Army Awards $22.2M Logistics Support Contract to Eagle Group International
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $22,199,973 ($22.2M)
Contractor: Eagle Group International LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2002-03-26
End Date: 2008-02-29
Contract Duration: 2,166 days
Daily Burn Rate: $10.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 12
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200207!000282!2100!KF11 !ARMY ATLANTA CONTRACTING CENTER !DAKF1199D0008 !A!N! !N!0032 !20020326!20030228!926881327!926881327!926881327!N!EAGLE GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC!4751 BEST ROAD !ATLANTA !GA!30337!30928!121!13!FORT MCPHERSON !FULTON !GEORGIA !+000001635975!N!N!000000000000!R706!LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541614!E! !5!B!M! !A!A!20030228!B! ! !A! !A!N!U!2!010!K! !C!N!Z! ! !N!A!N!N!C! ! ! !D!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001!
Place of Performance
Location: ATLANTA, FULTON County, GEORGIA, 30330
State: Georgia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $22.2 million to EAGLE GROUP INTERNATIONAL LLC for work described as: 200207!000282!2100!KF11 !ARMY ATLANTA CONTRACTING CENTER !DAKF1199D0008 !A!N! !N!0032 !20020326!20030228!926881327!926881327!926881327!N!EAGLE GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC!4751 BEST ROAD !ATLANTA !GA!30337!30928!121!13!FORT MCPHERSON !FULTO… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $22,199,973.13, was awarded to Eagle Group International, Inc. 2. This award falls under the 'Logistics Support Services' category, with a Product Service Code of R706. 3. The contract was awarded using 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources', indicating a specific procurement process. 4. The contract duration is 2166 days, spanning from March 26, 2002, to February 29, 2008. 5. The contract type is 'Cost Plus Fixed Fee', which can present cost control challenges.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $22.2 million over approximately 6 years suggests a moderate annual spend. Without specific benchmarks for similar logistics support services contracts, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. However, the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure warrants scrutiny for potential cost overruns.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The procurement method 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' implies that while competition was sought, certain sources were excluded, potentially limiting the breadth of competition and impacting price discovery. This method requires justification.
Taxpayer Impact: The total value of $22.2 million represents taxpayer funds allocated to logistics support. The effectiveness of the competition method and the cost control inherent in the contract type will influence the ultimate value for taxpayers.
Public Impact
Ensures continued logistics support for Army operations, contributing to mission readiness. Supports a private company, Eagle Group International, Inc., and its employees. The contract's duration suggests a long-term need for these services. The specific nature of 'logistics support services' can range from supply chain management to equipment maintenance.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can lead to higher costs if not managed closely.
- Limited competition method requires careful review to ensure fair pricing.
- Lack of detailed information on the specific services provided.
Positive Signals
- Awarded to a specific company, indicating a successful bid.
- Contract duration suggests a stable and ongoing requirement.
- Procurement process, though limited, was followed.
Sector Analysis
Logistics support services are crucial for military operations, encompassing a wide range of activities from supply chain management to maintenance. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on operational tempo and equipment modernization. Benchmarks are difficult without more specific service details.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication in the provided data whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or partners in this contract. Further investigation would be needed to determine small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'Cost Plus Fixed Fee' contract type necessitates robust oversight to manage costs and ensure the contractor delivers services effectively and efficiently. The contracting agency, Department of the Army, is responsible for monitoring performance and expenditures.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type.
- Limited competition method.
- Lack of detailed service description.
- Potential for cost overruns without strong oversight.
Tags
department-of-defense, ga, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $22.2 million to EAGLE GROUP INTERNATIONAL LLC. 200207!000282!2100!KF11 !ARMY ATLANTA CONTRACTING CENTER !DAKF1199D0008 !A!N! !N!0032 !20020326!20030228!926881327!926881327!926881327!N!EAGLE GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC!4751 BEST ROAD !ATLANTA !GA!30337!30928!121!13!FORT MCPHERSON !FULTON !GEORGIA !+000001635975!N!N!000000000000!R706!LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541614!E! !5!B!M! !A!A!20030228!B
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is EAGLE GROUP INTERNATIONAL LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $22.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2002-03-26. End: 2008-02-29.
What specific logistics support services were included in this contract, and how do they align with current Army needs?
The data categorizes the service as 'LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES' (PSC R706) but lacks granular detail. Understanding the precise nature of these services, such as supply chain management, transportation, maintenance, or warehousing, is crucial for assessing their current relevance and effectiveness. Without this specificity, it's difficult to determine if the contracted services directly address evolving operational requirements or if they represent legacy support functions.
What was the justification for excluding other sources in the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' procurement method?
The procurement method 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' implies that while competition was intended, specific sources were deliberately excluded. Understanding the rationale behind these exclusions is vital for assessing the fairness and competitiveness of the process. Typical justifications might include specialized capabilities, existing infrastructure, or national security concerns, but without explicit documentation, it raises questions about potential limitations on achieving the best value for the government.
How effectively were costs managed under the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure for this contract?
The CPFF contract type allows the contractor to recover all allowable costs plus a predetermined fixed fee, which is their profit. While providing flexibility, it can incentivize cost overruns if not rigorously overseen. Assessing the effectiveness of cost management requires examining the final contract cost against the initial estimate, any incurred cost growth, and the efficiency of the oversight mechanisms employed by the Army Contracting Command to control expenditures and ensure value.
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 12
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Lockheed Martin Corp (UEI: 834951691)
Address: 4751 BEST RD STE 300, ATLANTA, GA, 30337
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: DAKF1199D0008
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2002-03-26
Current End Date: 2008-02-29
Potential End Date: 2008-02-29 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2018-11-21
More Contracts from Eagle Group International LLC
- 200407!000475!2100!w911se!aca, South Region Contracting Ct!dakf1199d0008 !A!N! !N!0052 ! !20040327!20040924!926881327!926881327!926881327!n!eagle Group International, INC!4751 Best Road !atlanta !ga!30337!31068!029!13!fort Stewart !bryan !georgia !+000005000000!n!n!000000000000!j023!maint & Repair of Eq/Vehicles-Trailers-Cycles !a4a!combat Vehicles !000 !* !811118!E! !5!B!M! !A!A!20040924!B! ! !A! !a!n!u!2!010!b! !Z!N!Z! ! !n!a!n!n!c! ! ! !A!A!00 !A!B!N! ! ! !y!2100!aflg01!0001! ! — $138.2M (Department of Defense)
- TAS::21 2020::TAS 200607!600422!2100!w911se!aca, South Region Contracting Ct!gs10f0397n !C!N! !n!w911se06f0052! !20060329!20070228!926881327!926881327!926881327!n!eagle Group International, LLC!4751 Best RD STE 300 !atlanta !ga!30337!38964!179!13!hinesville !liberty !georgia !+000012190235!n!n!000000000000!j023!maint&repair of Eq/Vehicles-Trailers-Cycles !a4a!combat Vehicles !000 !* !811118!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !B!N! ! ! ! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !2100!W911SE!0001! ! — $107.5M (Department of Defense)
- Operation of JOB Corps Center — $80.1M (Department of Labor)
- Operation of Regional Training Site - Medical — $52.8M (Department of Defense)
- 200208!000414!2100!KF11 !army Atlanta Contracting Center !dakf1199d0008 !A!N! !N!003301 !20020415!20030228!926881327!926881327!926881327!n!eagle Group International, INC!4751 Best Road !atlanta !ga!30337!30928!121!13!fort Mcpherson !fulton !georgia !+000001813975!n!n!000000000000!r706!logistics Support Services !S1 !services !1000!NOT Discernable or Classified !541614!E! !5!b!m!b!a!a!20030228!b! ! !A! !a!n!u!2!010!k! !C!N!Z! ! !n!a!n!n!c! ! ! !d!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! — $49.6M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)