DoD Awards $13.7M for USAFA Academic Facility Upgrade to John Bowman, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,727,168 ($13.7M)
Contractor: John Bowman, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-09-04
End Date: 2010-02-15
Contract Duration: 529 days
Daily Burn Rate: $25.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: M-UPGRADE ACADEMIC FACILITY, USAFA
Place of Performance
Location: USAF ACADEMY, EL PASO County, COLORADO, 80840
State: Colorado Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $13.7 million to JOHN BOWMAN, INC. for work described as: M-UPGRADE ACADEMIC FACILITY, USAFA Key points: 1. Contract awarded for facility construction at the US Air Force Academy. 2. Competition method was 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources'. 3. The contract value is $13.7 million. 4. The sector is Industrial Building Construction.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $13.7M for a 529-day duration appears within a reasonable range for academic facility construction. However, without specific details on the scope of work and comparable projects, a precise pricing assessment is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The competition method 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources' suggests that while the competition was intended to be broad, specific criteria may have limited the pool of eligible bidders. This could impact price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for facility upgrades at a federal service academy. The effectiveness of the competition method in securing the best value for taxpayers is a key consideration.
Public Impact
Upgrade of academic facilities at a US Air Force Academy. Investment in infrastructure for military education and training. Potential impact on student learning environment and research capabilities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Competition method could limit price discovery.
- Lack of detailed scope of work for precise value assessment.
Positive Signals
- Investment in critical educational infrastructure.
- Awarded to a single contractor, potentially streamlining project management.
Sector Analysis
Industrial Building Construction is a broad sector. For academic facilities, costs can vary significantly based on size, complexity, and specific requirements. Benchmarks for similar projects would provide better context.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded to John Bowman, Inc. There is no indication that small businesses were involved as prime contractors or significant subcontractors in this award.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would typically be managed by the Department of the Army, ensuring adherence to contract terms, quality standards, and timely completion of the academic facility upgrade.
Related Government Programs
- Industrial Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition due to source exclusion.
- Potential for price inflation due to restricted bidder pool.
- Lack of detailed scope for precise value analysis.
- No clear indication of small business participation.
Tags
industrial-building-construction, department-of-defense, co, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $13.7 million to JOHN BOWMAN, INC.. M-UPGRADE ACADEMIC FACILITY, USAFA
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is JOHN BOWMAN, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-09-04. End: 2010-02-15.
What specific academic functions or improvements does this upgrade entail, and how do they align with the Air Force Academy's strategic goals?
The data does not specify the exact academic functions or improvements. This upgrade likely aims to modernize classrooms, laboratories, or study areas to enhance the learning environment and support advanced research and training for cadets. Alignment with strategic goals would require further information on the Academy's current needs and future educational priorities.
How did the 'Exclusion of Sources' in the competition process impact the final contract price and the range of potential solutions considered?
The 'Exclusion of Sources' suggests that certain types of firms or capabilities were deliberately not considered, potentially narrowing the competitive field. While the remaining pool was 'Full and Open,' this exclusion could have limited price competition and the exploration of innovative solutions from excluded entities, potentially leading to a higher-than-optimal price.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will the success of the facility upgrade be measured?
Key performance indicators for this contract would likely include adherence to the construction schedule, quality of workmanship, compliance with building codes and safety regulations, and final project cost. Success measurement would involve post-construction inspections, user feedback from academy staff and students, and verification that the upgraded facilities meet the intended functional requirements.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Industrial Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 967 E FILLMORE ST, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO, 05
Business Categories: Category Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $13,727,168
Exercised Options: $13,727,168
Current Obligation: $13,727,168
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W9128F07D0001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-09-04
Current End Date: 2010-02-15
Potential End Date: 2010-02-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2009-10-08
More Contracts from John Bowman, Inc.
- M - Upgrade Academic Facility Phase 5 — $16.4M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)