National Park Service awards $119,630 contract for historic Grange preservation and rehabilitation services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $119,630 ($119.6K)

Contractor: Gwwo, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2025-02-06

End Date: 2026-05-29

Contract Duration: 477 days

Daily Burn Rate: $251/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: CUIS 258139 - PRESERVE AND REHABILITATE THE HISTORIC GRANGE - AE TITLE III SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: DENVER, JEFFERSON County, COLORADO, 80225

State: Colorado Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $119,630.1 to GWWO, INC. for work described as: CUIS 258139 - PRESERVE AND REHABILITATE THE HISTORIC GRANGE - AE TITLE III SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded to GWWO, INC. for architectural services. 2. Project focuses on preserving and rehabilitating the historic Grange. 3. Contract duration is 477 days, ending May 29, 2026. 4. Procurement method was full and open competition. 5. Contract type is Firm Fixed Price, indicating predictable costs. 6. Services fall under architectural services NAICS code 541310. 7. Geographic location for services is Colorado.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $119,630 for architectural services related to historic preservation appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar projects for historic site rehabilitation by the National Park Service or other federal agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure helps control costs for this specific project.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting that multiple qualified firms had the opportunity to bid. The number of bidders is not specified, but this procurement method generally fosters competitive pricing and allows the government to select the best value offer. The open competition is a positive indicator for price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that aims to secure the most cost-effective solution for preserving a historic asset.

Public Impact

The public benefits from the preservation of a historic site, the Grange, ensuring its availability for future generations. Architectural services will be delivered to support the rehabilitation and preservation efforts. The geographic impact is localized to Colorado, where the historic Grange is located. The contract supports specialized architectural and preservation workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if unforeseen structural issues arise during rehabilitation.
Dependence on specialized architectural expertise for historic preservation.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract limits cost overruns.
Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process.
Award to a single contractor streamlines project management.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the Architectural Services sector (NAICS 541310), a segment of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. This sector is crucial for government infrastructure projects, particularly those involving historic preservation. Spending in this area is often driven by the need to maintain federal assets and comply with heritage protection mandates. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other contracts for historic building rehabilitation across federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

The contract details do not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions. GWWO, INC. is listed as the awardee, and further investigation would be needed to determine if they are a small business or a large business. There is no explicit mention of subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the National Park Service contracting officers and project managers. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, though specific performance metrics and oversight reports are not detailed here.

Related Government Programs

National Park Service Historic Preservation Fund
Federal Historic Preservation Programs
Architectural and Engineering Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for unforeseen conditions in historic structures
Dependence on specialized contractor expertise
Timeliness of regulatory approvals for historic sites

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $119,630.1 to GWWO, INC.. CUIS 258139 - PRESERVE AND REHABILITATE THE HISTORIC GRANGE - AE TITLE III SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GWWO, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (National Park Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $119,630.1.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-02-06. End: 2026-05-29.

What is the track record of GWWO, INC. with the National Park Service and similar historic preservation projects?

A review of GWWO, INC.'s contract history with the National Park Service and other federal agencies would be necessary to assess their track record. Specifically, examining past performance on projects of similar scope, complexity, and value related to historic preservation would provide insight into their reliability, quality of work, and ability to meet deadlines. Data on past performance evaluations, if available through federal databases like the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), would be highly valuable in this assessment. Understanding their experience with unique challenges in historic structures, such as material sourcing, regulatory compliance, and adaptive reuse, is also crucial.

How does the awarded amount compare to the estimated cost or market rates for similar architectural services for historic preservation?

To benchmark the value, one would compare the $119,630 award to the government's independent cost estimate for this project, if available. Additionally, market research on typical architectural fees for historic preservation projects of comparable size and complexity in Colorado would be informative. This would involve looking at rates charged by other architectural firms for similar services, considering factors like the age and condition of the structure, the extent of rehabilitation required, and the specific historical significance. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract suggests the government aimed to secure a defined cost, but understanding the underlying pricing structure and its relation to market norms is key to assessing value.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks include potential unforeseen conditions within the historic Grange that could increase rehabilitation costs or extend the timeline, challenges in sourcing historically accurate materials, and potential delays due to regulatory reviews or environmental considerations. Mitigation strategies likely involve thorough site assessments prior to and during the project, contingency planning within the contract scope, and close collaboration between the National Park Service and GWWO, INC. The firm fixed-price contract itself acts as a risk mitigation tool for cost certainty, provided the scope is well-defined. The contractor's experience in historic preservation is also a mitigating factor against technical risks.

How effective is the National Park Service in managing contracts for historic preservation to ensure optimal outcomes?

The effectiveness of the National Park Service (NPS) in managing historic preservation contracts can be assessed by examining the outcomes of past projects. This includes evaluating whether projects were completed on time, within budget, and to the required historical standards. The NPS's use of qualified architectural firms, robust oversight mechanisms, and adherence to preservation guidelines are critical factors. Analyzing the success rate of their competitive bidding processes and the long-term condition of preserved sites would provide further insight. The current contract's full and open competition and firm fixed-price structure suggest a standard, potentially effective, management approach.

What has been the historical spending trend for architectural services related to historic preservation by the Department of the Interior?

Analyzing historical spending data for architectural services related to historic preservation by the Department of the Interior (DOI) would reveal trends in investment in heritage assets. This would involve aggregating contract data over several fiscal years, focusing on contracts with NAICS codes like 541310 (Architectural Services) where the scope explicitly mentions historic preservation, rehabilitation, or restoration. Understanding the average contract values, the number of contracts awarded, and the primary agencies within DOI utilizing these services (like the National Park Service) would provide context. This trend analysis could highlight fluctuations in funding, identify periods of increased focus on preservation, and inform future budget allocations for similar projects.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Architectural Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ARCHITECT-ENGINEER FAR 6.102

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 800 WYMAN PARK DR STE 300, BALTIMORE, MD, 21211

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $119,630

Exercised Options: $119,630

Current Obligation: $119,630

Actual Outlays: $63,962

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 140P2022D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline