Navy Awards $79.3M Construction Contract for Hawaii Facilities to Healy Tibbitts Builders Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,195,603 ($14.2M)

Contractor: Healy Tibbitts Builders, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-03-24

End Date: 2008-02-12

Contract Duration: 690 days

Daily Burn Rate: $20.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: 200608!001570!1700!N62478!NAVAL FACILITIES HAWAII !N6274204D1300 !A!N! !N!0011 ! !20060324!20071016!792984882!044649119!044665230!N!HEALY TIBBITTS BUILDERS INC !99-994 IWAENA ST STE A !AIEA !HI!96701!63500!003!15!PRL HRBR NSC !HONOLULU !HAWAII !+000010977540!N!N!000000000000!Y299!ALL OTHER NON-BUILDING FACILITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !237990!A!B!5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !N!Z!A!Y!J!2!003!B! !D!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !Z!Z!A!A!000!A!B!Y! !N! ! !1700!N00604!0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: PEARL HARBOR, HONOLULU County, HAWAII, 96860

State: Hawaii Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.2 million to HEALY TIBBITTS BUILDERS, INC. for work described as: 200608!001570!1700!N62478!NAVAL FACILITIES HAWAII !N6274204D1300 !A!N! !N!0011 ! !20060324!20071016!792984882!044649119!044665230!N!HEALY TIBBITTS BUILDERS INC !99-994 IWAENA ST STE A !AIEA !HI!96701!63500!003!15!PRL HRBR NSC !HONO… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $79,298,488, was awarded to Healy Tibbitts Builders, Inc. for construction services. 2. This award represents a significant investment in naval infrastructure in Hawaii. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The sector is Construction, specifically 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction'.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $79.3 million appears reasonable for a large-scale construction project of this nature, especially considering the location in Hawaii which often incurs higher costs.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayer funds are being used efficiently, with the price likely driven down by market forces.

Public Impact

Local economic impact through job creation and material sourcing in Hawaii. Improved naval facilities could enhance operational readiness and support for military personnel. Potential for follow-on contracts or related infrastructure development in the region.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns in construction projects, especially in remote or challenging environments.
Dependence on a single contractor for a large project could pose risks if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
Fixed-price contract type can provide cost certainty for the government.
Experienced contractor with a history of government contracts.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Construction sector, specifically 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction'. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining and upgrading critical infrastructure, with benchmarks varying widely based on project scope and location.

Small Business Impact

While the primary awardee is a larger entity, the project may offer subcontracting opportunities for small businesses in areas such as specialized labor, material supply, or support services.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of Defense and Department of the Navy are responsible for oversight. Contract performance will be monitored to ensure adherence to specifications, timelines, and budget, with mechanisms for accountability in place.

Related Government Programs

Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep leading to increased costs.
Geographical challenges in Hawaii impacting logistics and material costs.
Reliance on a single prime contractor for a large, multi-faceted project.
Environmental considerations and permitting processes in Hawaii.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.2 million to HEALY TIBBITTS BUILDERS, INC.. 200608!001570!1700!N62478!NAVAL FACILITIES HAWAII !N6274204D1300 !A!N! !N!0011 ! !20060324!20071016!792984882!044649119!044665230!N!HEALY TIBBITTS BUILDERS INC !99-994 IWAENA ST STE A !AIEA !HI!96701!63500!003!15!PRL HRBR NSC !HONOLULU !HAWAII !+000010977540!N!N!000000000000!Y299!ALL OTHER NON-BUILDING FACILITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !237990!A!B!5!B!S! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HEALY TIBBITTS BUILDERS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-03-24. End: 2008-02-12.

What specific types of facilities are included in this construction project, and how do they align with current naval operational needs?

The data indicates the contract covers 'ALL OTHER NON-BUILDING FACILITIES' and falls under 'CONSTRUCTION'. While specific details are not provided, this likely includes infrastructure like roads, utilities, piers, or specialized outdoor operational areas. The alignment with naval needs would depend on the Navy's strategic priorities for its Hawaii installations, such as modernization, expansion, or repair of existing critical infrastructure to support fleet readiness and personnel.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) being used to measure the success of this construction contract, and what are the potential risks if these are not met?

Key performance indicators for construction contracts typically include on-time completion, adherence to budget, quality of work meeting specifications, and safety compliance. Risks of not meeting these KPIs could include project delays impacting naval operations, cost overruns requiring additional funding, subpar construction quality leading to future repair needs, and safety incidents resulting in injuries or work stoppages. The government has recourse through contract clauses for non-performance.

How does the awarded price of $79.3 million compare to similar large-scale civil engineering construction projects in the Pacific region, considering material and labor costs?

Benchmarking this price requires detailed analysis of similar projects in the Pacific region, factoring in specific scope, complexity, and prevailing labor/material costs, which are often higher in Hawaii. Given the 'full and open competition' award, it suggests the price was deemed competitive. However, a detailed cost-benefit analysis against regional benchmarks would be necessary for a definitive assessment of value for money.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCT NONBUILDING FACILITIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Weeks Marine Inc (UEI: 044665230)

Address: 99-994 IWAENA STREET, AIEA, HI, 96701

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6274204D1300

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline