DoD awards $60.8M contract for aircraft parts to DynCorp International, raising cost concerns

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $36,024,722 ($36.0M)

Contractor: Dyncorp Technical Services Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-09-30

End Date: 2011-03-01

Contract Duration: 1,978 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200511!001415!5700!FA8108!OC-ALC/LAD CFT !F3460197D0422 !A!N! !N!0165 ! !20050930!20060927!608461898!003242013!009581091!N!DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC !6500 WEST FWY STE 500 !FORT WORTH !TX!76116!60650!037!24!PATUXENT RIVER NAS !ST. MARY S !MARYLAND !+000002081038!N!N!000000000000!K020!MODIFICATION OF EQ/SHIP & MARINE EQUIPMENT !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT !000 !* !336413!E! !5!B!M! !A! !20200930!B! ! !A! !A!U!Y!2!004!B! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! !Y!1700! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: FORT WORTH, TARRANT County, TEXAS, 76116

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $36.0 million to DYNCORP TECHNICAL SERVICES INC for work described as: 200511!001415!5700!FA8108!OC-ALC/LAD CFT !F3460197D0422 !A!N! !N!0165 ! !20050930!20060927!608461898!003242013!009581091!N!DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC !6500 WEST FWY STE 500 !FORT WORTH !TX!76116!60650!037!24!PATUXENT RIVER NAS !ST. … Key points: 1. Contract awarded for 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing'. 2. DynCorp International LLC secured the award. 3. Significant contract value of $60.8 million. 4. Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $60.8 million appears high for the specified period, especially given the Time and Materials pricing structure which can lead to cost escalation. Benchmarking against similar contracts for aircraft parts is difficult without more detailed cost breakdowns.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. However, the Time and Materials (T&M) pricing mechanism may limit price discovery and could lead to higher costs than fixed-price contracts.

Taxpayer Impact: The T&M pricing structure presents a risk to taxpayers, as costs are not capped and could exceed initial estimates if not closely monitored.

Public Impact

Ensures continued availability of critical aircraft parts for military operations. Supports a large defense contractor, potentially impacting employment. Potential for increased defense spending due to T&M pricing.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Time and Materials pricing
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • Long contract duration

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition
  • Supports critical defense needs

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically related to aircraft parts manufacturing. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining military readiness, but efficiency and cost control are paramount.

Small Business Impact

No specific information is provided regarding small business participation in this contract. The prime contractor is a large business, and subcontracting opportunities for small businesses are not detailed.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract's oversight will be managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA). Robust oversight is crucial to manage the Time and Materials aspect and ensure fair pricing.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Time and Materials pricing structure
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • Lack of specific cost benchmarks
  • Long contract duration with multiple modifications

Tags

other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, tx, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $36.0 million to DYNCORP TECHNICAL SERVICES INC. 200511!001415!5700!FA8108!OC-ALC/LAD CFT !F3460197D0422 !A!N! !N!0165 ! !20050930!20060927!608461898!003242013!009581091!N!DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC !6500 WEST FWY STE 500 !FORT WORTH !TX!76116!60650!037!24!PATUXENT RIVER NAS !ST. MARY S !MARYLAND !+000002081038!N!N!000000000000!K020!MODIFICATION OF EQ/SHIP & MARINE EQUIPMENT !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT !000 !* !336413!E! !5!B!M! !A! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DYNCORP TECHNICAL SERVICES INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $36.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-09-30. End: 2011-03-01.

What specific aircraft parts are being procured under this contract, and how do their costs compare to industry standards?

The contract specifies 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' but lacks granular detail on the specific parts. Without this, a direct cost comparison to industry standards is challenging. The Time and Materials pricing model further complicates direct cost analysis, as the final cost depends on labor hours and material costs incurred, rather than a pre-defined unit price.

What measures are in place to mitigate the risk of cost overruns associated with the Time and Materials pricing structure?

Mitigation strategies for Time and Materials contracts typically involve strict monitoring of labor hours, material costs, and overhead rates by the contracting officer's representative (COR) and DCMA. Establishing clear ceiling prices, requiring detailed invoicing, and conducting regular audits are essential. The contract's duration and modification history may also indicate past cost control effectiveness.

How effectively does this contract ensure the timely and cost-efficient supply of essential aircraft components for the Department of Defense?

The contract's effectiveness hinges on the balance between ensuring supply and controlling costs. While full and open competition suggests a competitive award, the Time and Materials structure introduces inherent cost uncertainty. Effective oversight and diligent management by DCMA are critical to ensuring that the DoD receives necessary parts without undue financial burden, making its overall effectiveness contingent on execution.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MODIFICATION OF EQUIPMENTMODIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6500 WEST FWY STE 600, FORT WORTH, TX, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: F3460197D0422

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-09-30

Current End Date: 2011-03-01

Potential End Date: 2011-03-01 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2010-06-06

More Contracts from Dyncorp Technical Services Inc

View all Dyncorp Technical Services Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending