quality standards need close monitoring.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $6,000 to BESTMEDIA INC. INSTRUCTOR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BESTMEDIA INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Acquisition and Property Management Division).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $6,000.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-05-31. End: 2026-06-06.

What is the track record of BESTMEDIA INC. in performing similar government contracts?

A review of federal contract databases would be necessary to ascertain BESTMEDIA INC.'s past performance on similar government contracts. This would involve examining contract history, performance evaluations (e.g., CPARS), and any reported disputes or terminations. Understanding their experience with educational support services, particularly for law enforcement agencies, would provide insight into their capability to meet the ATF's requirements. A strong track record would indicate a lower risk of performance issues, while a history of challenges might warrant closer monitoring.

How does the $6 million contract value compare to similar educational support service contracts awarded by other federal agencies?

Benchmarking this $6 million contract against similar educational support service contracts requires access to a broader dataset of federal procurements. Factors such as the duration of the contract (6 months), the specific services offered (educational support), and the geographic location (Utah) would need to be considered. If comparable contracts for similar services and durations are significantly lower or higher, it could indicate either exceptional value or potential overpricing. Without direct comparisons, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks for this contract include potential contractor underperformance, failure to meet service level agreements, and the possibility of scope creep if requirements are not precisely defined. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract management, clear performance metrics, regular progress reviews, and a firm fixed-price structure that incentivizes the contractor to manage costs. The relatively short duration also allows the ATF to reassess the contract and contractor performance before committing to longer terms.

How effective is the ATF's use of Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) for procuring educational support services?

The use of SAP for this $6 million contract suggests the ATF is leveraging streamlined procurement processes for acquisitions below certain thresholds. SAP is designed to increase efficiency and reduce administrative burden, potentially leading to faster contract awards. However, the effectiveness hinges on ensuring adequate competition and fair pricing within the SAP framework. For educational support services, SAP can be effective if the market has sufficient vendors capable of meeting the requirements within the simplified procedures.

What is the historical spending pattern for educational support services by the ATF or similar agencies?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for educational support services by the ATF and comparable agencies would provide context for the current $6 million award. This involves examining trends in contract values, durations, and the types of services procured over several fiscal years. Understanding whether this award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of spending can inform budget planning and identify potential shifts in programmatic needs or contracting strategies.

What specific educational support services are included in this contract, and how do they align with ATF's mission objectives?

The contract specifies 'Educational Support Services,' which is broad. To assess alignment, a detailed breakdown of the services is required. This could include curriculum development, training delivery, e-learning platform management, or logistical support for educational programs. These services must directly contribute to the ATF's mission, such as enhancing agent training, improving investigative techniques, or supporting compliance education. The effectiveness of the contract is measured by how well these services achieve their intended educational outcomes and support the ATF's strategic goals.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Educational Services › Educational Support Services › Educational Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 457 W 2400 S, BOUNTIFUL, UT, 84010

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $6,000

Exercised Options: $6,000

Current Obligation: $6,000

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15A00022AAQA00110

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline