DoD's $29.7M Security Contract Awarded to Southeastern Protective Services Faces Scrutiny
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $29,766,550 ($29.8M)
Contractor: Southeastern Protective Services, Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-10-01
End Date: 2010-09-30
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $81.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 13
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: SSECURITY FORCES SUPPORT SERVICES FOR ANDREWS AFB, MD, BARKSDALE AFB, LA, BOLLING AFB, DC, HANSCOM AFB, MA, KEESLER AFB, MS, LITTLE ROCK AFB, AR, MAXWELL AFB, AL, MOODY AFB, GA, PATRICK AFB, FL, SEYMOUR-JOHNSON AFB, NC, SHAW AFB, SC, TYNDALL AFB, FL, AND WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB, OH, LAKEHURST NJ.
Place of Performance
Location: LACKLAND AFB, BEXAR County, TEXAS, 78236
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $29.8 million to SOUTHEASTERN PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC for work described as: SSECURITY FORCES SUPPORT SERVICES FOR ANDREWS AFB, MD, BARKSDALE AFB, LA, BOLLING AFB, DC, HANSCOM AFB, MA, KEESLER AFB, MS, LITTLE ROCK AFB, AR, MAXWELL AFB, AL, MOODY AFB, GA, PATRICK AFB, FL, SEYMOUR-JOHNSON AFB, NC, SHAW AFB, SC, TYNDALL AFB, FL, AND WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB, OH,… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Southeastern Protective Services, Inc. for security guard services across multiple Air Force bases. 2. The contract value is $29,766,550.48, with a duration of 364 days. 3. Competition method was 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES', raising questions about true market reach. 4. The primary sector is IT/Defense, specifically security services for military installations.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract's pricing of $29.7M for one year of security services across 13 bases appears high without detailed cost breakdowns. Benchmarking against similar large-scale security contracts is difficult due to the specific nature of military base security requirements.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The competition method 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' suggests that while the initial solicitation was open, specific sources were later excluded. This limits the competitive landscape and may have impacted price discovery, potentially leading to a less optimal price for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition and potential for a non-optimal price could result in taxpayers paying more than necessary for essential security services.
Public Impact
Ensures security at 13 critical Air Force installations, maintaining operational readiness. Supports national defense by safeguarding military personnel and assets. The contract's structure and limited competition may set a precedent for future security service procurements. Potential for cost savings if competition were broader and more transparent.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition raises concerns about price fairness.
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown hinders value assessment.
- Exclusion of sources in a full and open competition is unusual.
Positive Signals
- Provides essential security services to multiple vital military installations.
- Contract awarded to a single entity, potentially streamlining management.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically focusing on security services. Spending benchmarks for security guards at military installations can vary significantly based on location, threat level, and specific service requirements. The $29.7M for a year across 13 bases suggests a substantial investment in base security.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded to Southeastern Protective Services, Inc., a firm located in Texas. There is no indication that this contract specifically benefited small businesses, as the awardee is not listed as a small business, and the contract was not set aside for small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' method warrants further oversight to ensure the exclusion of sources was justified and did not unduly restrict competition. Transparency in the pricing and performance metrics is crucial for accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Security Guards and Patrol Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition may have inflated costs.
- Lack of transparency in source exclusion.
- Potential for non-optimal price discovery.
- High contract value requires rigorous performance monitoring.
Tags
security-guards-and-patrol-services, department-of-defense, tx, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $29.8 million to SOUTHEASTERN PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC. SSECURITY FORCES SUPPORT SERVICES FOR ANDREWS AFB, MD, BARKSDALE AFB, LA, BOLLING AFB, DC, HANSCOM AFB, MA, KEESLER AFB, MS, LITTLE ROCK AFB, AR, MAXWELL AFB, AL, MOODY AFB, GA, PATRICK AFB, FL, SEYMOUR-JOHNSON AFB, NC, SHAW AFB, SC, TYNDALL AFB, FL, AND WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB, OH, LAKEHURST NJ.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SOUTHEASTERN PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $29.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-10-01. End: 2010-09-30.
What was the justification for excluding specific sources after initiating a full and open competition, and how did this impact the final price?
The justification for excluding sources after initiating a full and open competition needs to be thoroughly documented and reviewed. Typically, such exclusions are based on specific technical requirements, past performance issues, or other pre-defined criteria. Without this justification, it's difficult to assess if the exclusion was legitimate or if it artificially limited competition, potentially leading to a higher price than could have been achieved through broader market participation.
How does the per-unit cost of security services under this contract compare to industry benchmarks for similar military installations?
A direct comparison of per-unit costs is challenging without detailed service level agreements and specific site requirements. However, the overall contract value of $29.7M for 364 days across 13 bases suggests a significant investment. Benchmarking would require analyzing the number of guards, hours, specific security technologies deployed, and the threat profile of each base to determine if the pricing is competitive.
What measures are in place to ensure the effectiveness and accountability of Southeastern Protective Services in fulfilling its security obligations across all 13 bases?
Effectiveness and accountability are typically ensured through performance work statements (PWS), key performance indicators (KPIs), regular site inspections, and performance reviews. The Department of the Air Force would be responsible for monitoring guard performance, response times, incident reporting, and overall adherence to the contract's security protocols. Contract clauses for remedies in case of non-performance are also standard.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: FA300207R0001
Offers Received: 13
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1062 BOBBY BUTLER, CHESTER, SC, 05
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $29,766,550
Exercised Options: $29,766,550
Current Obligation: $29,766,550
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA300207D0022
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-10-01
Current End Date: 2010-09-30
Potential End Date: 2010-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-02-04
More Contracts from Southeastern Protective Services, Inc
- Security Forces Support Services for Region 1: Andrews AFB MD, Barksdale AFB LA, Bolling AFB DC, Hanscom AFB MA, Little Rock AFB LA, Maxwell AFB AL, Moody AFB GA, Patrick AFB FL, Seymour Johnson AFB NC, Shaw AFB SC, Tyndall AFB FL, & Wright Patterson AFB OH — $29.9M (Department of Defense)
- Provide Security Forces Support Services for Andrews AFB, MD, Barksdale AFB, LA, Bolling AFB, DC, Hanscom AFB, MA, Seymour-Johnson AFB, NC, Shaw AFB, SC, and Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, Lakehurst NJ, Under Joint Base Mcguire-Dix-Lakehurst, FT Eustis, VA Under Joint Base Langley-Ft Eustis — $23.8M (Department of Defense)
- Region 1 Security Support Services for 15 Conus AIR Force Installations — $23.4M (Department of Defense)
View all Southeastern Protective Services, Inc federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)