DoD's $23.7M Security Services Contract Awarded to Southeastern Protective Services Inc. for Multiple Air Force Bases

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,772,872 ($23.8M)

Contractor: Southeastern Protective Services, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-10-01

End Date: 2011-09-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $65.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 13

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PROVIDE SECURITY FORCES SUPPORT SERVICES FOR ANDREWS AFB, MD, BARKSDALE AFB, LA, BOLLING AFB, DC, HANSCOM AFB, MA, SEYMOUR-JOHNSON AFB, NC, SHAW AFB, SC, AND WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB, OH, LAKEHURST NJ, UNDER JOINT BASE MCGUIRE-DIX-LAKEHURST, FT EUSTIS, VA UNDER JOINT BASE LANGLEY-FT EUSTIS.

Place of Performance

Location: LACKLAND AFB, BEXAR County, TEXAS, 78236

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $23.8 million to SOUTHEASTERN PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC for work described as: PROVIDE SECURITY FORCES SUPPORT SERVICES FOR ANDREWS AFB, MD, BARKSDALE AFB, LA, BOLLING AFB, DC, HANSCOM AFB, MA, SEYMOUR-JOHNSON AFB, NC, SHAW AFB, SC, AND WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB, OH, LAKEHURST NJ, UNDER JOINT BASE MCGUIRE-DIX-LAKEHURST, FT EUSTIS, VA UNDER JOINT BASE LANGLEY-FT … Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $23.7 million, was awarded to Southeastern Protective Services, Inc. for security guard and patrol services. 2. The award was made under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration was 364 days, suggesting a short-term need for these services. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561612 points to the security guards and patrol services sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's value of $23.7 million for one year of security services across multiple bases appears to be within a reasonable range for such a large-scale operation. However, without specific per-base or per-service benchmarks, a precise pricing assessment is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES.' This suggests that while the competition was open, certain sources may have been excluded prior to the main bidding process, potentially impacting the breadth of price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests efforts to secure fair pricing, but the exclusion of sources warrants further scrutiny to ensure optimal taxpayer value.

Public Impact

Ensures security and safety at multiple critical Air Force installations across the US. Supports the operational readiness of the Air Force by providing essential security personnel. The contract's value represents a significant allocation of taxpayer funds towards defense infrastructure. The services provided are crucial for maintaining order and preventing unauthorized access to sensitive military sites.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential impact of 'exclusion of sources' on competition and pricing.
Lack of detailed cost breakdown makes it hard to assess value for money.
Short contract duration might lead to higher per-unit costs due to contractor mobilization/demobilization.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process.
Services are critical for national security and base operations.
Contract awarded to a single entity for consolidated service delivery.

Sector Analysis

The security guards and patrol services sector (NAICS 561612) is a significant part of the broader security and investigation services industry. Spending in this sector for government contracts can vary widely based on the scope and duration of services required, with large-scale base support contracts representing a substantial portion.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business (sb: false). Therefore, there is no direct benefit to small businesses from this specific award, and it does not contribute to small business contracting goals.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Air Force, a component of the Department of Defense. Oversight would typically involve contract officers and base security commands to ensure service delivery meets requirements and stays within budget.

Related Government Programs

Security Guards and Patrol Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for reduced competition due to source exclusion.
Lack of detailed cost breakdown for value assessment.
Short contract duration may not reflect long-term strategic needs.
No small business participation noted.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $23.8 million to SOUTHEASTERN PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC. PROVIDE SECURITY FORCES SUPPORT SERVICES FOR ANDREWS AFB, MD, BARKSDALE AFB, LA, BOLLING AFB, DC, HANSCOM AFB, MA, SEYMOUR-JOHNSON AFB, NC, SHAW AFB, SC, AND WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB, OH, LAKEHURST NJ, UNDER JOINT BASE MCGUIRE-DIX-LAKEHURST, FT EUSTIS, VA UNDER JOINT BASE LANGLEY-FT EUSTIS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SOUTHEASTERN PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-10-01. End: 2011-09-30.

What was the rationale for excluding certain sources prior to the 'full and open competition' phase, and how did this impact the final contract price?

The rationale for excluding sources prior to full and open competition is not detailed in the provided data. Such exclusions can occur for various reasons, including past performance, specific security clearances, or unique capabilities. However, limiting the pool of potential bidders could potentially reduce competition, possibly leading to a higher final contract price than if all qualified vendors had been allowed to compete.

How does the per-unit cost of these security services compare to similar contracts awarded by other branches of the military or federal agencies for comparable services?

A direct comparison of per-unit costs is challenging without more granular data on the specific services rendered (e.g., number of guards, hours, specific security measures) and the geographic locations' cost-of-living adjustments. However, the total contract value of $23.7 million for one year across multiple bases suggests a significant investment. Benchmarking against similar large-scale base security contracts would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment.

What mechanisms were in place to ensure the effectiveness and quality of the security services provided by Southeastern Protective Services, Inc. throughout the contract period?

Effectiveness and quality are typically ensured through performance standards outlined in the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS). The Air Force would likely have contract officers and technical representatives monitoring service delivery, conducting regular inspections, and reviewing performance metrics. Any deficiencies would be addressed through contract modifications, corrective action requests, or potential penalties as stipulated in the contract terms.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: FA300207R0001

Offers Received: 13

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1062 BOBBY BUTLER, CHESTER, SC, 05

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $23,772,872

Exercised Options: $23,772,872

Current Obligation: $23,772,872

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA300207D0022

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline