Pentagon Renovation Management Contract Awarded for $14.9M to DMJM-3D/I Joint Venture

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,808,896 ($16.8M)

Contractor: Aecom/Parsons, a Joint Venture

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2003-11-26

End Date: 2004-12-31

Contract Duration: 401 days

Daily Burn Rate: $41.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200412!000046!9700!HQ0050!PENTAGON RENOVATION MANAGEMENT !MDA94701D0001 !A!N! !N!0004 ! !20031126!20041130!149022985!149022985!149022985!N!DMJM-3D/I A JOINT VENTURE !1525 WILSON BOULEVARD !ARLINGTON !VA!22209!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLINGTON !VIRGINIA !+000007538642!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT !000 !* !541611!E! !5!A!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!U!2!003!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22202

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $16.8 million to AECOM/PARSONS, A JOINT VENTURE for work described as: 200412!000046!9700!HQ0050!PENTAGON RENOVATION MANAGEMENT !MDA94701D0001 !A!N! !N!0004 ! !20031126!20041130!149022985!149022985!149022985!N!DMJM-3D/I A JOINT VENTURE !1525 WILSON BOULEVARD !ARLINGTON !VA!22209!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLI… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for program management and support services for the Pentagon Renovation. 2. The contract value is $14,902,298.55, with a duration of 401 days. 3. Competition was full and open, indicating a competitive bidding process. 4. The sector is primarily professional services, specifically administrative management and general management consulting.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $14.9M for program management services appears reasonable given the scale of the Pentagon Renovation project. Benchmarking against similar large-scale renovation management contracts would provide further context.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing as multiple vendors are encouraged to bid.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is beneficial for taxpayers, as it likely resulted in a more cost-effective outcome compared to non-competitive methods.

Public Impact

Supports the critical infrastructure of the Pentagon, a key government facility. Involves complex project management for a large-scale, high-profile renovation. Ensures continuity of operations and security during renovation phases. Creates jobs in the professional services sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns in large renovation projects.
  • Complexity of managing multiple stakeholders and construction phases.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through full and open competition.
  • Experienced joint venture likely to manage project effectively.
  • Supports critical national infrastructure.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. Spending in this sector often supports large government projects and infrastructure initiatives.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate specific subcontracting goals for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation in this contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is managed by Washington Headquarters Services, part of the Department of Defense. Oversight would involve monitoring project progress, budget adherence, and performance against contract requirements.

Related Government Programs

  • Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Washington Headquarters Services Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns.
  • Complexity of project management.
  • Dependency on contractor performance.
  • Impact of unforeseen site conditions.

Tags

administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $16.8 million to AECOM/PARSONS, A JOINT VENTURE. 200412!000046!9700!HQ0050!PENTAGON RENOVATION MANAGEMENT !MDA94701D0001 !A!N! !N!0004 ! !20031126!20041130!149022985!149022985!149022985!N!DMJM-3D/I A JOINT VENTURE !1525 WILSON BOULEVARD !ARLINGTON !VA!22209!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLINGTON !VIRGINIA !+000007538642!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT !000 !* !541611!E! !5!A!S! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AECOM/PARSONS, A JOINT VENTURE.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Washington Headquarters Services).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-11-26. End: 2004-12-31.

What specific management and consulting services are included in this contract?

The contract specifies 'PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES' and falls under the NAICS code 541611 for Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services. This likely encompasses a broad range of activities including planning, scheduling, cost control, risk management, coordination of various project elements, and potentially technical consulting related to the renovation.

What are the primary risks associated with managing a large-scale renovation project like the Pentagon's?

Key risks include unforeseen structural or environmental issues discovered during demolition and construction, potential delays due to supply chain disruptions or labor shortages, scope creep leading to budget overruns, and ensuring minimal disruption to ongoing Pentagon operations. Effective risk mitigation strategies and contingency planning are crucial.

How effectively does 'full and open competition' ensure value for money in complex infrastructure projects?

Full and open competition is designed to maximize the number of potential bidders, fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages innovation. For complex projects, it allows agencies to select the offer that best balances technical capability, past performance, and price, thereby increasing the likelihood of achieving good value for taxpayer money.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3101 WILSON BLVD, ARLINGTON, VA, 22201

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: MDA94701D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2003-11-26

Current End Date: 2004-12-31

Potential End Date: 2004-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2016-08-19

More Contracts from Aecom/Parsons, a Joint Venture

View all Aecom/Parsons, a Joint Venture federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending