Naval Air Warfare Center contract for ADP & Telecommunication Services awarded to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC for over $10.7M
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,757,358 ($10.8M)
Contractor: KBR Wyle Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2004-12-23
End Date: 2008-03-31
Contract Duration: 1,194 days
Daily Burn Rate: $9.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: IT
Official Description: 200503!067841!1700!N68936!NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER !N6893602D0027 !A!N! !Y!0104 ! !20041223!20070930!004482378!116187758!001381284!N!ADVANCED INFORMATION ENGINEERI!4455 GENESEE STREET !BUFFALO !NY!14225!60704!029!06!RIDGECREST !KERN !CALIFORNIA!+000011127050!N!N!000000000000!D399!OTHER ADP & TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541519!E! !5!B!S! ! !D!20050930!B!F!N!A! !A!N!R!2!004!B! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! !Y!1719!N60530!0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: RIDGECREST, KERN County, CALIFORNIA, 93555
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $10.8 million to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC for work described as: 200503!067841!1700!N68936!NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER !N6893602D0027 !A!N! !Y!0104 ! !20041223!20070930!004482378!116187758!001381284!N!ADVANCED INFORMATION ENGINEERI!4455 GENESEE STREET !BUFFALO !NY!14225!60704!029!06!RIDGECREST !KERN… Key points: 1. Contract value of $10.7M for ADP and telecommunication services. 2. Awarded to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC, a significant player in government contracting. 3. Contract duration of approximately 3 years and 10 months. 4. Procured under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 5. The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee, which incentivizes performance. 6. The primary place of performance is Ridgecrest, California.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $10.7M for ADP and telecommunication services appears reasonable given the duration of nearly four years. Benchmarking against similar contracts for IT and telecommunication support services within the Department of Defense would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The Cost Plus Award Fee structure suggests an expectation of good performance, with potential for contractor incentives.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The data shows 4 bids were received, suggesting a healthy level of competition for this requirement. A competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition likely resulted in a more competitive pricing structure, benefiting taxpayers by ensuring the government received value for its investment.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary is the Department of the Navy, receiving essential ADP and telecommunication services. Services delivered likely include support for advanced information engineering and related technological infrastructure. The geographic impact is centered around the Naval Air Warfare Center's operations, with a primary performance location in Ridgecrest, California. Workforce implications may include specialized IT and telecommunications personnel employed by the contractor.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns inherent in Cost Plus Award Fee contracts if not managed diligently.
- Dependence on a single contractor (KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC) for critical ADP and telecommunication services.
- The specific nature of 'ADVANCED INFORMATION ENGINEERI' services could be complex to monitor and evaluate.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
- Cost Plus Award Fee structure provides incentives for contractor performance and efficiency.
- Contractor KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC has a track record in government contracting, suggesting experience.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Information Technology and Telecommunications sector, specifically focusing on ADP and related services. The market for such services is vast and highly competitive, with numerous large and small businesses offering solutions. The Department of Defense is a major consumer of these services, utilizing them to maintain its complex operational and administrative infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other IT service contracts awarded by the Navy or DoD.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a set-aside provision. However, the prime contractor, KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC, may engage small businesses as subcontractors, depending on their own subcontracting plans and the nature of the services required.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Naval Air Warfare Center's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are built into the Cost Plus Award Fee structure, which allows for adjustments based on performance. Transparency is generally maintained through contract reporting mechanisms, and while specific IG jurisdiction isn't detailed here, the Inspector General's office would have oversight over potential fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Naval Air Warfare Center Contracts
- ADP Services
- Telecommunication Services
- Information Technology Support
- Department of Defense IT Spending
- Cost Plus Award Fee Contracts
Risk Flags
- Contract duration may be long for rapidly evolving IT services.
- Cost Plus Award Fee contracts require diligent oversight to manage costs effectively.
- Potential for contractor performance to impact critical Naval operations.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, naval-air-warfare-center, it-services, telecommunication-services, cost-plus-award-fee, full-and-open-competition, california, large-contract, professional-services, information-technology
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $10.8 million to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC. 200503!067841!1700!N68936!NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER !N6893602D0027 !A!N! !Y!0104 ! !20041223!20070930!004482378!116187758!001381284!N!ADVANCED INFORMATION ENGINEERI!4455 GENESEE STREET !BUFFALO !NY!14225!60704!029!06!RIDGECREST !KERN !CALIFORNIA!+000011127050!N!N!000000000000!D399!OTHER ADP & TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541519!E! !5!B!S! ! !D!200
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-12-23. End: 2008-03-31.
What is the historical spending pattern for ADP and telecommunication services by the Naval Air Warfare Center?
Analyzing historical spending for ADP and telecommunication services by the Naval Air Warfare Center (NAWC) requires access to detailed procurement data over multiple fiscal years. While this specific contract represents a $10.7M award over approximately 3.75 years, understanding the broader pattern involves looking at the total obligated amounts for similar service categories awarded by NAWC annually. Trends might reveal an increasing or decreasing reliance on outsourced IT services, shifts in technology focus (e.g., from traditional ADP to cloud services), and the average contract values and durations. Without a broader dataset, it's difficult to establish a definitive historical pattern, but this contract indicates a significant investment in these capabilities during its award period.
How does the awarded amount of $10.7M compare to similar contracts for ADP and telecommunication services within the Department of Defense?
To compare the $10.7M award to similar contracts, one would need to identify other Department of Defense (DoD) contracts for ADP and telecommunication services awarded around the same period (2004-2008) with comparable scopes and durations. Factors like the specific services (e.g., network management, software development, hardware maintenance), the complexity of the requirement, and the location of performance all influence pricing. A contract of this value for nearly four years suggests a substantial requirement. If other similar contracts were in the $2-3M range annually, this $10.7M figure might be considered on the higher end, potentially reflecting specialized needs or a broader scope of services. Conversely, if other large-scale IT support contracts within the DoD were in the multi-million dollar range annually, this contract would be more in line with market rates for significant support.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) typically associated with Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contracts for IT services?
For CPAF contracts in IT services, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are crucial for determining award fees. Common KPIs often include system uptime and availability, response times for service requests (e.g., help desk tickets), successful completion of project milestones, adherence to security protocols, and user satisfaction ratings. For ADP and telecommunication services, specific metrics might involve network latency, data transfer speeds, successful implementation of upgrades or new systems, and the efficiency of technical support. The government establishes baseline targets for these KPIs, and the contractor's performance against these targets directly influences the 'award fee' portion of the contract, incentivizing them to exceed expectations.
What is the track record of KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC in performing similar government contracts?
KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC, and its predecessor entities, have a substantial track record in performing government contracts, particularly within the defense and aerospace sectors. They have historically been involved in a wide range of services, including engineering, technical support, logistics, and IT services for various military branches. For contracts similar to this one (ADP and telecommunication services), their experience would likely encompass managing complex IT infrastructures, providing specialized technical support, and potentially developing or maintaining software systems. A review of their past performance ratings, any past performance issues or commendations, and the types of agencies they have served would provide a comprehensive understanding of their capabilities and reliability in executing such requirements.
What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source or limited competition award for IT services?
This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' so the risks associated with sole-source or limited competition are not directly applicable here. However, if it *had* been limited or sole-source, potential risks would include higher prices due to lack of competitive pressure, reduced innovation as the contractor may face less incentive to improve services, and a potential lack of flexibility if the contractor's offerings become misaligned with evolving government needs. There's also a risk of vendor lock-in, making it difficult and costly to switch providers. For IT services, where technology evolves rapidly, limited competition could mean the government is slower to adopt newer, more efficient, or secure solutions.
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Wyle Services Corporation (UEI: 963281881)
Address: 7800 HWY 20 W., HUNTSVILLE, AL, 05
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N6893602D0027
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-12-23
Current End Date: 2008-03-31
Potential End Date: 2008-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-05-01
More Contracts from KBR Wyle Services, LLC
- Bioastronautics Contract-Activities for the Health &productivity of Crews Working and Living in Space — $1.5B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Fpds-Ng Mission Systems Operations Contract (msoc) — $1.0B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Acquire Engineering Services and Related Services to MSD and Related Organizations Throughout Gsfc, AS Required, for the Formulation, Design, Development, Fabrication, Integration, Testing, Verification, and Operations of Space Flight and Ground System Hardware and Software, Including Development and Validation of NEW Technologies to Enable Future Space and Science Missions. the Engineering Areas of Emphasis ARE Multidisciplinary With Concentration in the Mechanical Engineering Areas of Materials, Structural Analysis and Loads, Mechanical Design, Electromechanical Design, Thermal, Contamination and Coatings, Manufacturing and Integration and Test — $728.5M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- 200106!000121!1700!F7004 !marine Corps Logistics Base !M6700499C0002 !a!n!*!n!p00015 !20010228!20080930!041014242!041014242!139691877!n!honeywell Technology Solutions!7000 Columbia Gateway Driv!columbia !md!21046!35000!031!12!jacksonville !duval !florida !+000004292865!n!n!000000000000!j049!maint & Repair of Eq/Maintenance & Repair Shop EQ !a4a!combat Vehicles !2000!NOT Discernable or Classified !811310!*!*!3! ! !C!*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !A !N!J!2!006!B! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!d!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $670.1M (Department of Defense)
- Mission Operations Management Services (moms) — $623.8M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)