Army Awards $923M for Software Engineering Support to Science Applications International Corp

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $922,864,971 ($922.9M)

Contractor: Science Applications International Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-09-30

End Date: 2014-09-14

Contract Duration: 1,810 days

Daily Burn Rate: $509.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: SYSTEMS AND COMPUTER RESOURCES SUPPORT (SCRS) FOR THE SOFTWARE ENGINEERING DIRECTORATE (SED), U.S. ARMY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING COMMAND (USA RDECOM)

Place of Performance

Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $922.9 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION for work described as: SYSTEMS AND COMPUTER RESOURCES SUPPORT (SCRS) FOR THE SOFTWARE ENGINEERING DIRECTORATE (SED), U.S. ARMY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING COMMAND (USA RDECOM) Key points: 1. Significant contract value for R&D support services. 2. Competition was full and open, indicating market engagement. 3. Risk appears moderate given the contract duration and fixed-price nature. 4. Sector is Research and Development, a key area for defense innovation.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $923M over approximately 5 years suggests a substantial investment. Benchmarking against similar R&D support contracts would be necessary for a precise assessment, but the scale indicates a significant, potentially competitive, pricing environment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which generally promotes competitive pricing and allows for a broad range of potential contractors to bid. This method is expected to yield fair market prices.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for critical R&D support, aiming for technological advancement. The competitive award process is designed to ensure value for money.

Public Impact

Supports critical software engineering for Army research and development. Contract duration of nearly 5 years implies long-term need for these services. Award to a single vendor, Science Applications International Corporation, for a significant sum. Funding allocated for advanced research and engineering capabilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Long contract duration could lead to scope creep or price escalation if not managed.
  • Reliance on a single vendor for a large portion of R&D support.
  • Potential for vendor lock-in if follow-on contracts are not competitively bid.

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process.
  • Firm Fixed Price contract type helps control costs.
  • Award supports a critical R&D function for the Army.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on software engineering for the Army. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining technological superiority and innovation, with benchmarks varying widely based on project scope and complexity.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses (sb: false). While this specific award may not directly benefit SMBs, the overall R&D ecosystem often involves subcontracting opportunities.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically involve program management reviews, performance metrics tracking, and financial audits to ensure the contractor meets requirements and stays within budget. The Department of the Army is responsible for this oversight.

Related Government Programs

  • Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Contract awarded to a single large business.
  • Long contract duration.
  • Potential for vendor lock-in.
  • No specific small business set-aside mentioned.

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $922.9 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION. SYSTEMS AND COMPUTER RESOURCES SUPPORT (SCRS) FOR THE SOFTWARE ENGINEERING DIRECTORATE (SED), U.S. ARMY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING COMMAND (USA RDECOM)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $922.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-09-30. End: 2014-09-14.

What specific software engineering capabilities are being procured, and how do they align with current Army modernization priorities?

The contract supports the Software Engineering Directorate (SED) for the U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command (RDECOM). This likely includes a broad range of services such as software design, development, testing, integration, and maintenance for various Army systems and platforms. Alignment with modernization priorities would depend on the specific projects undertaken by SED, which could range from AI/ML integration to cybersecurity enhancements and advanced simulation tools.

Given the $923M value and 5-year duration, what are the primary risks associated with vendor performance and cost control?

Primary risks include potential cost overruns if the Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract doesn't adequately account for unforeseen technical challenges or scope changes. Vendor performance risk involves ensuring SAIC delivers high-quality software on time and meets evolving technical requirements. There's also a risk of knowledge transfer limitations if SAIC's personnel turnover is high, potentially impacting long-term sustainment and future development efforts.

How effectively does this contract leverage competition to ensure optimal value for taxpayer investment in R&D?

The contract's 'full and open competition' award method is a strong indicator of efforts to achieve optimal value. This process allows multiple qualified vendors to compete, driving down prices and encouraging innovation. However, the true effectiveness depends on the clarity of the Statement of Work, the rigor of the evaluation criteria, and the government's ability to manage the contract to prevent scope creep and ensure deliverables meet the intended R&D objectives.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1710 SAIC DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $924,816,123

Exercised Options: $922,864,971

Current Obligation: $922,864,971

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W31P4Q05A0031

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2009-09-30

Current End Date: 2014-09-14

Potential End Date: 2014-09-14 12:09:00

Last Modified: 2024-05-03

More Contracts from Science Applications International Corporation

View all Science Applications International Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending