DoD's $48.6M Engineering Services Contract Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $48,635,824 ($48.6M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Engineering Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-05-02

End Date: 2011-01-30

Contract Duration: 1,369 days

Daily Burn Rate: $35.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Defense

Official Description: ACQUISITION, ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING SUPPORT FOR AMCOM SAMD MSMB. ALSO, TO ADD EA 001.

Place of Performance

Location: LINTHICUM HEIGHTS, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 21090, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $48.6 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC for work described as: ACQUISITION, ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING SUPPORT FOR AMCOM SAMD MSMB. ALSO, TO ADD EA 001. Key points: 1. Contract awarded for acquisition, engineering, and manufacturing support. 2. Booz Allen Hamilton Engineering Services, LLC is the contractor. 3. The contract falls under Engineering Services (NAICS 541330). 4. Awarded under full and open competition. 5. The contract has a duration of 1369 days.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $48.6 million over approximately 3.75 years suggests a moderate annual spend. Without specific deliverables or comparable contracts, a precise pricing assessment is difficult, but it appears to be within a reasonable range for complex engineering support services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust process for soliciting bids and ensuring fair market pricing. This method generally leads to better price discovery and value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition aims to secure the best value for taxpayers by allowing all eligible vendors to compete, potentially driving down costs and improving service quality.

Public Impact

Ensures continued engineering and manufacturing support for critical Army programs. Supports acquisition processes, potentially leading to more efficient defense systems. The duration suggests a long-term need for these specialized services. Contracting through open competition provides transparency and accountability.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of specific performance metrics makes it hard to gauge effectiveness.
  • Contract type (Time and Materials) can pose cost control risks if not managed diligently.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under full and open competition.
  • Contract supports critical acquisition and engineering functions.
  • Experienced contractor selected.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, which is crucial for government defense and aerospace initiatives. Spending benchmarks for such services can vary widely based on complexity, but $48.6 million over nearly four years is a significant but not unusual investment for specialized support.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses (sb: false). While large prime contractors often utilize small business subcontractors, this specific award does not directly benefit small businesses as prime recipients.

Oversight & Accountability

Awarded under full and open competition suggests a structured procurement process. Oversight would focus on performance monitoring, adherence to contract terms, and managing the Time and Materials aspects to ensure cost efficiency.

Related Government Programs

  • Engineering Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Contract type (Time and Materials) carries inherent cost risk.
  • Lack of specific performance metrics makes effectiveness assessment difficult.
  • Potential for contractor lock-in due to long duration.
  • No indication of small business participation as prime.

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, md, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $48.6 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC. ACQUISITION, ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING SUPPORT FOR AMCOM SAMD MSMB. ALSO, TO ADD EA 001.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $48.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-05-02. End: 2011-01-30.

What specific engineering and manufacturing support tasks are included in this contract, and how do they align with AMCOM SAMD MSMB's mission objectives?

The contract provides acquisition, engineering, and manufacturing support for AMCOM SAMD MSMB. This likely encompasses a range of activities such as systems engineering, technical support, program management assistance, and potentially manufacturing process improvements or oversight. The alignment with mission objectives would depend on the specific strategic goals of AMCOM SAMD MSMB, but generally, such support is critical for the lifecycle management and operational readiness of defense systems.

What are the primary risks associated with a Time and Materials contract for engineering services, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risk with Time and Materials (T&M) contracts is the potential for cost overruns, as the government pays for direct labor hours at specified rates and for the actual cost of materials. Mitigation strategies include establishing strong oversight, setting ceiling prices, defining labor categories and rates carefully, requiring detailed reporting, and implementing performance metrics to ensure efficiency and prevent scope creep. Regular reviews and audits are also crucial.

How does the duration of this contract (1369 days) impact the government's ability to adapt to evolving technological needs in engineering and manufacturing?

A contract duration of 1369 days (approximately 3.75 years) provides stability and allows for deep engagement with the contractor on complex, long-term projects. However, it also presents a risk of technological obsolescence if not managed proactively. The government must ensure contract flexibility through change order clauses and regular reviews to incorporate new technologies or adjust requirements as needed, preventing the contract from becoming a barrier to innovation.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)

Address: 2551 RIVA ROAD, ANNAPOLIS, MD, 21401

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $48,635,824

Exercised Options: $48,635,824

Current Obligation: $48,635,824

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DAAB0703DB006

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-05-02

Current End Date: 2011-01-30

Potential End Date: 2011-01-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2015-03-24

More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Engineering Services, LLC

View all Booz Allen Hamilton Engineering Services, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending