DoD's $10.2M Engineering Services Contract Awarded to OVC-Engineered Solutions LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,193,988 ($10.2M)

Contractor: Ovc-Engineered Solutions LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-01-23

End Date: 2009-07-02

Contract Duration: 891 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY)

Sector: Defense

Official Description: ENGINEERING SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, HARFORD County, MARYLAND, 21005, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.2 million to OVC-ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS LLC for work described as: ENGINEERING SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive process with specific justifications. 2. The contract duration of 891 days suggests a medium-term engagement for engineering services. 3. The award was made to OVC-Engineered Solutions LLC, a specific contractor for these services. 4. The contract falls under the Engineering Services NAICS code (541330). 5. The award type 'Combination' suggests it might encompass multiple aspects of service delivery. 6. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount of $10.2 million for engineering services over approximately 2.5 years needs further benchmarking against similar contracts to assess value for money. Without specific deliverables or performance metrics, it is difficult to definitively assess the value. The contract's duration and scope will heavily influence its overall value proposition. Comparisons to industry standards for engineering services of this nature would be necessary for a more robust assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES'. This indicates that while the intent was competition, specific circumstances led to the exclusion of certain sources. The number of bidders is not explicitly stated, but the 'limited' competition label suggests fewer than a full and open competition where all potential sources are considered without restriction. This approach can sometimes lead to less competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may not have received the benefit of the broadest possible competition, potentially resulting in a higher price than if all qualified vendors had been allowed to bid without exclusion.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Department of the Army, receiving essential engineering services. The services delivered are categorized under 'Engineering Services', likely supporting military infrastructure, projects, or operational needs. The geographic impact is specified as Maryland (MD), indicating the primary location of service performance or the contracting office. Workforce implications would involve the employment of engineers and technical staff by OVC-Engineered Solutions LLC.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition type raises questions about the breadth of competition and potential cost implications for taxpayers.
Lack of detailed performance metrics or deliverables makes it challenging to assess the effectiveness and value of the engineering services provided.
The specific nature of the engineering services is not detailed, limiting the ability to understand the full scope and impact.

Positive Signals

The contract was awarded to a specific entity, OVC-Engineered Solutions LLC, suggesting a focused selection process.
The award falls under the broad category of Engineering Services, a critical function for defense operations.
The contract was managed by the Department of the Army, a major component of the Department of Defense.

Sector Analysis

Engineering services are a critical component of the defense sector, supporting infrastructure development, maintenance, and specialized project needs. The market for these services is substantial, with government contracts forming a significant portion. This contract fits within the broader landscape of defense procurement for technical expertise. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other engineering service contracts awarded by the DoD or similar agencies for projects of similar scale and complexity.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a set-aside provision. The focus of this award is on the prime contractor, OVC-Engineered Solutions LLC.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be tied to the terms and conditions of the contract, including performance standards and payment schedules. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, where award details are published. Inspector General jurisdiction may apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Engineering Contracts
Army Corps of Engineers Services
Professional Services Contracts
Infrastructure Support Services

Risk Flags

Limited competition due to source exclusion
Lack of detailed service description
Potential for cost overruns on long-duration contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.2 million to OVC-ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS LLC. ENGINEERING SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is OVC-ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-01-23. End: 2009-07-02.

What specific types of engineering services were procured under this contract, and what were the key deliverables?

The contract is broadly categorized under 'Engineering Services' (NAICS 541330). However, the specific types of services and key deliverables are not detailed in the provided data. Typically, engineering services for the Department of the Army could range from architectural and design services for facilities, civil engineering for infrastructure projects, mechanical and electrical engineering for systems, to specialized technical consulting. Without further documentation, the exact nature of the work, such as designing new military installations, upgrading existing systems, or providing technical assessments, remains unspecified. Understanding these details is crucial for evaluating the contract's purpose and effectiveness.

How does the $10.2 million award amount compare to similar engineering services contracts awarded by the Department of the Army or DoD?

Benchmarking the $10.2 million award requires comparing it to contracts with similar scope, duration, and service types. For instance, if this contract was for a large-scale infrastructure design, $10.2 million might represent a fair or even low cost. Conversely, if it was for a more limited scope of consulting, it could be on the higher end. A comprehensive analysis would involve querying databases for engineering services contracts awarded within the last few years by the Department of the Army or DoD, filtering by relevant NAICS codes and service descriptions, and then comparing award values and contract durations. Without this comparative data, assessing the value-for-money aspect of this specific $10.2 million award is speculative.

What are the potential risks associated with a 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' award type?

The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' award type suggests that while the agency intended to compete the contract broadly, certain sources were excluded for specific, documented reasons. Potential risks include a reduced pool of qualified bidders, which could lead to less competitive pricing and potentially limit the availability of innovative solutions. It may also raise concerns about fairness and transparency if the exclusion criteria are not clearly justified or perceived as arbitrary. This approach requires careful justification to ensure it serves the government's best interest and does not unduly restrict competition, potentially leading to higher costs or suboptimal contractor selection.

What is the track record of OVC-Engineered Solutions LLC in performing government contracts, particularly within the Department of Defense?

Information regarding the track record of OVC-Engineered Solutions LLC is not provided in the data snippet. A thorough assessment would require examining the company's past performance on federal contracts, including their history with the Department of Defense. This would involve looking at factors such as on-time delivery, quality of work, adherence to budget, and any past performance issues or awards. A positive track record would indicate a lower risk for this contract, while a history of problems could signal potential challenges. Accessing the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) or similar databases would be necessary to evaluate their performance history.

What are the implications of the contract's duration (891 days) on project management and potential cost overruns?

A contract duration of 891 days (approximately 2.5 years) is a significant period for engineering services. This extended duration allows for complex projects to be undertaken and provides stability for the contractor. However, it also increases the risk of cost overruns due to potential changes in market conditions, labor costs, or unforeseen project complexities that may arise over time. Effective project management, including robust change control processes and regular performance reviews, is crucial to mitigate these risks. The longer timeframe also necessitates sustained oversight to ensure continued value and adherence to original objectives.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY) (2)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Sotera Defense Solutions Inc (UEI: 048010532)

Address: 28712 GLEBE RD, EASTON, MD, 21601

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,193,988

Exercised Options: $10,193,988

Current Obligation: $10,193,988

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W91CRB06D0054

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline