DoD Awards $21.3M Contract for Aircraft Parts to DynCorp International LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,272,928 ($21.3M)

Contractor: Dyncorp Technical Services Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2003-09-30

End Date: 2004-09-29

Contract Duration: 365 days

Daily Burn Rate: $58.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200312!000850!5700!GD15 !OC-ALC/LIDAC !F3460197D0422 !A!N! !N!0120 !20030930!20040929!608461898!003242013!009581091!N!DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC !6500 WEST FREEWAY, SUITE 6!FORT WORTH !TX!76116!27000!439!48!FORT WORTH !TARRANT !TEXAS !+000006119642!N!N!000000000000!K020!MODIFICATION OF EQ/SHIP & MARINE EQUIPMENT !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPME!3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !336413!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!Y!2!007!B! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! !Y!2100! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: SOLOMONS, CALVERT County, MARYLAND, 20688

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $21.3 million to DYNCORP TECHNICAL SERVICES INC for work described as: 200312!000850!5700!GD15 !OC-ALC/LIDAC !F3460197D0422 !A!N! !N!0120 !20030930!20040929!608461898!003242013!009581091!N!DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC !6500 WEST FREEWAY, SUITE 6!FORT WORTH !TX!76116!27000!439!48!FORT WORTH !TARRA… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $21.3 million, was awarded to DynCorp International LLC. 2. This award falls under the 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' NAICS code. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The duration of the contract is 365 days, with a start date of September 30, 2003, and an end date of September 29, 2004. 5. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can sometimes lead to higher costs if not managed closely.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $21.3 million for a 365-day period appears reasonable for specialized aircraft parts. However, without specific unit cost data or detailed scope of work, a precise benchmark is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayers are likely receiving a fair price for the goods and services procured.

Public Impact

Supports military readiness by providing essential aircraft parts. Contributes to the aerospace and defense sector's economic activity. Ensures the operational capability of Air Force aircraft through timely parts delivery. Potential for job creation within DynCorp International and its supply chain.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 58 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored.
  • Limited contract duration (1 year) may necessitate future re-competition or extensions.
  • Specific details on the 'Other Aircraft Parts' are not provided, making it hard to assess uniqueness.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under full and open competition.
  • Supports critical Department of Defense operations.
  • Established contractor with a significant contract award.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the aerospace and defense sector, specifically related to aircraft parts manufacturing and supply. Spending in this sector is crucial for national security and technological advancement, with significant government investment.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. The prime contractor, DynCorp International LLC, is a large business, suggesting that subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist but are not explicitly detailed in this award.

Oversight & Accountability

The award was made by the Department of the Air Force, a component of the Department of Defense, which has established oversight mechanisms for contract execution. However, the effectiveness of this oversight for this specific contract is not detailed.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

  • Time and Materials contract type.
  • Short contract duration (1 year).
  • Lack of specific itemization for parts procured.
  • No indication of small business subcontracting goals.
  • Potential for cost escalation without strict oversight.

Tags

other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, md, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $21.3 million to DYNCORP TECHNICAL SERVICES INC. 200312!000850!5700!GD15 !OC-ALC/LIDAC !F3460197D0422 !A!N! !N!0120 !20030930!20040929!608461898!003242013!009581091!N!DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC !6500 WEST FREEWAY, SUITE 6!FORT WORTH !TX!76116!27000!439!48!FORT WORTH !TARRANT !TEXAS !+000006119642!N!N!000000000000!K020!MODIFICATION OF EQ/SHIP & MARINE EQUIPMENT !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPME!3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !336413!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DYNCORP TECHNICAL SERVICES INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $21.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-09-30. End: 2004-09-29.

What specific types of aircraft parts were procured under this contract, and how do their costs compare to industry standards?

The contract broadly covers 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' (NAICS 336413). Without a detailed breakdown of the specific parts, it is impossible to compare their costs against industry standards. The 'Time and Materials' contract type suggests flexibility but also requires diligent tracking of labor hours and material costs to ensure value for money.

What were the key evaluation criteria used in the full and open competition, and how did DynCorp International LLC's proposal meet them?

The provided data does not specify the evaluation criteria for this contract. Typically, full and open competition involves evaluating factors such as technical approach, past performance, price, and small business utilization. DynCorp International LLC's success suggests their proposal met or exceeded the government's requirements in these areas.

What is the potential impact of the 'Time and Materials' contract type on the final cost compared to a fixed-price contract for similar aircraft parts?

A 'Time and Materials' (T&M) contract, like this one, allows the government to pay for direct labor hours at specified rates and for the actual cost of materials. This can be more expensive than a fixed-price contract if costs are not well-controlled or if the scope of work expands significantly. However, T&M contracts offer flexibility when the scope is not clearly defined upfront.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MODIFICATION OF EQUIPMENTMODIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6500 WEST FWY STE 600, FORT WORTH, TX, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: F3460197D0422

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2003-09-30

Current End Date: 2004-09-29

Potential End Date: 2004-09-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2009-10-01

More Contracts from Dyncorp Technical Services Inc

View all Dyncorp Technical Services Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending