DoD's $51M DynCorp contract for aircraft maintenance services awarded under full and open competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $51,009,464 ($51.0M)
Contractor: Dyncorp Technical Services Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-10-01
End Date: 2011-07-12
Contract Duration: 1,745 days
Daily Burn Rate: $29.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Defense
Official Description: LABOR SVCS TO PERFORM AIR TEST AND EVALUATION AOA INDIRECT/DIRECT MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
Place of Performance
Location: FORT WORTH, TARRANT County, TEXAS, 76177
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $51.0 million to DYNCORP TECHNICAL SERVICES INC for work described as: LABOR SVCS TO PERFORM AIR TEST AND EVALUATION AOA INDIRECT/DIRECT MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS Key points: 1. Contract awarded for labor services to perform air test and evaluation, and indirect/direct maintenance. 2. Significant duration of nearly 5 years indicates a substantial, ongoing need for these services. 3. The contract was awarded under a 'full and open competition' procurement method. 4. The contract type is 'Time and Materials', which can pose cost control challenges. 5. The contractor, DynCorp Technical Services Inc., has a notable presence in defense contracting. 6. The contract value of over $51 million suggests a large-scale service requirement. 7. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 336413 points to aircraft parts manufacturing, though services are the focus here.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $51,009,463.93 for nearly five years of service suggests a substantial investment. Without specific performance metrics or a detailed breakdown of labor categories and rates, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the 'Time and Materials' contract type, while flexible, can lead to higher costs if not closely managed, as it reimburses actual labor and material costs plus a fee. Benchmarking against similar large-scale aircraft maintenance contracts would be necessary for a more definitive value assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of 4 bids suggests a competitive environment, which generally benefits price discovery and can lead to more favorable pricing for the government. The specific details of the bidding process, such as the number of proposals received and the evaluation criteria, would provide further insight into the effectiveness of the competition.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally leads to better pricing for taxpayers by ensuring a wide range of potential contractors can compete, driving down costs through market forces.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense units requiring specialized air test, evaluation, and maintenance services for their aircraft. The services delivered are critical for ensuring the operational readiness and safety of military aircraft. The contract is geographically focused on Texas (ST: TX, SN: TEXAS), indicating a specific operational base or facility. This contract likely supports a workforce of skilled technicians, engineers, and support staff involved in aircraft maintenance and testing.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- The 'Time and Materials' contract type can lead to cost overruns if not meticulously monitored and controlled.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess the contractor's efficiency and effectiveness.
- The duration of the contract (nearly 5 years) represents a significant long-term financial commitment for the agency.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through 'full and open competition', suggesting a robust and fair bidding process.
- The contract value indicates a significant need and likely a high level of service quality expected from the contractor.
- The contractor, DynCorp Technical Services Inc., is a known entity in the defense services sector, implying experience and established capabilities.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the aerospace and defense services sector, specifically focusing on aircraft maintenance and support. The market for these services is substantial, driven by the ongoing needs of military branches for operational readiness. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) contracts awarded by the DoD and other government agencies for similar aircraft types and service scopes. The NAICS code 336413, while related to manufacturing, is often associated with firms that also provide extensive support and maintenance services.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (SB: false) and there is no explicit mention of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This suggests that the primary award went to a large business, and opportunities for small businesses would likely be through direct subcontracting by DynCorp, if they choose to engage them. The absence of a small business set-aside means that the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this specific contract award is likely minimal.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), as indicated by the 'sa' field. DCMA is responsible for ensuring contractor compliance with contract terms, quality standards, and delivery schedules. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.
Related Government Programs
- Aircraft Maintenance Services
- Defense Logistics Support
- Air Force Readiness Programs
- Aviation Support Contracts
- DoD Service Contracts
Risk Flags
- Time and Materials Contract Type
- Potential for Cost Overruns
- Limited Public Performance Data
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, aircraft-maintenance, labor-services, time-and-materials, full-and-open-competition, dyncorp-technical-services-inc, texas, large-contract, service-contract, aviation-support, defense-contract-management-agency
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $51.0 million to DYNCORP TECHNICAL SERVICES INC. LABOR SVCS TO PERFORM AIR TEST AND EVALUATION AOA INDIRECT/DIRECT MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DYNCORP TECHNICAL SERVICES INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $51.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-10-01. End: 2011-07-12.
What is the historical spending pattern for DynCorp Technical Services Inc. with the Department of Defense for similar aircraft maintenance services?
To assess DynCorp's historical spending, one would need to query federal procurement databases (like FPDS or USASpending) for all contracts awarded to DynCorp Technical Services Inc. by the Department of Defense. Filtering these results for contracts related to aircraft maintenance, air test, and evaluation services, and comparing the total value and duration of these past contracts against the current $51 million award would reveal trends. For instance, if DynCorp has consistently secured large-value, long-term maintenance contracts, it indicates a strong track record and established relationship. Conversely, a history of smaller, shorter-term contracts might suggest this is a significant expansion of their DoD business in this area. Analyzing the types of aircraft supported and the specific services rendered in past contracts would also provide context for the current award's scope and significance.
How does the per-hour labor rate for this contract compare to industry benchmarks for similar aircraft maintenance roles?
A detailed comparison of per-hour labor rates would require access to the specific labor categories, rates, and overhead applied within this 'Time and Materials' contract, which are not publicly detailed in the provided summary data. Assuming such data were available, the analysis would involve benchmarking these rates against industry surveys (e.g., from professional organizations or consulting firms) for comparable roles like aircraft mechanics, avionics technicians, and test engineers in the defense sector. Additionally, comparing these rates to those charged by other contractors on similar DoD contracts, especially those awarded through competitive processes, would be crucial. If DynCorp's rates are significantly higher than benchmarks or competitor rates without a clear justification (e.g., specialized skills, unique location), it could indicate potential value concerns. Conversely, rates at or below market averages would suggest favorable pricing.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this contract, and how has DynCorp performed against them?
The provided summary data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Typically, for aircraft maintenance and testing services, KPIs might include metrics such as aircraft availability rates, turnaround time for maintenance tasks, defect resolution rates, adherence to safety protocols, and compliance with technical specifications. To assess DynCorp's performance, one would need to consult contract performance reports, quality assurance reviews, or any available Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) data associated with this award. A review of these sources would reveal whether the contractor has consistently met or exceeded performance expectations, or if there have been issues related to quality, timeliness, or cost control. Without this performance data, a thorough assessment of the contract's effectiveness is limited.
What is the total historical spending by the DoD on aircraft maintenance and support services over the last five fiscal years?
To determine the total historical spending by the DoD on aircraft maintenance and support services over the last five fiscal years, one would need to access and analyze comprehensive federal spending databases such as the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or USAspending.gov. This analysis would involve querying for all contracts awarded by the Department of Defense that fall under relevant categories, such as specific Product Service Codes (PSCs) related to aircraft maintenance, repair, overhaul, and support, or relevant NAICS codes. Aggregating the total obligated amounts for these contracts across fiscal years (e.g., FY2019-FY2023) would provide the requested spending figure. This broader context helps in understanding the scale of the current $51 million contract relative to the overall DoD investment in maintaining its aviation fleet.
Are there any documented instances of contractor performance issues or disputes related to this specific contract or similar contracts held by DynCorp?
Assessing documented performance issues or disputes requires searching official government databases and records. The Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) is a primary source for evaluating past performance of contractors on federal contracts. Searching CPARS for DynCorp Technical Services Inc. and specifically for this contract (if it has a CPARS record) or similar aircraft maintenance contracts would reveal any documented concerns, such as quality deficiencies, schedule delays, or cost issues. Additionally, legal databases or news archives might contain information on significant contract disputes or litigation involving DynCorp. The absence of readily available negative performance data in these sources might suggest a satisfactory performance history, but a comprehensive review is necessary for a definitive conclusion.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 6500 WEST FWY STE 600, FORT WORTH, TX, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $52,602,207
Exercised Options: $52,602,207
Current Obligation: $51,009,464
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: F3460197D0422
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-10-01
Current End Date: 2011-07-12
Potential End Date: 2011-07-12 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-07-12
More Contracts from Dyncorp Technical Services Inc
- Federal Contract — $233.4M (Department of Defense)
- Labor Svcs to Perform AIR Test and Evaluation AOA Indirect/Direct Maintenance Requirements — $174.7M (Department of Defense)
- Maintenance and Modification of Nasa JSC Assigned Aircraft — $113.4M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- 200411!000709!5700!GD15 !oc-Alc/Lidac !F3460197D0422 !A!N! !N!0138 ! !20040823!20050823!608461898!003242013!009581091!n!dyncorp International LLC !6500 West Freeway, Suite 6!fort Worth !tx!76116!26736!027!48!fort Hood !bell !texas !+000036119625!n!n!000000000000!j016!maint & Repair of Eq/Aircraft Comps & Accys !a1c!other Aircraft Equipment !000 !* !336413!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!u!y!2!004!b! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y!2100! !0001! ! — $74.2M (Department of Defense)
- 200607!000750!5700!fa8108!oc-Alc/Lad CFT !F3460197D0422 !A!N! !N!0177 ! !20060206!20070205!608461898!003242013!009581091!n!dyncorp International LLC !13500 Heritage Parkway !fort Worth !tx!76177!26736!027!48!fort Hood !bell !texas !+000000300000!n!n!000000000000!j015!maint & Repair of Eq/Aircraft Structural Comps !a1c!other Aircraft Equipment !000 !NOT Discernable !336413!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!u!y!2!004!b! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y!2100! !0001! ! — $70.7M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)