DoD Awards $50.6M for Aircraft Depot Repairs to DynCorp, Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $50,583,639 ($50.6M)

Contractor: Dyncorp Technical Services Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-08-20

End Date: 2008-09-30

Contract Duration: 407 days

Daily Burn Rate: $124.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Defense

Official Description: LABOR SERVICES TO ACCOMPLISH APPROVED DEPOT LEVEL CRASH/BATTLE REPAIRS ON ALL PLATFORMS AT OLR. 200612!001634!5700!FA8108!OC-ALC/LAD CFT !F3460197D0422 !A!N! !N!0184 !04 !20060925!20070831!608461898!003242013!009581091!N!DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC !13500 HERITAGE PKWY !FORT WORTH !TX!76177!28468!047!21!FORT CAMPBELL !CHRISTIAN !KENTUCKY !+000000084000!N!N!000000000000!J015!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL COMPS !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !336413!E! !5!B!M!C!A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!Y!2!004!B! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! !2100! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: FORT WORTH, TARRANT County, TEXAS, 76177

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $50.6 million to DYNCORP TECHNICAL SERVICES INC for work described as: LABOR SERVICES TO ACCOMPLISH APPROVED DEPOT LEVEL CRASH/BATTLE REPAIRS ON ALL PLATFORMS AT OLR. … Key points: 1. Significant contract value for specialized aircraft maintenance. 2. Full and open competition suggests a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. Risk of cost overruns inherent in time-and-materials contracts for depot-level repairs. 4. Defense sector spending focused on platform readiness and sustainment.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $50.6 million for depot-level repairs is substantial. Without specific benchmarks for similar platform repairs, it's difficult to definitively assess pricing, but the time-and-materials nature introduces potential for variability.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a broad solicitation for bids. This method generally promotes competitive pricing, but the time-and-materials pricing structure can still lead to costs exceeding initial estimates.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for critical defense asset maintenance, ensuring operational readiness. The competitive award aims for efficiency, but the contract type warrants monitoring for cost control.

Public Impact

Ensures readiness of critical military aircraft platforms. Supports specialized technical skills and labor within the defense industrial base. Potential for job creation in aircraft maintenance and repair sectors. Funds allocated to maintain aging but essential military equipment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost overruns.
  • Contract duration is relatively short, potentially impacting long-term planning.
  • No explicit mention of small business participation.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under full and open competition.
  • Addresses critical need for aircraft platform repairs.
  • Contract awarded to a known entity in defense services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the aerospace and defense manufacturing sector, specifically focusing on aircraft parts and auxiliary equipment manufacturing. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining military readiness and involves specialized labor and facilities.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this specific award (ss: false, sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if opportunities were missed or if the nature of the work precluded small business involvement.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), indicating established oversight mechanisms. However, the time-and-materials nature necessitates vigilant monitoring to ensure costs remain within reasonable bounds and deliverables are met.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Time and Materials pricing model.
  • Lack of small business participation.
  • Potential for cost overruns.
  • Specific repair outcomes not detailed.
  • Contract duration is limited.

Tags

other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, tx, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $50.6 million to DYNCORP TECHNICAL SERVICES INC. LABOR SERVICES TO ACCOMPLISH APPROVED DEPOT LEVEL CRASH/BATTLE REPAIRS ON ALL PLATFORMS AT OLR.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DYNCORP TECHNICAL SERVICES INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $50.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-08-20. End: 2008-09-30.

What is the historical cost performance of DynCorp Technical Services Inc. on similar time-and-materials contracts for depot-level aircraft repairs?

Assessing DynCorp's historical performance on similar contracts is crucial for evaluating the value proposition of this award. Past performance data, including cost overruns, schedule adherence, and quality of work on previous time-and-materials contracts for depot-level repairs, would provide a more informed basis for judging the potential effectiveness and financial prudence of this $50.6 million award.

How does the pricing structure of this time-and-materials contract compare to fixed-price or cost-plus-incentive-fee contracts for comparable aircraft repair services?

Time-and-materials contracts offer flexibility but can be susceptible to cost escalation. Comparing the estimated costs and potential final price of this contract against historical data for fixed-price or cost-plus-incentive-fee contracts for similar aircraft repairs would reveal whether the government is achieving competitive pricing and managing risk effectively. This comparison is key to understanding the overall value and potential taxpayer impact.

What specific metrics are in place to measure the effectiveness and efficiency of the depot-level crash/battle repairs performed under this contract?

Effectiveness and efficiency are paramount for defense spending. Understanding the key performance indicators (KPIs) and quality assurance measures tied to this contract is essential. This includes tracking repair turnaround times, defect rates, adherence to technical specifications, and overall platform availability post-repair, ensuring the $50.6 million investment directly contributes to military readiness.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENTMAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6500 WEST FWY STE 600, FORT WORTH, TX, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $50,583,639

Exercised Options: $50,583,639

Current Obligation: $50,583,639

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: F3460197D0422

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-08-20

Current End Date: 2008-09-30

Potential End Date: 2008-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2011-02-22

More Contracts from Dyncorp Technical Services Inc

View all Dyncorp Technical Services Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending