DoD Awards $74M+ for Operational Training Devices, Primarily to Science Applications International
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $74,194,304 ($74.2M)
Contractor: Leidos Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-04-07
End Date: 2012-03-31
Contract Duration: 2,550 days
Daily Burn Rate: $29.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: IT
Official Description: 200507!197705!1700!N61339!NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER !N6133900D0710 !A!N! !N!0039 ! !20050407!20070930!054781240!054781240!054781240!N!SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATI!10260 CAMPUS POINT DR !SAN DIEGO !CA!92121!53000!095!12!ORLANDO !ORANGE !FLORIDA !+000003117603!N!N!000000000000!6930!OPERATIONAL TRAINING DEVICES !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT !000 !* !541990!E! !5!B!M! !A! !20200930!B! ! !A! !A!U!U!2!001!A! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!C!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! !2100!W32G11!0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: ORLANDO, ORANGE County, FLORIDA, 32826
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $74.2 million to LEIDOS INC for work described as: 200507!197705!1700!N61339!NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER !N6133900D0710 !A!N! !N!0039 ! !20050407!20070930!054781240!054781240!054781240!N!SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATI!10260 CAMPUS POINT DR !SAN DIEGO !CA!92121!53000!095!12!ORLANDO !ORAN… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at over $74 million, was awarded to Science Applications International (SAIC) for operational training devices. 2. Leidos Inc. is listed as the ultimate parent company, indicating potential consolidation or acquisition within the defense sector. 3. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The primary sector is IT/Professional Services, with a focus on training and simulation technologies.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $74.2 million over its period of performance appears reasonable for specialized operational training devices, though a direct per-unit cost is not provided.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically leads to better price discovery and value for the government. The use of a delivery order suggests a flexible approach to fulfilling specific needs.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is positive for taxpayers, as it likely resulted in a more favorable price than a sole-source or limited competition scenario.
Public Impact
Enhances military readiness through advanced training simulations. Supports technological development in the defense training sector. Potential for job creation within the defense contracting industry.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Contract duration is lengthy (over 10 years), potentially leading to scope creep or evolving technology needs.
- Lack of specific per-unit cost data makes detailed value assessment challenging.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Supports critical defense training requirements.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services sector, specifically focusing on defense-related training and simulation. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining military readiness and technological superiority.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. The primary awardee, Science Applications International, is a large business, suggesting limited direct benefit to small businesses through this specific contract vehicle.
Oversight & Accountability
The award was managed by the Naval Air Warfare Center, part of the Department of the Navy, under the Department of Defense. Standard oversight mechanisms for defense contracts would apply.
Related Government Programs
- All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may lead to technology obsolescence.
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure can increase government risk.
- Lack of detailed per-unit cost data hinders precise value analysis.
- Potential for contractor lock-in due to specialized nature of training devices.
Tags
all-other-professional-scientific-and-te, department-of-defense, fl, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $74.2 million to LEIDOS INC. 200507!197705!1700!N61339!NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER !N6133900D0710 !A!N! !N!0039 ! !20050407!20070930!054781240!054781240!054781240!N!SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATI!10260 CAMPUS POINT DR !SAN DIEGO !CA!92121!53000!095!12!ORLANDO !ORANGE !FLORIDA !+000003117603!N!N!000000000000!6930!OPERATIONAL TRAINING DEVICES !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT !000 !* !541990!E! !5!B!M! !A! !202
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $74.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-04-07. End: 2012-03-31.
What specific types of operational training devices are being procured, and how do they align with current military training needs?
The contract specifies 'OPERATIONAL TRAINING DEVICES' without further detail. These likely encompass a range of simulation and training equipment essential for air warfare, potentially including flight simulators, virtual reality training systems, or tactical scenario generators. Their alignment with current needs would depend on specific naval aviation training doctrine and evolving threats.
Given the long contract duration, what mechanisms are in place to ensure the technology remains relevant and cost-effective over time?
While the contract period is extensive, the use of delivery orders allows for flexibility. However, specific clauses regarding technology refresh, performance reviews, and potential contract modifications would be crucial for ensuring relevance and cost-effectiveness. Without these details, there's a risk of the procured devices becoming obsolete or overpriced.
How does the pricing structure (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) compare to industry benchmarks for similar training device contracts?
Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contracts are common in R&D and complex services where costs are uncertain. While providing flexibility, they can incentivize cost overruns. Benchmarking CPFF contracts for training devices is challenging without detailed cost breakdowns, but it generally carries higher risk for the government compared to fixed-price contracts if not managed diligently.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Product/Service Code: TRAINING AIDS AND DEVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Address: 11951 FREEDOM DR, RESTON, VA, 20190
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N6133900D0710
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-04-07
Current End Date: 2012-03-31
Potential End Date: 2012-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2023-08-09
More Contracts from Leidos Inc
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)