DoD's $148M Aviation and Missile Command Contract for Engineering Services Awarded to Science Applications International
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $54,193,023 ($54.2M)
Contractor: Leidos, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-06-29
End Date: 2009-12-31
Contract Duration: 1,646 days
Daily Burn Rate: $32.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: 200509!003821!2100!W31P4Q!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W31P4Q05A0031 !A!N! !Y!0005 ! !20050629!20051231!148095086!148095086!054781240!N!SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATI!10260 CAMPUS POINT DR !SAN DIEGO !CA!92121!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADISON !ALABAMA !+000000065276!N!N!000000000000!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541710!E! !7! ! ! ! ! !20200930!C! ! !N!Z!A!N!J!2!006! ! !Z!N!Z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !D!D!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35898, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $54.2 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: 200509!003821!2100!W31P4Q!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W31P4Q05A0031 !A!N! !Y!0005 ! !20050629!20051231!148095086!148095086!054781240!N!SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATI!10260 CAMPUS POINT DR !SAN DIEGO !CA!92121!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADI… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for Engineering Technical Services to Science Applications International. 2. Significant value of $148,095,086 over a period of 1646 days. 3. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The sector is R&D, specifically Research and Development in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $148,095,086 for engineering technical services appears reasonable given the duration and scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale R&D contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes price discovery and can lead to more competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayers likely received fair value for the services rendered, though a detailed cost analysis would be needed for definitive confirmation.
Public Impact
Supports critical research and development for the US Army Aviation and Missile Command. Ensures continued technological advancement in aviation and missile systems. Potential for job creation and economic activity in Alabama and California. Impacts national security through advanced defense capabilities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Contract duration is long (1646 days), potentially leading to scope creep or evolving requirements.
- Reliance on a single vendor for critical engineering services could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
- Contract supports a vital area of national defense (aviation and missile technology).
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on engineering technical services for aviation and missile systems. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining technological superiority in defense.
Small Business Impact
The data does not explicitly indicate the extent of small business participation in this contract. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would typically be managed by the Department of the Army, ensuring that Science Applications International meets the contract's technical and performance requirements. Regular reporting and milestone reviews are standard oversight mechanisms.
Related Government Programs
- Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may increase risk of cost overruns or scope creep.
- Potential for vendor lock-in if services are highly specialized.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical R&D functions.
- Lack of explicit small business participation data.
Tags
research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, al, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $54.2 million to LEIDOS, INC.. 200509!003821!2100!W31P4Q!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W31P4Q05A0031 !A!N! !Y!0005 ! !20050629!20051231!148095086!148095086!054781240!N!SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATI!10260 CAMPUS POINT DR !SAN DIEGO !CA!92121!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADISON !ALABAMA !+000000065276!N!N!000000000000!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541710!E! !7! ! ! ! ! !202
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $54.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-06-29. End: 2009-12-31.
What specific engineering technical services are included in this contract, and how do they align with current Army modernization priorities?
The contract specifies 'ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES' under NAICS code 541710 (Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences). While the exact services aren't detailed in this snippet, they likely encompass design, analysis, testing, and integration support for aviation and missile systems. Alignment with modernization priorities would depend on the specific projects undertaken, but such contracts generally support the development of next-generation capabilities.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and what are the penalties or remedies for non-performance?
Specific KPIs and performance penalties are not detailed in the provided data. Typically, large R&D contracts include metrics related to technical milestones, delivery schedules, quality standards, and budget adherence. Remedies for non-performance can range from contract termination to financial penalties, depending on the severity of the breach and the contract's terms.
How does the $148 million contract value compare to similar R&D engineering services contracts awarded by the Department of Defense in the past five years?
The $148 million value for a multi-year R&D engineering services contract is substantial but not unprecedented within the Department of Defense. Benchmarking against similar contracts for aviation and missile system development would reveal if this represents a competitive price point. Factors like contract duration, scope complexity, and vendor capabilities significantly influence pricing, making direct comparisons challenging without detailed context.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)
Address: 10260 CAMPUS POINT DR, SAN DIEGO, CA, 92121
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W31P4Q05A0031
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-06-29
Current End Date: 2009-12-31
Potential End Date: 2009-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2016-02-16
More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)