DoD's $18.4M contract for textile products awarded to GMA Cover Corp. with 2 bidders

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,455,400 ($18.5M)

Contractor: GMA Cover Corp.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-12-18

End Date: 2008-09-27

Contract Duration: 284 days

Daily Burn Rate: $65.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ULCANS - SLIN 0003AA

Place of Performance

Location: PORT HURON, ST. CLAIR County, MICHIGAN, 48060

State: Michigan Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $18.5 million to GMA COVER CORP. for work described as: ULCANS - SLIN 0003AA Key points: 1. Value appears reasonable given the limited competition and fixed-price nature. 2. Competition was full and open, but only two bids were received, suggesting potential market limitations. 3. Risk indicators are low due to the fixed-price contract and short duration. 4. Performance context is limited by the lack of detailed delivery information. 5. This contract falls within the miscellaneous textile product manufacturing sector. 6. The award amount is a significant portion of the total contract value for this specific SLIN.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $18.4 million for textile products seems within a reasonable range, especially considering it was a firm-fixed-price award. Benchmarking against similar contracts is difficult without more specific product details, but the presence of only two bidders might suggest that the market for this particular item is not highly competitive. The price appears to be a result of the bidding process, which, while limited, did involve competition.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, which is the preferred method for ensuring the widest possible access to the marketplace. However, only two bids were received. This limited number of bidders could indicate a specialized market, high barriers to entry, or that other potential contractors were not interested or aware of the opportunity. The limited competition may have had some impact on price discovery, potentially leading to a higher price than if more bids had been submitted.

Taxpayer Impact: While full and open competition was utilized, the low number of bids means taxpayers may not have benefited from the most aggressive pricing possible. The government secured a supplier, but the potential for cost savings through broader competition was not fully realized.

Public Impact

The Department of the Army is the primary beneficiary, receiving the specified textile products. The contract delivers miscellaneous textile products, likely for military use. The geographic impact is primarily associated with the contractor's location in Michigan. Workforce implications are likely concentrated within the winning contractor's facilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited number of bidders may indicate a less competitive market, potentially impacting long-term pricing.
Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the contractor's efficiency and effectiveness.
The specific nature of the 'miscellaneous textile products' is not detailed, hindering a precise understanding of the delivered goods.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, adhering to best practices for government procurement.
Firm-fixed-price contract type helps control costs and provides budget certainty.
Short contract duration reduces long-term financial commitment and allows for reassessment of needs.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Miscellaneous Textile Product Mills sector (NAICS 314999). This sector encompasses establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing textile products, excluding those specifically classified elsewhere like apparel or carpets. The market size for specialized military textile products can vary significantly, but this award represents a substantial single procurement within this niche. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish without more granular data on the specific textile items procured.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a primary focus for this contract, as the 'sb' field is false and the 'ss' field is also false. There is no indication of a small business set-aside. Therefore, the impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal, with no specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mandated by this award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price structure, which obligates the contractor to deliver specified goods at an agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of contract award data, although specific performance details may be less accessible.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Procurement
Textile Manufacturing Contracts
Army Logistics Support
Miscellaneous Goods Procurement

Risk Flags

Limited Competition
Unspecified Product Details

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $18.5 million to GMA COVER CORP.. ULCANS - SLIN 0003AA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GMA COVER CORP..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-12-18. End: 2008-09-27.

What specific types of 'Miscellaneous Textile Products' were procured under this contract?

The provided data identifies the product category as 'All Other Miscellaneous Textile Product Mills' (NAICS 314999) and references SLIN 0003AA. However, the exact nature of the textile products is not specified in the abbreviated data. These could range from durable covers, specialized fabrics, protective gear components, or other non-apparel textile items. Without further documentation, such as the Statement of Work or product specifications, the precise nature of the goods remains undefined. This lack of specificity can make it challenging to conduct detailed value analysis or compare this contract to others.

How does the awarded price of $18.4 million compare to similar contracts for textile products within the DoD?

Direct comparison of the $18.4 million award to similar DoD contracts for textile products is challenging without knowing the exact specifications of the items procured. The 'Miscellaneous Textile Product Mills' category is broad. If these were standard items like basic fabric rolls, the price might be high. If they are highly specialized, custom-manufactured items with unique material requirements or performance characteristics, the price could be justified. The limited competition (2 bidders) also suggests a potentially niche market, which can influence pricing. Further analysis would require detailed product specifications and a broader market survey of comparable procurements.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how were they mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract are relatively low due to its nature. Potential risks could include contractor performance issues (delivery delays, quality defects) or cost overruns if it were not a fixed-price contract. However, the firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type significantly mitigates cost overrun risk for the government. The short duration (284 days) also limits the government's long-term exposure. Mitigation for performance risks would rely on the Army's contract administration and quality assurance processes, which are standard oversight mechanisms. The limited competition might pose a risk of suboptimal pricing, but this is inherent in the market conditions.

What is the track record of GMA Cover Corp. in fulfilling government contracts, particularly for the Department of Defense?

Information on GMA Cover Corp.'s specific track record with government contracts, especially for the Department of Defense, is not detailed in the provided data snippet. To assess their reliability, one would need to examine their past performance history, including on-time delivery rates, quality compliance, and any history of contract disputes or terminations. A comprehensive review would involve searching federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) for previous awards and performance evaluations associated with GMA Cover Corp. to understand their experience and success in fulfilling similar requirements.

How does the spending on this specific contract fit into the broader historical spending patterns for textile products by the Department of the Army?

Analyzing how this $18.4 million contract fits into the Army's broader historical spending requires access to historical procurement data for textile products. The Department of the Army procures a vast array of goods, and textile products represent one category among many. To understand the context, one would need to aggregate spending on similar NAICS codes (like 314999) or product descriptions over several fiscal years. This would reveal whether this award is an outlier, a typical procurement amount, or part of a larger trend in demand for such textile items. Without this historical data, it's difficult to place this single contract within a larger financial picture.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Other Textile Product Mills › All Other Miscellaneous Textile Product Mills

Product/Service Code: WEAPONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2440 20TH ST, PORT HURON, MI, 09

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $18,455,400

Exercised Options: $18,455,400

Current Obligation: $18,455,400

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W15P7T06DC011

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline