Montrose Work Center Building Construction contract awarded to DARE-CASE CONTRACTING SERVICES LLC for over $2.2 million

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,241,804 ($2.2M)

Contractor: Dare-Case Contracting Services LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture

Start Date: 2022-06-29

End Date: 2023-09-30

Contract Duration: 458 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: MONTROSE WORK CENTER BUILDING CONSTRUCTION

Place of Performance

Location: MONTROSE, MONTROSE County, COLORADO, 81401

State: Colorado Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Agriculture obligated $2.2 million to DARE-CASE CONTRACTING SERVICES LLC for work described as: MONTROSE WORK CENTER BUILDING CONSTRUCTION Key points: 1. The contract value of $2.24 million for building construction appears reasonable given the scope. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract is a firm-fixed-price definitive contract, which transfers risk to the contractor. 4. Performance is scheduled over 458 days, indicating a medium-term project. 5. The project falls under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, a common sector for federal spending. 6. The award was made by the Department of Agriculture's Forest Service. 7. The contractor, DARE-CASE CONTRACTING SERVICES LLC, is the sole awardee. 8. The contract was awarded in June 2022 and is set to end in September 2023.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $2.24 million for the Montrose Work Center building construction appears to be within a reasonable range for a project of this nature. Without specific details on the building's size, complexity, and location-specific construction costs, a direct benchmark is difficult. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor has priced the project to cover all anticipated costs and profit, and the competitive award process should have driven the price towards market value. Further analysis would require comparing this cost to similar-sized federal or commercial building projects in the region.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that the solicitation was broadly advertised, and multiple bids were likely received. The presence of 5 bids suggests a healthy level of competition for this project. A competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and ensures that the government receives proposals from a range of qualified contractors, potentially resulting in a more favorable price and better technical solutions.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of obtaining the best value by fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages innovation among bidders.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the U.S. Forest Service personnel who will utilize the new Montrose Work Center. The contract delivers the construction of a new work center building, providing essential facilities. The geographic impact is localized to Montrose, Colorado, where the work center is located. The project will likely create or sustain jobs in the construction sector in the Montrose area. The new facility is expected to improve operational efficiency for the Forest Service in its duties.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen construction challenges arise, though mitigated by firm-fixed-price.
Risk of schedule delays due to weather, material availability, or labor issues.
Ensuring the final construction meets all Forest Service operational and safety requirements.
Monitoring contractor performance to ensure quality and adherence to specifications.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.
Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process.
Award to a single contractor simplifies management and accountability.
Defined performance period (458 days) provides a clear timeline.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a significant segment of the U.S. economy. Federal agencies are consistent buyers in this market, constructing and maintaining facilities nationwide. Spending in this sector is influenced by infrastructure needs, agency expansion, and modernization efforts. Benchmarking this contract's value would involve comparing it to similar-sized construction projects undertaken by other federal agencies or state/local governments in similar geographic regions, considering prevailing construction material and labor costs.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). The award was made under full and open competition, and the contractor is DARE-CASE CONTRACTING SERVICES LLC. There is no specific information provided regarding subcontracting plans or requirements for small business participation. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this specific award is not detailed, but it does not appear to have been a primary focus of this particular procurement.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily be managed by the Department of Agriculture's Forest Service contracting officers and project managers. They are responsible for monitoring contractor performance, ensuring compliance with contract terms, and approving payments. Accountability is established through the firm-fixed-price contract, which incentivizes the contractor to complete the work within budget. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, allowing for public scrutiny of the contract details and awardee.

Related Government Programs

Federal Buildings Fund
General Services Administration (GSA) Public Buildings Service
Department of Defense Construction Projects
National Park Service Facility Management
Bureau of Land Management Infrastructure

Risk Flags

Potential for schedule delays.
Risk of unforeseen construction issues.
Ensuring final construction meets all specifications.
Contractor performance monitoring required.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Agriculture awarded $2.2 million to DARE-CASE CONTRACTING SERVICES LLC. MONTROSE WORK CENTER BUILDING CONSTRUCTION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DARE-CASE CONTRACTING SERVICES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Forest Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-06-29. End: 2023-09-30.

What is the track record of DARE-CASE CONTRACTING SERVICES LLC with federal contracts, particularly in building construction?

A review of federal procurement data would be necessary to fully assess DARE-CASE CONTRACTING SERVICES LLC's track record. This would involve examining past contract awards, performance evaluations (if available), and any history of contract modifications, disputes, or terminations. Understanding their experience with similar-sized projects, their on-time and on-budget completion rates, and their compliance history would provide crucial context for evaluating their reliability and capability in executing the Montrose Work Center construction. Without specific historical data, it's difficult to definitively assess their past performance.

How does the awarded amount of $2.24 million compare to the estimated cost or market rates for similar building construction projects in Montrose, Colorado?

To benchmark the value, one would need to compare the $2.24 million award against the estimated cost provided by the Forest Service during the solicitation phase, if publicly available. Additionally, researching the cost per square foot for similar commercial or institutional buildings constructed in the Montrose, Colorado area around the award date (June 2022) would be informative. Factors such as building size, materials used, specific functionalities required by the Forest Service, and prevailing local labor and material costs would need to be considered for an accurate comparison. The fact that 5 bids were received suggests market interest, but doesn't inherently guarantee the price was the absolute lowest possible.

What are the primary risks associated with this firm-fixed-price construction contract, and how are they being managed?

The primary risks in a firm-fixed-price construction contract generally revolve around potential cost overruns for the contractor, which could lead to quality compromises or contractor default if not managed properly. For the government, risks include schedule delays and ensuring the final product meets all specifications. The firm-fixed-price structure inherently transfers most cost risk to DARE-CASE CONTRACTING SERVICES LLC. Management of risks would involve diligent project oversight by the Forest Service, including regular site inspections, progress monitoring, and strict adherence to the contract's technical specifications and milestones. Clear communication channels and a proactive approach to identifying and resolving issues are crucial.

What is the expected effectiveness of the new Montrose Work Center once completed, in terms of supporting Forest Service operations?

The effectiveness of the new Montrose Work Center will depend on how well the completed facility meets the operational needs of the Forest Service personnel stationed there. A new, purpose-built facility is generally expected to improve efficiency, provide better working conditions, enhance safety, and potentially accommodate updated technology or equipment compared to older or inadequate facilities. Its effectiveness will be measured by its ability to support the Forest Service's mission in the region, whether that involves administrative functions, resource management, emergency response coordination, or other duties. Post-occupancy evaluations would provide the best measure of its success.

What has been the historical spending pattern for building construction by the Forest Service in Colorado over the last five years?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for building construction by the Forest Service in Colorado would require accessing and aggregating federal procurement data over the past five fiscal years. This would involve filtering contracts by agency (Forest Service), geographic location (Colorado), and the relevant North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes for building construction. Trends in spending could reveal whether this $2.24 million contract is consistent with past investment levels, or if it represents an increase or decrease in activity. It could also highlight any particular types of construction projects that have been prioritized.

Were there any specific exclusions of sources in the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' award, and what was the justification?

The designation 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' (often abbreviated as FBOE or similar) typically implies that the solicitation was publicly advertised, but certain sources were excluded from consideration based on specific criteria outlined in the solicitation. This exclusion is usually justified by factors such as the need for specific technical capabilities, past performance requirements, or unique security considerations that only a limited number of contractors could meet. The justification for excluding specific sources would be detailed in the contract's award documentation or justification for other than full and open competition, if applicable. Without access to those specific documents, the precise reasons for any exclusions remain unclear.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 1240LT22R0030

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 711 S 15TH ST, GRAND JUNCTION, CO, 81501

Business Categories: Category Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,241,804

Exercised Options: $2,241,804

Current Obligation: $2,241,804

Actual Outlays: $2,241,804

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline