DoD's $43.8M contract for engineering services awarded to ARINC Engineering Services, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $43,838,448 ($43.8M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Engineering Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-09-28

End Date: 2010-06-30

Contract Duration: 1,371 days

Daily Burn Rate: $32.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 14

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200612!008954!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0703DB006 !A!N! !Y!0192 ! !20060928!20110129!075916762!075916762!101458586!N!ARINC ENGINEERING SERVICES, LL!2551 RIVA RD !ANNAPOLIS !MD!21401!01600!003!24!ANNAPOLIS !ANNE ARUNDEL !MARYLAND !+000003200000!N!N!000000000000!R414!SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!N!Y!2!014!B! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!Z!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: LINTHICUM HEIGHTS, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 21090, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $43.8 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC for work described as: 200612!008954!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0703DB006 !A!N! !Y!0192 ! !20060928!20110129!075916762!075916762!101458586!N!ARINC ENGINEERING SERVICES, LL!2551 RIVA RD !ANNAPOLIS !MD!21401!01600!003!24!ANNAPOLIS !ANNE… Key points: 1. Contract value of $43.8M over 4 years suggests a significant investment in specialized engineering support. 2. Full and open competition indicates a robust bidding process, potentially leading to better pricing. 3. The contract's duration and value may present performance risks if not managed effectively. 4. Engineering services are critical for maintaining complex defense systems, highlighting the contract's strategic importance. 5. This contract falls within the broader 'Engineering Services' sector, a key area for government support functions.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $43.8M over approximately 4 years averages to about $10.9M annually. Benchmarking this against similar large-scale engineering services contracts for the Department of Defense is challenging without more specific service details. However, the duration and scope suggest a substantial commitment. The pricing structure, identified as Time and Materials, can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored, which warrants a 'fair' assessment of value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' suggesting that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 14 bids indicates a healthy level of competition for this requirement. This broad competition is generally favorable for price discovery and ensures the government receives offers from a wide range of qualified contractors.

Taxpayer Impact: A high number of bidders in a full and open competition typically drives down prices, meaning taxpayers likely benefited from a more competitive bidding environment and potentially lower overall costs.

Public Impact

The Department of the Army benefits from specialized engineering services to support its operations. Services delivered likely include systems engineering, technical support, and potentially program management assistance. The contract's geographic impact is centered in Maryland, where the contractor is located. The contract supports a workforce skilled in engineering and technical fields within the defense sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost escalation if not managed stringently.
  • The significant contract value over a multi-year period requires robust oversight to ensure continued value.
  • Performance metrics and deliverables need to be clearly defined and monitored to ensure successful outcomes.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive process.
  • Multiple bidders (14) participated, suggesting a healthy market response.
  • The contract supports critical engineering services for the Department of the Army.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS code 541330), which encompasses firms providing specialized engineering expertise. The federal government is a major consumer of these services, particularly within the Department of Defense, for complex system design, integration, and maintenance. Comparable spending in this sector often involves large, multi-year contracts supporting defense acquisition and sustainment programs.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the contractor, ARINC Engineering Services, LLC, is likely a larger entity. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within this data. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears minimal unless subcontracting opportunities were pursued independently by the prime contractor.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be tied to the contract's performance work statement and delivery schedules. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reviews are often internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

  • Department of Defense Engineering Services Contracts
  • Army Systems Engineering Support
  • Information Technology and Electronics Support Contracts
  • Defense Acquisition Support Services

Risk Flags

  • Time and Materials contract type requires close monitoring to control costs.
  • Contract duration necessitates sustained performance management.
  • Scope definition is critical for T&M contracts to prevent scope creep.

Tags

defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, engineering-services, systems-engineering, time-and-materials, full-and-open-competition, maryland, large-contract, electronics-and-communication-equipment

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $43.8 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC. 200612!008954!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0703DB006 !A!N! !Y!0192 ! !20060928!20110129!075916762!075916762!101458586!N!ARINC ENGINEERING SERVICES, LL!2551 RIVA RD !ANNAPOLIS !MD!21401!01600!003!24!ANNAPOLIS !ANNE ARUNDEL !MARYLAND !+000003200000!N!N!000000000000!R414!SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $43.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-09-28. End: 2010-06-30.

What specific engineering services were provided under this contract?

The contract data indicates the primary service category as 'Systems Engineering Services' (PSC R414) and the NAICS code is 541330 for Engineering Services. While the specific tasks are not detailed in the provided data, 'Systems Engineering Services' typically involves the design, integration, and management of complex systems throughout their lifecycle. This could include activities such as requirements analysis, system architecture development, technical planning, risk management, and ensuring the interoperability and performance of various defense electronic and communication equipment.

How does the $43.8M contract value compare to similar engineering services contracts within the DoD?

The $43.8M contract value over approximately four years (September 2006 to June 2010) represents an average annual value of roughly $10.9M. This is a substantial amount, indicative of a significant engineering support requirement. However, without specific details on the scope, duration, and nature of services for comparable contracts, a direct comparison is difficult. Generally, large-scale engineering services for major defense programs can range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars, making this contract moderately large within the DoD's engineering services portfolio.

What are the potential risks associated with a Time and Materials contract of this size and duration?

Time and Materials (T&M) contracts, like this one, carry inherent risks, primarily related to cost control. Since the contractor is reimbursed for direct labor hours at specified rates and for the cost of materials, there is less incentive for efficiency compared to fixed-price contracts. For a contract valued at $43.8M over nearly four years, the primary risk is cost escalation if labor hours are not diligently monitored or if rates are not competitive. Effective oversight, clear task definitions, and robust reporting are crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure the government receives good value.

What does the 'full and open competition' with 14 bidders signify for the Department of the Army?

The 'full and open competition' award with 14 bidders signifies a highly competitive environment for this engineering services requirement. For the Department of the Army, this suggests that the solicitation was broadly advertised, allowing numerous qualified companies to compete. A large number of bidders typically leads to more competitive pricing, a wider selection of technical approaches, and a greater likelihood of selecting a contractor that offers the best value. It also indicates that the market has sufficient capacity to meet the Army's needs for these specialized services.

What is the historical spending trend for engineering services by the Department of the Army?

Historical spending on engineering services by the Department of the Army is substantial, reflecting the complexity and scale of its operations and acquisition programs. While specific historical data for this exact contract is limited to its award period (2006-2010), the Army consistently procures significant engineering support across various domains, including systems engineering, research and development, logistics, and infrastructure. Spending in this category often fluctuates based on defense budgets, modernization priorities, and the lifecycle stage of major weapon systems. The trend generally shows a sustained demand for specialized engineering expertise.

Could the contractor, ARINC Engineering Services, LLC, have a significant track record with the DoD?

Given that ARINC Engineering Services, LLC (now part of The ARINC Group, which was acquired by Rockwell Collins, and subsequently by Raytheon Technologies) was awarded a substantial $43.8M contract by the Department of the Army, it is highly probable they possessed a significant track record with the DoD. Companies undertaking contracts of this magnitude typically have established relationships, past performance data, and demonstrated capabilities relevant to defense requirements. Their involvement in systems engineering and electronics communication equipment suggests a specialization aligned with military needs, further supporting the likelihood of prior DoD engagement.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 14

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)

Address: 2551 RIVA ROAD, ANNAPOLIS, MD, 21401

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DAAB0703DB006

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2006-09-28

Current End Date: 2010-06-30

Potential End Date: 2010-06-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2015-03-30

More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Engineering Services, LLC

View all Booz Allen Hamilton Engineering Services, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending